Abstract
According to the orthodox view, photographic artworks are abstract objects. This view, however, has recently been challenged by Christy Mag Uidhir. In his article ‘Photographic Art: An Ontology Fit to Print’, he argues in favour of a nominalist construal of photographic artworks. My goal is to show that Mag Uidhir’s argument is unpersuasive.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.141 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 13
Published on: May 15, 2016
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2016 Alexey Aliyev, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.