Association between CMV (IgG) and socio-demographic data of pregnant women in the Al-Saudi Hospital in the Kassala State (n = 91)_
| Variables | Total (n = 91) | CMV IgG result | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (n = 89) | Negative (n = 2) | |||
| Age group | ||||
| 15–24 | 35 | 33 (94.3%) | 2 (5.7%) | 0.195 |
| 25–34 | 37 | 37 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| 35–44 | 19 | 19 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| History of miscarriage | ||||
| Yes | 29 | 29 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.328 |
| No | 62 | 60 (96.8%) | 2 (3.2%) | |
| Pregnancy trimester | ||||
| First trimester | 24 | 23 (95.8%) | 1 (4.2%) | 0.606 |
| Second trimester | 25 | 25 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Third trimester | 42 | 41 (97.6%) | 1 (2.4%) | |
| Occupation | ||||
| Housewife | 91 | 89 (97.8%) | 2 (2.2%) | – |
| Employee | 0 | |||
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 0 | – | ||
| Rural | 91 | 89 (97.8%) | 2 (2.2% | |
| Education level | ||||
| Illiterate | 91 | 89 (97.8%) | 2 (2.2%) | – |
| Primary | 0 | |||
| Secondary | 0 | |||
| Graduation | 0 | |||
Association between CMV (IgM) and socio-demographic data of pregnant women in the El Damer teaching hospital (n = 93)_
| Variables | Total | CMV (IgG) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative (%) | ||||
| Age group/years | 20–30 | 69 | 22 (31.9) | 47 (68.1) | 0.80 |
| 31–40 | 24 | 7 (29.2) | 17 (70.8) | ||
| History of miscarriage | Yes | 58 | 28 (48.3) | 30 (51.7) | 0.001 |
| No | 35 | 1 (2.9) | 34 (97.1) | ||
| Gestational stage | First | 37 | 8 (21.6) | 29 (78.4) | 0.028 |
| Second | 33 | 16 (48.5) | 17(51.5) | ||
| Third | 23 | 5 (21.7) | 18(78.3) | ||
| Occupation | Housewife | 93 | 29 (31.2) | 64 (68.8) | – |
| Employee | 0 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0) | ||
| Residence | Urban | 93 | 29 (31.2) | 64 (68.8) | – |
| Rural | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Educational level | Primary | 26 | 12 (46.2) | 14 (53.8) | 0.14 |
| Secondary | 44 | 10 (22.7) | 34 (77.3) | ||
| Graduated | 14 | 3 (21.4) | 11 (78.6) | ||
| Illiterate | 9 | 4 (44.4%) | 5 (55.6) | ||
Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women enrolled in this study (n = 184)_
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age group/years | 15–24 | 70 | 38% |
| 25–34 | 83 | 45.1% | |
| 35–44 | 31 | 16.9% | |
| History of miscarriage | Yes | 87 | 47.3% |
| No | 97 | 52.7% | |
| Gestational stage | First | 61 | 33.2% |
| Second | 58 | 31.5% | |
| Third | 65 | 35.3% | |
| Occupation | Housewife | 184 | 100% |
| Employee | 0 | 0% | |
| Residence | Urban | 93 | 50.5% |
| Rural | 91 | 49.5% | |
| Educational level | Illiterate | 100 | 54.4% |
| Primary | 26 | 14.1% | |
| Secondary | 44 | 23.9% | |
| Graduated | 14 | 7.6% | |
Association between CMV (IgG) and socio-demographic data of pregnant women in the El Damer teaching hospital (n = 93)_
| Variables | Total | CMV (IgG) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative (%) | ||||
| Age group/years | 20–30 | 69 | 62 (89.9) | 7 (10.1) | 0.18 |
| 31–40 | 24 | 19 (79.2) | 5 (20.8) | ||
| History of miscarriage | Yes | 58 | 56 (96.6) | 2 (3.4) | 0.001 |
| No | 35 | 25 (71.4) | 10 (28.6) | ||
| Gestational stage | First | 37 | 30 (81.1) | 7 (18.9) | 037 |
| Second | 33 | 30 (90.9) | 3 (9.1) | ||
| Third | 23 | 21 (91.3) | 2 (8.7) | ||
| Occupation | Housewife | 93 | 81 (87.1) | 12 (12.9) | – |
| Employee | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Residence | Urban | 93 | 81 (87.1) | 12 (12.9) | – |
| Rural | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Educational level | Primary | 26 | 24 (92.3) | 2 (7.7) | 0.38 |
| Secondary | 44 | 36 (81.8) | 8 (18.2) | ||
| Graduated | 14 | 12 (85.7) | 2 (14.3) | ||
| Illiterate | 9 | 9 (100) | 0 (0) | ||