Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Biological Characteristics of the Mycelium and Optimization of the Culture Medium for Phallus dongsun Cover

Biological Characteristics of the Mycelium and Optimization of the Culture Medium for Phallus dongsun

Open Access
|Jun 2024

Figures & Tables

Table I

Range of factors investigated using Plackett-Burman design.

SymbolVariablesExperimental value
Low (-1)High (+1)
X1Glucose (g/l)1015
X2Wheat starch (g/l)57.5
X3Virtual 1-1+1
X4Carrot powder (g/l)57.5
X5Soybean powder (g/l)1015
X6Virtual 2-1+1
X7ZnSO4 (g/l)0.50.75
X8NH4Cl (g/l)0.50.75
X9Virtual 3-1+1
Table II

Factors and levels of response surface central composite design.

SymbolVariablesCode level
-1.6828–1011.6818
ASoybean powder (g/l)5.807.501012.5014.20
BZnSO4 (g/l)0.450.630.881.131.30
CNH4Cl (g/l)0.470.570.720.860.98
Fig. 1.

Effects of natural substances on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – control group, B – peeled potato, C – carrot powder, D – wood powder, E – wheat bran, F – potato powder, G – corn starch, H – wheat starch

Fig. 2.

Effects of composite natural substances on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – FA0, B – FA1, C – FA2, D – FA3, E – FA4, F – FA5, G – FA6, H – FA7

Table III

Effects of natural substances on the growth of Phallum dongsun.

Natural substanceColony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Control group29.64 ± 7.07de0.44 ± 0.13de#++
Peeled potato20.75 ± 0.79e0.28 ± 0.01e##+
Carrot powder42.17 ± 3.23bcd0.66 ± 0.06bcd###+++
Wood powder54.75 ± 5.1a0.88 ± 0.09a##+++
Wheat bran52.71 ± 7.22ab0.85 ± 0.13ab##++++
Potato starch37.63 ± 3.63bcd0.58 ± 0.06bcd#+
Corn starch37.58 ± 5.35bcd0.58 ± 0.10bcd#+
Wheat starch48.12 ± 9.48abc0.77 ± 0.17abc##++

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 #– sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Table IV

Effects of composite natural substances on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Test groupNatural substance (g/l)Colony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Peeled potatoWheat starchCarrot powderWood powder
FA020000026.78 ± 4.76c0.38 ± 0.09c###++
FA10200056.19 ± 6.44b0.91 ± 0.12b##+++
FA20020051.57 ± 7.10b0.83 ± 0.13b##+++
FA30002034.34 ± 4.57c0.52 ± 0.08c#++
FA401001067.07 ± 4.79a1.10 ± 0.09a#+++
FA501010052.35 ± 5.21b0.84 ± 0.09b###++++
FA600101056.19 ± 8.14b0.91 ± 0.15b#++++
FA7010101050.66 ± 9.46b0.81 ± 0.17b##+++

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Fig. 3.

Effects of suspension agents on the physical state of the medium and the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – control group, B – sodium carboxylmethyl cellulose, C – sodium alginate, D – dimethyl sulfoxide, E – Tween 80, F – gum arabic, G – xanthan gum

Fig. 4.

Effects of xanthan gum concentration on the physical state of the medium and the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – Control group, B – 0.5 g/l, C – 1.0 g/l, D – 1.5 g/l, E – 2.0 g/l, F – 2.5 g/l, G – 3.0 g/l

Table V

Effects of suspension agents on the physical state of the medium and the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Suspension agentMedium physical stateColony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Control groupSediment44.45 ± 6.Γ’0.70 ± 0.11**##+++
Sodium carboxylmethyl cellulose (g/l)Unstable suspension45.05 ± 8.48*0.72 ± 0.15*##++++
Sodium alginate (g/l)Unstable suspension44.10 ± 8.64*0.70 ± 0.15*###++++
Dimethyl sulfoxide (ml/l)Sediment33.11 ± 8.35c0.50 ± 0.15c##++++
Tween 80 (ml/l)Sediment38.95 ± 6.89bc0.61 ± 0.12bc#++++
Gum arabic (g/l)Unstable suspension50.73 ± 5.4a0.82 ± 0.1a##++++
Xanthan gum (g/l)Stable suspension, high viscosity48.03 ± 6.06*0.77 ± 0.11*###++++

