Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel for Detecting Bacterial Etiological Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in an Oncologic Hospital. Comparison with Conventional Culture Method Cover

Evaluation of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel for Detecting Bacterial Etiological Agents of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in an Oncologic Hospital. Comparison with Conventional Culture Method

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Table I

Comparison of bacteria identified by the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNP) and the conventional quantitative culture methods (CM) in 27 bacteriologically positive BAL samples.

BacteriumConventional quantitative culture methods (CM)BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNP)
Total number of bacteria detected*Total number of bacteria detected
Enterobacter cloacae complex**1 (0)2
Escherichia coli**7 (4)8
Haemophilus influenzae4 (3)4
Klebsiella oxytoca1 (1)1
Klebsiella pneumoniae group3 (2)3
Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis**0 (0)1
Proteus spp.3 (1)3
Pseudomonas aeruginosa**/***5 (3)5
Serratia marcescens**0 (0)1
Staphylococcus aureus**9 (4)10
Streptococcus agalactiae1 (1)1
Streptococcus pneumoniae**2 (2)3
Total number36 (21)42
Resistance genes
CTX-M1#1
IMP00
KPC00
NDM00
VIM00
OXA-48-like00
mecA/C and MREJ00
Total number11

1 Seventy-nine samples of BAL (bronchoalveolar lavage) were analyzed by CM and PNP. Twenty-seven samples were bacteriologically positive in the PNP test (reference method) at the detection level at > 104 genomic copies/ml.

1* bacteria identified in CM, regardless of the result of the diagnostic titer; in the brackets number of cultures equal to or above the diagnostic threshold (> 104–105 CFU/ml (CFU – colony-forming units))

1** microorganisms not detected in the culture method

1*** microorganism not detected in the PNP test

1# ESBLs positive (extended-spectrum p-lactamases)

Table II

Comparison of conventional quantitative culture method (CM) and the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia plus Panel (PNP). Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values.

MethodsSamplesTPFPFNTNSENSSPACCPPVNPVFPRFNRAUCSEP
PNP vs. combBAL2701510.9641.0000.9871.0000.98100.0360.9820.020.0000
CM vs. combBAL17011510.6071.0000.8611.0000.8230.0000.3930.8040.060.0000
CM vs. PNPBAL16111510.5930.9810.8480.9410.8230.0190.4070.7870.0620.0000

1 BAL – bronchoalveolar lavage, Comb = CM + PNP, TP – true positives, FP – false positives, FN – false negatives, TN – true negatives,

SENS – sensitivity, SP – specificity, ACC – accuracy, PPV – positive predictive value, NPV – negative predictive value, FPR – false positive ratio,

FNR – false negative ratio, AUC – area under the curve, SE – standard error of AUC, p – statistical significance level

The Spearman correlation coefficient R = 0.7466, p < 0.001

Table III

Performance of quantitative growth of fungi in conventional quantitative culture method (CM).

Name of fungiQuantity (CFU/ml)
102-103103-104104-105> 105
Aspergillus fumigatus4300
Candida glabrata5800
Candida albicans6510
Candida tropicalis2200
Candida dubliniensis3000
Kluyveromyces marxianus (formerly Candida kefyr)1000
Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly Candida krusei)0100
Saccharomyces cerevisiae1000
Penicillium spp.1000
Total number231910

1 Sixty-nine samples were analyzed for fungi by CM.

The results are presented as CFU/ml (CFU – colony-forming units).

The diagnostic threshold was ≥ 104 – 105 CFU/ml. Fungi growth was obtained in 28 out of 69 samples (40.6%), but only in one sample was the growth of Candida in the diagnostic titer.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2023-035 | Journal eISSN: 2544-4646 | Journal ISSN: 1733-1331
Language: English
Page range: 391 - 398
Submitted on: May 26, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 20, 2023
Published on: Dec 16, 2023
Published by: Polish Society of Microbiologists
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Maria Teresa Szymankiewicz, Anna Szczepanska, Elzbieta Stefaniuk, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.