Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Feeling the Aesthetic: A Pluralist Sentimentalist Theory of Aesthetic Experience Cover

Feeling the Aesthetic: A Pluralist Sentimentalist Theory of Aesthetic Experience

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. Beardsley, Monroe. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1975.
  2. Broadie, Alexander. ‘Scottish Philosophy in the 18th Century.’ In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, winter 2017 ed. Stanford University, 1997–. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/scottish-18th/.
  3. Carroll, Noël. ‘Defending the Content Approach to Aesthetic Experience.’ Metaphilosophy 46 (2015): 17188. DOI: 10.1111/meta.12131
  4. Carroll, Noël. ‘Recent Approaches to Aesthetic Experience.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (2012): 16577. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01509.x
  5. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Poems of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1921.
  6. Cowie, Roddy. ‘Beauty Is Felt, Not Calculated; and It Does Not Fit in Boxes.’ In Schellekens and Goldie, Aesthetic Mind, 89105. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.003.0007
  7. Cutting, James. ‘The Mere Exposure Effect and Aesthetic Preference.’ In New Directions in Aesthetics, Creativity, and Arts, edited by Paul Locher, Colin Martindale, and Leonid Dorfman, 3346. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 2006. DOI: 10.4324/9781315224084-4
  8. Danto, Arthur C. The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art. Chicago: Carus, 2003.
  9. Dutton, Denis. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. London: Bloomsbury, 2009.
  10. Ellsworth, Phoebe. 2013. ‘Appraisal Theory: Old and New Questions.’ Emotion Review 5 (2013): 12531. DOI: 10.1177/1754073912463617
  11. Fingerhut, Joerg, and Jesse Prinz. ‘Wonder, Appreciation, and the Value of Art.’ Progress in Brain Research 237 (2018): 10728. DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.004
  12. Furnham, Adrian, and John Walker. ‘Personality and Judgements of Abstract, Pop Art, and Representational Paintings.’ European Journal of Personality 15 (2001): 5772. DOI: 10.1002/per.340
  13. Gracyk, Theodore. ‘Hume’s Aesthetics.’ In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, summer 2016 ed. Stanford University, 1997–. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/hume-aesthetics.
  14. Hjort, Mette, and Sue Laver, eds. Emotion and the Arts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
  15. Iseminger, Gary. ‘The Aesthetic State of Mind.’ In Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, edited by Matthew Kieran, 98110. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
  16. Iseminger, Gary. ‘Experiential Theories of Aesthetic Value.’ In Aesthetic Experience, edited by Richard Shusterman and Adele Tomlin, 4557. London: Routledge, 2008.
  17. Isen, Alice M., and Thomas E. Shalker. ‘The Effect of Feeling State on Evaluation of Positive, Neutral, and Negative Stimuli: When You “Accentuate the Positive”, Do You “Eliminate the Negative”?’ Social Psychology Quarterly 45 (1982): 5863. DOI: 10.2307/3033676
  18. Jacobsen, Thomas, Ricarda I. Schubotz, Lea Höfel, and D. Yves von Cramon. ‘Brain Correlates of Aesthetic Judgment of Beauty.’ Neuroimage 29 (2006): 27685. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010
  19. Kawabata, Hideaki, and Semir Zeki. 2004. ‘Neural Correlates of Beauty.’ Journal of Neurophysiology 91 (2004): 16991705. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003
  20. Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Savoring Disgust: The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756940.001.0001
  21. Levinson, Jerrold, ed. Suffering Art Gladly: The Paradox of Negative Emotions in Art. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. DOI: 10.1057/9781137313713
  22. Matravers, Derek. Art and Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  23. Mealey, Linda, and Peter Theis. ‘The Relationship between Mood and Preferences among Natural Landscapes: An Evolutionary Perspective.’ Ethology and Sociobiology 16 (1995): 24756. DOI: 10.1016/0162-3095(95)00035-J
  24. Mothersill, Mary. Beauty Restored. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
  25. Prinz, Jesse J. ‘Emotion and Aesthetic Value.’ In Schellekens and Goldie, Aesthetic Mind, 7188. Abbreviated as EAV. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.003.0006
  26. Prinz, Jesse J. The Emotional Construction of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  27. Prinz, Jesse J. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  28. Prinz, Jesse J. ‘How Wonder Works.’ Aeon Magazine. 21 June 2013. https://aeon.co/essays/why-wonder-is-the-most-human-of-all-emotions.
  29. Prinz, Jesse J. ‘Really Bad Taste.’ In Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, edited by Matthew Kieran and Dominic McIver Lopes, 95107. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5265-1_7
  30. Prinz, Jesse J. ‘Seeing with Feeling.’ In Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind, edited by Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran, Aaron Meskin, and Jon Robson, 14358. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  31. Richards, I. A. Principles of Literary Criticism. New York: Routledge, 1924. DOI: 10.4324/9780203278901
  32. Robinson, Jenefer. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005. DOI: 10.1093/0199263655.001.0001
  33. Rolls, Edmund T. ‘The Origins of Aesthetics: A Neurobiological Basis for Affective Feelings and Aesthetics.’ In Schellekens and Goldie, Aesthetic Mind, 11665. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691517.003.0009
  34. Rosenbloom, Tova. ‘Color Preferences of High and Low Sensation Seekers.’ Creativity Research Journal 18 (2006): 22935. DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1802_8
  35. Sackris, David. ‘Category Independent Aesthetic Experience: The Case of Wine.’ Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (2013): 11120. DOI: 10.1007/s10790-013-9374-0
  36. Sackris, David and Rasmus R. Larsen. 2020. ‘A Consideration of Carroll’s Content Theory.’ Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (2020): 24555. DOI: 10.1007/s10790-019-09693-6
  37. Schellekens, Elisabeth, and Peter Goldie, eds. The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  38. Shelley, James. ‘18th Century British Aesthetics.’ In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, fall 2018 ed. Stanford University, 1997–. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/aesthetics-18th-british/.
  39. Shiner, Larry. The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
  40. Sibley, Frank. ‘Aesthetic Concepts.’ Philosophical Review 68 (1959): 42150. DOI: 10.2307/2182490
  41. Walton, Kendall, L. ‘Categories of Art.’ Philosophical Review 79 (1970): 33467. DOI: 10.2307/2183933
  42. Zangwill, Nick. ‘Against Emotion: Hanslick Was Right about Music.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2004): 2943. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/44.1.29
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.212 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 116 - 134
Submitted on: Nov 10, 2018
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2020
Published on: Sep 15, 2020
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen, David Sackris, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.