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Table VI

Effects of xanthan gum concentration on the physical state of the medium and the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Xanthan gum (g/l)Medium physical stateColony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Control groupSediment60.41 ± 7.95a0.98 ± 0.14a##+++
0.5Stable suspension, Suitable viscosity65.34 ± 6.52a1.08 ± 0.12a##+++
1.0Stable suspension, Suitable viscosity66.04 ± 5.46a1.09 ± 0.10a##+++
1.5Stable suspension, Higher viscosity62.63 ± 7.24a1.03 ± 0.13a##+++
2.0Stable suspension, Higher viscosity61.06 ± 5.46a1.00 ± 0.10a##+++
2.5Stable suspension, high viscosity56.23 ± 6.40a0.91 ± 0.11a##+++
3.0Stable suspension, high viscosity60.68 ± 4.23a0.99 ± 0.08a#+++

1 Small letter in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Fig. 5.

Effects of carbon sources on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – control group, B – glucose, C – fructose, D – sucrose, E – maltose, F – lactose, G – brown sugar, H – cellulose, I – xylogen, J – chitosan

Table VII

Effects of carbon sources on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Carbon source (g/l)Colony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Control group36.84 ± 1.29bcd0.56 ± 0.02bcd##++
Glucose48.32 ± 3.63a0.77 ± 0.06a###+++
Fructose37.92 ± 6.61bcd0.58 ± 0.12bcd##++
Sucrose32.43 ± 3.27d0.49 ± 0.06d##+++
Maltose48.18 ± 2.97ab0.77 ± 0.05ab###+++
Lactose37.13 ± 6.36bcd0.57 ± 0.11bcd###++
Brown sugar36.57 ± 4.02cd0.56 ± 0.07cd##+++
Cellulose47.89 ± 5.17abc0.76 ± 0.09abc##+++
Xylogen0.00 ± 0.00f0.00 ± 0.00fn.d.n.d.
Chitosan18.07 ± 6.54e0.23 ± 0.12e##+

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth, n.d. – no data for the experimental group

Fig. 6.

Effects of nitrogen sources on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – control group, B – peptone, C – yeast powder, D – yeast extract, E – beef extract, F – soybean powder, G – KNO3, G – carbamide, I – NH4Cl, J – (NH4)2SO4, K – NaNO3

Table VIII

Effects of nitrogen sources on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Nitrogen source (g/l)Colony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Control group36.01 ± 5.30c0.55 ± 0.09c##+++
Peptone19.16 ± 4.26cd0.25 ± 0.08cd##+
Yeast powder9.16 ± 2.35cd0.07 ± 0.04cd##+
Yeast extract5.72 ± 0.63d0.01 ± 0.01d#+
Beef extract39.86 ± 5.18*0.62 ± 0.09*##++
Soybean powder44.18 ± 5.17*0.69 ± 0.09*###+++
KNO340.62 ± 4.33*0.63 ± 0.08*##+++
Carbamide5.70 ± 0.16d0.01 ± 0.00d#+
NH4Cl37.73 ± 5.98*0.58 ± 0.11*##++
(NH4)2SO435.66 ± 3.32b0.54 ± 0.06b##++
NaNO346.49 ± 5.31a0.74 ± 0.09a#+++

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Fig. 7.

Effects of inorganic salts on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – control group, B – KH2PO4, C – K2HPO4 · 3H2O, D – MgSO4 · 7H2O, E – MgCl2 · 6H2O, F – ZnSO4, G – CaCl2, H – CaSO4 · 2H2O, I – Fe2(SO4)3, J – CaCO3, K – NH4Cl, L – KNO3

Fig. 8.

