Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Heretical Defence of the Unity of Form and Content Cover

A Heretical Defence of the Unity of Form and Content

Open Access
|Mar 2022

References

  1. Baudelaire, Charles. Les fleurs du mal et autres poemes. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1964.
  2. Bradley, Andrew Cecil. ‘Poetry for Poetry’s Sake.’ In Oxford Lectures on Poetry, 327. London: Macmillan, 1923.
  3. Glavaničová, Daniela, and Miloš Kosterec. ‘The Fine-Grainedness of Poetry: A New Argument against the Received View.’ Analysis 81 (2021): 22431. DOI: 10.1093/analys/anaa086
  4. Holmes, James S. ‘Forms of Verse Translation and the Translation of Verse Form.’ Babel 15 (1969): 195201. DOI: 10.1075/babel.15.4.01hol
  5. Hulatt, Owen. ‘The Problem of Modernism and Critical Refusal: Bradley and Lamarque on Form/Content Unity.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2016): 4759. DOI: 10.1111/jaac.12234
  6. Jacobs, Carol. ‘The Monstrosity of Translation.’ MLN 90 (1975): 75566. DOI: 10.2307/2907018
  7. Jolley, Kelly Dean. ‘(Kivy on) The Form-Content Identity Thesis.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2008): 193204. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayn005
  8. Kivy, Peter. ‘Paraphrasing Poetry (for Profit and Pleasure).’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 69 (2011): 36777. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01481.x
  9. Kivy, Peter. Philosophies of Arts: An Essay in Differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. DOI: 10.2307/432159
  10. Lamarque, Peter. ‘The Elusiveness of Poetic Meaning.’ Ratio 22 (2009): 398420. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00442.x
  11. Lamarque, Peter. ‘Philosophy and the Lyric.’ Journal of Literary Theory 11 (2017): 6373. DOI: 10.1515/jlt-2017-0007
  12. Lamarque, Peter. The Philosophy of Literature. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.
  13. Lamarque, Peter. ‘Poetry and Abstract Thought.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (2009): 3752. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00183.x
  14. Lamarque, Peter. ‘Semantic Finegrainedness and Poetic Value.’ In The Philosophy of Poetry, edited by John Gibson, 1836. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603671.003.0002
  15. Lamarque, Peter. Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  16. Leighton, Angela. ‘About About: On Poetry and Paraphrase.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (2009): 16776. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00189.x
  17. Lepore, Ernie. ‘The Heresy of Paraphrase: When the Medium Really Is the Message.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (2009): 17797. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00190.x
  18. McGregor, Rafe. ‘Poetic Thickness.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 54 (2014): 4964. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayt048
  19. McGregor, Rafe. The Value of Literature Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
  20. Ribeiro, Anna Christina. ‘Relevance Theory and Poetic Effects.’ Philosophy and Literature 37 (2013): 10217. DOI: 10.1353/phl.2013.0016
  21. Ribeiro, Anna Christina. ‘Toward a Philosophy of Poetry.’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (2009): 6177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.2009.00185.x
  22. Rosenthal, Alan S. ‘Baudelaire’s Mysterious “Enemy”.’ Nineteenth-Century French Studies 4(1976): 28694.
  23. Squire, Jack Collings. Poems and Baudelaire Flowers. London: The New Age Press, 1909.
  24. Tichý, Pavel. The Foundations of Frege’s Logic. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988.
  25. Yang, Jeffrey, ed. Birds, Beasts, and Seas: Nature Poems from New Directions. New York: New Directions, 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.207 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 47
Submitted on: May 15, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 3, 2021
Published on: Mar 15, 2022
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Daniela Glavaničová, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.