References
- Adajian, Thomas. ‘On the Cluster Account of Art.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 43(2003): 379–85.
- Batteux, Charles. Les beaux-arts reduits à un nême principe. Paris: Durand, 1746.
- Brozzo, Chiara. ‘Are Some Perfumes Works of Art?’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78(2020): 21–32.
- Cooper, David. ‘In Praise of Gardens.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 43(2003): 101–13.
- Danto, Arthur. ‘The Artworld.’ Journal of Philosophy 61(1964): 571–84.
- Danto, Arthur. Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
- Davies, Stephen. Definitions of Art. London: Cornell University Press, 1991.
- Dutton, Denis. ‘A Naturalist Definition of Art.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64(2006): 367–77.
- Gaut, Berys.
‘“Art” a Cluster Concept.’ In Theories of Art Today, edited by Noël Carroll, 25–44. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000. - Gaut, Berys. ‘The Cluster Account of Art Defended.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 45(2005): 273–88.
- Kieran, Matthew. ‘Pornographic Art?’ Philosophy and Literature 25(2001): 31–45.
- Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Making Sense of Taste: Food and Philosophy. London: Cornell University Press, 1999.
- Levinson, Jerrold. ‘Erotic Art and Pornographic Pictures.’ Philosophy and Literature 29(2005): 228–40.
- Lopes, Dominic McIver. Beyond Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
- Machery, Edouard. Doing without Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
- Mag Uidhir, Christy. ‘Why Pornography Cannot Be Art.’ Philosophy and Literature 33(2009): 193–203.
- Mag Uidhir, Christy, and P. D. Magnus. ‘Art Concept Pluralism.’ Metaphilosophy 42(2011): 83–97.
- Mandelbaum, Maurice. ‘Family Resemblances and Generalisations Concerning the Arts.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 2(1965): 219–28.
- Meskin, Aaron, and Roy T. Cook, eds. The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9781444354843
- Miller, Mara. The Garden as Art. Albany: SUNY Press, 1993.
- Monseré, Annelies. ‘Why We Need a Theory of Art.’ Estetika 53(2016): 165–83.
- Nannicelli, Ted. ‘Why Can’t Screenplays Be Works of Art?’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69(2011): 405–14.
- Quinet, Marienne. ‘Food as Art: The Problem of Function.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 21(1981): 159–71.
- Rough, Brock. ‘The Incompatibility of Games and Artworks.’ Journal of the Philosophy of Games 1 (2017),
https://journals.uio.no/JPG/article/view/2736 . - Smuts, Aaron. ‘Are Video Games Art?’ Contemporary Aesthetics 3 (2005),
https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol3/iss1/6 . - Stern, Radu. Against Fashion: Clothing as Art, 1850–1930. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
- Tavinor, Grant. The Art of Videogames. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
- Telfer, Elizabeth. Food for Thought. London: Routledge, 1996.
- Weiskopf, Daniel. ‘Atomism, Pluralism and Conceptual Content.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(2009): 131–63.
- Weiskopf, Daniel. ‘The Plurality of Concepts.’ Synthese 169(2009): 145–73.
- Weitz, Morris. ‘The Role of Theory in Aesthetics.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15(1956): 27–35.
- Wollheim, Richard. Art and Its Objects, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
- Xhignesse, Michel-Antoine. ‘What Makes a Kind an Art-Kind?’ British Journal of Aesthetics 60(2020): 471–88.
- Zangwill, Nick. ‘The Creative Theory of Art.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 32(1995): 307–23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.213 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 113
Submitted on: Jan 24, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 26, 2021
Published on: Sep 16, 2021
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Christopher Bartel, Jack M. C. Kwong, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.