Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Increased Proteolytic Activity of Serratia marcescens Clinical Isolate HU1848 Is Associated with Higher eepR Expression Cover

Increased Proteolytic Activity of Serratia marcescens Clinical Isolate HU1848 Is Associated with Higher eepR Expression

Open Access
|Mar 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Zymography and proteolytic activity of Serratia marcescens strains.
A) SDS-PAGE of extracellular proteins precipitated by ammonium sulfate from bacterial cultures at 37°C (Coomassie stain). Identified proteins by mass spectrometry are indicated at the left; B) Zymography following SDS-PAGE using gelatin as substrate from supernatant cultures grown at 37°C. Arrowheads indicate gelatin degradation areas; C) Digestion of azocasein by normalized filtered supernatants.
Graphs represent the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Zymography and proteolytic activity of Serratia marcescens strains. A) SDS-PAGE of extracellular proteins precipitated by ammonium sulfate from bacterial cultures at 37°C (Coomassie stain). Identified proteins by mass spectrometry are indicated at the left; B) Zymography following SDS-PAGE using gelatin as substrate from supernatant cultures grown at 37°C. Arrowheads indicate gelatin degradation areas; C) Digestion of azocasein by normalized filtered supernatants. Graphs represent the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Fig. 2.

Transcriptional analysis of prtS and regulator genes in Serratia marcescens HU1848, SmUNAM836 and Db10.
qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression of A) prtS, B) slpD, C) eepR D) cpxR, and E) hexS. RNA was extracted from bacterial cultures at 37°C. The mRNA levels were normalized to the 16S rRNA gene. Relative expression was calculated by 2−ΔCT method
Means ± SEM from three independent experiments are shown (*p < 0.05).
Transcriptional analysis of prtS and regulator genes in Serratia marcescens HU1848, SmUNAM836 and Db10. qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression of A) prtS, B) slpD, C) eepR D) cpxR, and E) hexS. RNA was extracted from bacterial cultures at 37°C. The mRNA levels were normalized to the 16S rRNA gene. Relative expression was calculated by 2−ΔCT method Means ± SEM from three independent experiments are shown (*p < 0.05).

Fig. 3.

Differential eepR promoter expression and direct regulation of eepR by CpxR.
A) Scheme representation of the Serratia marcescens region encoding eepRS. DNA fragments employed in transcriptional fusion or in EMSA evaluations are depicted. White rectangles with asterisk indicate the two predicted CpxR binding sites. All nt positions are referred to eepR start codon; B) eepR promoter activity expressed as RLU during bacterial culture grown at 37°C. Filled and open triangles HU1848 carrying pPeepRHU1848 or pSEVA26, respectively. Filled and open circles SmUNAM836 carrying pPeepRSmUNAM or pSEVA26, respectively; C) EMSA using CRP (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 μM) and DNA region E1 amplified from SmUNAM836 or HU1848; D) EMSA using CpxR (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 μM) and the four DNA fragments (E1-E4) containing eepR upstream sequence of strain HU1848, reactions pre-incubated with acetyl phosphate are indicated (AcP).
E) qRT-PCR analysis of eepR expression from the S. marcescens strain HU1848 (WT), ΔcpxR strain and ΔcpxR carrying pPBADcpxR plasmid. Relative expression was calculated by 2–ΔCT method. Means ± SEM from three independent experiments are shown (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).
Differential eepR promoter expression and direct regulation of eepR by CpxR. A) Scheme representation of the Serratia marcescens region encoding eepRS. DNA fragments employed in transcriptional fusion or in EMSA evaluations are depicted. White rectangles with asterisk indicate the two predicted CpxR binding sites. All nt positions are referred to eepR start codon; B) eepR promoter activity expressed as RLU during bacterial culture grown at 37°C. Filled and open triangles HU1848 carrying pPeepRHU1848 or pSEVA26, respectively. Filled and open circles SmUNAM836 carrying pPeepRSmUNAM or pSEVA26, respectively; C) EMSA using CRP (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 μM) and DNA region E1 amplified from SmUNAM836 or HU1848; D) EMSA using CpxR (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 μM) and the four DNA fragments (E1-E4) containing eepR upstream sequence of strain HU1848, reactions pre-incubated with acetyl phosphate are indicated (AcP). E) qRT-PCR analysis of eepR expression from the S. marcescens strain HU1848 (WT), ΔcpxR strain and ΔcpxR carrying pPBADcpxR plasmid. Relative expression was calculated by 2–ΔCT method. Means ± SEM from three independent experiments are shown (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).