Effects of composite inorganic salts on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – FM-A, B – FM-B, C – FM-C, D – FM-D, E – FM-E, F – FM-F, G – FM-G, H – FM-H

Table IX

Effects of inorganic salts on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Inorganic salt (g/l)Colony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
Control group40.00 ± 7.53abc0.62 ± 0.13abc##+++
KH2PO433.66 ± 8.64bcd0.51 ± 0.15bcd##+++
K2HPO4·3H2O36.14 ± 5.64bcd0.55 ± 0.10bcd###++
MgSO4·7H2O29.51 ± 4.16cd0.43 ± 0.07cd##++
MgCl2·6H2O39.37 ± 4.56abc0.61 ± 0.08abc##++
ZnSO450.14 ± 9.16a0.80 ± 0.16a###++++
CaCl237.11 ± 8.19abc0.57 ± 0.15abc###+++
CaSO4·2H2O37.09 ± 4.72abcd0.57 ± 0.08*cd#++
Fe2(SO4)341.85 ± 9.97abc0.65 ± 0.18abc###++++
CaCO320.79 ± 2.32d0.28 ± 0.04d#+
NH4Cl48.00 ± 7.14ab0.76 ± 0.13*###+++
KNO340.40 ± 6.27abc0.63 ± 0.11**###++

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Table X

Effects of composite inorganic salt on the growth of Phallus dongsun.

Test groupInorganic salt (g/l)Colony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
ZnSO4Fe2(SO4)3NH4Cl
FM-A00042.23 ± 8.15b0.66 ± 0.15b##++
FM-B10050.04 ± 4.62ab0.80 ± 0.08ab###+++
FM-C01039.01 ± 2.45b0.61 ± 0.04b##++
FM-D00139.07 ± 0.24ab0.61 ± 0.00ab##++
FM-E0.50.5049.51 ± 6.03ab0.79 ± 0.11ab###++
FM-F0.500.561.10 ± 7.26a1.00 ± 0.13a###++++
FM-G00.50.550.05 ± 8.99ab0.80 ± 0.16ab###++
FM-H0.50.50.544.52 ± 5.92b0.71 ± 0.11b###+++

1 Different small letters in the same column indicate significance at the 5% level

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth

Table XI

Plackett-Burman design and response values.

RunVariablesY Colony diameter (mm)
X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8
111-1111-1-149.92 ± 3.47
2-111-1111-159.97 ± 6.54
31-111-111174.45 ± 3.25
4-11-111-11160.35 ± 2.28
5-1-11-111-1159.05 ± 4.68
6-1-1-11-111-161.95 ± 5.93
71-1-1-11-11163.52 ± 4.59
811-1-1-11-1158.35 ± 4.82
9111-1-1-11-162.39 ± 4.49
10-1111-1-1-1153.93 ± 6.15
111-1111-1-1-150.62 ± 4.74
12-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-148.70 ± 2.69

1 X1X8 code values are shown in Table I

Table XII

Results of the regression analysis of the Plackett–Burman design.

SourceCoefficient estimatedfSum of squaresMeans quaresF–valuep –value (Prob > F)
Model58.606486.4281.075.140.0464*
X11.28119.5319.531.240.3162
X2-1.11114.9014.900.94530.3756
X4-0.064010.04910.04910.00310.9576
X5-1.36122.2422.241.410.2882
X75.171321.04321.0420.370.0063**
X83.011108.66108.666.900.0468*
Residual578.79
Cor Total11565.20

1 * – significant at 0.05 level, ** – significant at 0.01 level

Table XIII

Experimental design and results of the steepest ascent path.

Factor levelInorganic salt (g/l)Colony diameter (mm)Mycelium growth rate (mm/d)Colony densityHyphal growth
ZnSO4NH4Cl
Step size ()0.1250.073n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Origin (O)0.50.548.13 ± 3.000.77 ± 0.05###+++
O + 1 0.6250.57352.99 ± 5.850.85 ± 0.10###+++
O + 2 0.7500.64654.20 ± 7.010.87 ± 0.13###+++
O + 3 0.8750.71961.07 ± 2.201.00 ± 0.04###++++
O + 41.0000.79260.43 ± 10.180.99 ± 0.18###++++
O + 51.1250.86559.56 ± 4.150.88 ± 0.30###++++
O + 61.2500.93848.82 ± 4.68078 ± 0.08###++++
O + 71.3751.01151.52 ± 9.490.83 ± 0.17###+++
O + 8 1.5001.08432.24 ± 6.240.48 ± 0.11###++
O + 91.6251.15735.39 ± 12.320.54 ± 0.22###+++
O + 101.751.23029.47 ± 15.780.43 ± 0.28##+
O + 111.8751.30326.49 ± 8.020.38 ± 0.14##+
O + 122.001.37623.38 ± 7.400.32 ± 0.13##+

1 # – sparse colony density, ## – dense colony density, ### – densest colony density, + – weak mycelial growth, ++ – moderate mycelial growth, +++ – favorable mycelial growth, ++++ – strong mycelial growth, n.d. – no data for the experimental group

Table XIV

Response surface central composite design and matching results.

RunVariablesY Colony diameter (mm)
ABC
 1-1-1-164.56 ± 5.88
 21-1-154.69 ± 4.98
 3-11-162.58 ± 7.79
 411-154.35 ± 7.41
 5-1-1163.78 ± 5.37
 61-1159.50 ± 4.29
 7-11159.59 ± 9.21
 811154.91 ± 3.34
 9-1.68180063.33 ± 3.93
101.68180053.13 ± 4.86
110-1.6818062.65 ± 4.13
1201.6818059.95 ± 4.14
1300-1.681860.88 ± 1.57
14001.681858.10 ± 4.80
1500062.62 ± 2.36
1600061.43 ± 1.60
1700061.72 ± 7.81
1800064.65 ± 4.31
1900059.99 ± 2.18
2000061.76 ± 1.83

1 A, B and C code values are shown in Table II

Fig. 9.

Two-dimensional contour plots of response surface on mycelial growth of Phallus dongsun.

a – soybean powder vs. ZnSO4, b – soybean powder vs. NH4Cl, c – ZnSO4 vs. NH4Cl

Table XV

ANOVA for response surface quadratic polynomial model.

SourcedfSum of squaresMeans quaresF-valuep-value (Prob > F)
Modle215.88923.9913.540.0002**
A – Soybean powder143.141143.1480.81< 0.0001**
B – ZnSO417.91117.9110.110.0098**
C – NH4Cl0.692510.69250.39100.5458
AB0.192210.19220.10850.7487
AC10.44110.445.890.0356*
BC5.2215.222.940.1169
A228.37128.3716.020.0025**
B21.4611.460.82140.3861
C213.22113.227.460.0211*
Residual17.71101.77
Lack of Fit5.8151.160.48820.7750
Pure Error11.9052.38
Cor Total233.6019
R20.9242
Adjusted R20.8559

1 * – significant at 0.05 level, ** – significant at 0.01 level

Fig. 10.

Effects of different temperature on colony diameter and mycelial growth rate of Phallus dongsun.

Fig. 11.

Effects of different temperature on mycelial growth of Phallus dongsun.

A – 5°C, B – 10°C, C – 15°C, D – 20°C, E – 25°C, F – 30°C, G – 35°C

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2024-022 | Journal eISSN: 2544-4646 | Journal ISSN: 1733-1331
Language: English
Page range: 237 - 252
Submitted on: Feb 28, 2024
Accepted on: May 9, 2024
Published on: Jun 20, 2024
Published by: Polish Society of Microbiologists
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Chao Kang, Xuan Zheng, Wankun Wang, Weijun Zeng, Jing Wang, Zhongxuan Liu, Ling Yang, Fang Wang, Yan Zhu, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.