Oligonucleotides used in this study_

Primer5′–3′ primer sequencePurpose
XRQFwTGGAAGCCATGCATAAACTGInternal pair for cpxR
XRQRvTACGCTGCTGATGTTTCTGG
16SQFwGAGCAAGCGGACCTCATAAAGInternal pair for 16S
16SQRvTGCGGTTGGATTACCTCCT
ERQFwGGATTGGAAAACGTCAGCATGInternal pair for eepR
ERQRvGCCACGAAAAAGATGGCATC
HSQFwCTTCCAGCAGATCGACCATCInternal pair for hexS
HSQRvAGATCCTGCGCTTTAACGAC
SDQFwCGCGATCCAAAAATTGTACGInternal pair for slpD
SDQRvTCGTTCAGGTTGATCATCTG
PSQFwGACCTGGTACAACGTCAACInternal pair for prtS
PSQRvGTAGCTCATCAGGCTGAAC
PREcoFCCCTGAATTCCGTTTTTATTTGCGGCTGPair for eepR promoter cloning into pSEVA246
PRXbaRTGGGTCTAGATTGTTATCCATTTGTTCCTTCG
scSEVAFAGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGGAPair for pSEVA-based constructions screening
scSEVARCTTTCGGGAAAGATTTCAACCTGG
scETFwCCCTCAAGACCCGTTTAGAGPair for pET-based constructions screening
scETRvCTCTTCCGAGGTGAAAACCG
xRNdeFCGCGCATATGAACAAGATTCTGTTAGPair for cpxR amplification
xRBamRTTTGGATCCAAACTGTTGATCATGTTGC
CRPFwCCTGGTGCCGCGCGGCAGCCATGTTCTCGGCAAACCGCAAACPair for crp amplification
CRPRvCTGTCCACCAGTCATGCTAGCCATTAACGGGTGCCGTAGACG
HexSFwCCTGGTGCCGCGCGGCAGCCACATGACAACTGCAAATCGTCCPair for hexS amplification
HexSRvCTGTCCACCAGTCATGCTAGCCACGTTATTCTTCTTCGTCCAC
PeRFw1CAATAAAAAACCGGGACCCForward for eepR promoter (−358 nt from eepR start)
PeRFw2GCAGTCCRAGCGATGTGForward for eepR promoter (−271 nt from eepR start)
PeRRv2TTTCYGCTGAAAAAGCCACReverse primer for eepR promoter (+45 nt from eepR start)
PeRRv1TTGTTATCCATTTGTTCCTTCGReverse primer for eepR promoter (−11 nt from eepR start)
recAFwCAAGGCGAATGCCTGTAACTPair for EMSA negative control (internal for recA)
recARvGAGGATAGGCGCCACATAAA
UPxRFwGGGTTTTTTCGCTGATCACGTACGATGCGCTGCTGATGTTTCTGGPair for cpxR upstream region
UPxRRvGTTGCGCCAGCAGATACAGCAGCGAGGTCAACTCGCGGTC
DWxRFwGACCGCGAGTTGACCTCGCTGCTGTATCTGCTGGCGCAACPair for cpxR downstream region
DWxRRvGTACACCATGTGCACCGGTTCGAAGATGGTGACGATCAGCAGCAG
scTOXFCGCGACGGTTTCTTACAGTGPair for pTOX3-based construction screening
scTOXRGCTTCCCGGTATCAACAGAG
XRscFwCCAGAAATTTGTTGCTCCATCPair for cpxR deletion strain screening
XRscRvGGTCGGAACATCAGGTTGAT
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2024-002 | Journal eISSN: 2544-4646 | Journal ISSN: 1733-1331
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 20
Submitted on: Sep 22, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 14, 2023
Published on: Mar 4, 2024
Published by: Polish Society of Microbiologists
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Karla L. De Anda-Mora, Faviola Tavares-Carreón, Carlos Alvarez, Samantha Barahona, Miguel A. Becerril-García, Rogelio J. Treviño-Rangel, Rodolfo García-Contreras, Angel Andrade, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.