Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Performance Evaluation of Different Commercial Serological Kits for Diagnosis of Acute Hepatitis E Viral Infection Cover

Performance Evaluation of Different Commercial Serological Kits for Diagnosis of Acute Hepatitis E Viral Infection

Open Access
|Jun 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram for patients with acute viral hepatitis E.
Flow diagram for patients with acute viral hepatitis E.

Consistency for HEV Ag and HEV RNA assays in the diagnosis of the acute HEV infections_

HEV RNA +, n (%)HEV RNA −, n (%)Total, n (%)
HEV Ag +, n (%)36 (41.86)0 (0)  36 (41.86)
HEV Ag −, n (%)8 (9.3)42 (48.84)  50 (58.14)
Total, n (%)44 (51.16)42 (48.84)86 (100)

Diagnostic performance of anti-HEV IgM assays_

Commercial tests% Sensitivity (95% CI)% Specificity (95% CI)% PPV (95% CI)% NPV (95% CI)AUC (95% CI) p % Specificity with RD (95% CI)% Specificity with CMV/EBV (95% CI)% Specificity with healthy (95% CI)
Wantai84.9 (75.5–91.7)100 (98.7–100)100 (100–100)95.5 (92.8–97.2)0.924 (0.892–0.949)< 0.01100 (100–100)100 (100–100)100 (100–100)
Kehua86.0 (76.9–92.6)100 (98.7–100)100 (100–100)95.9 (93.2–97.5)0.930 (0.899–0.954)< 0.01100 (100–100)100 (100–100)100 (100–100)
Lizhu83.7 (74.2–90.8)100 (98.7–100)100 (100–100)95.2 (92.5–97.0)0.919 (0.886–0.945)< 0.01100 (100–100)100 (100–100)100 (100–100)
Genelabs82.6 (72.9–89.9)99.3 (97.4–99.9)97.3 (89.9–99.3)94.8 (92.1–96.7)0.909 (0.875–0.937)< 0.0197.8 (94.8–100)100 (100–100)100 (100–100)

Concordance for anti-HEV IgM assays in the diagnosis of the acute HEV infections_

Commercial tests% ConcordanceKappa (95% CI)
Wantai
Kehua98.80.950 (0.852–1.000)
Lizhu98.80.953 (0.862–1.000)
Genelabs95.30.819 (0.648–0.990)
Kehua
Lizhu97.70.903 (0.771–1.000)
Genelabs96.50.860 (0.706–1.000)
Lizhu
Genelabs96.50.868 (0.722–1.000)

Diagnostic performance of anti-HEV IgG assays_

Commercial tests% Sensitivity (95% CI)% Specificity (95% CI)% PPV (95% CI)% NPV (95% CI)AUC (95% CI) p % Specificity with RD (95% CI)% Specificity with CMV/EBV (95% CI)% Specificity with healthy (95% CI)
Wantai91.9 (83.9–96.7)74.8 (69.3–79.8)53.0 (47.7–58.3)96.7 (93.6–98.4)0.833 (0.791–0.870)< 0.0179.2 (71.0–87.3)81.3 (73.3–89.3)64.6 (55.0–74.1)
Kehua87.2 (78.3–93.4)97.5 (94.9–99.0)91.5 (83.7–95.7)96.1 (93.4–97.7)0.923 (0.891–0.949)< 0.0198.9 (96.6–100)97.8 (94.8–100)96.9 (93.4–100)
Lizhu89.5 (81.1–95.1)75.9 (70.4–80.8)53.5 (48.0–58.9)95.9 (92.6–97.8)0.827 (0.784–0.865)< 0.0183.5 (75.9–91.1)74.7 (65.8–83.6)69.8 (60.6–79.0)
Genelabs88.4 (79.7–94.3)97.5 (94.9–99.0)91.6 (83.9–95.8)96.4 (93.8–98.0)0.929 (0.898–0.953)< 0.0198.9 (96.6–100)96.7 (93.0–100)97.9 (95.0–100)

Concordance for anti-HEV IgG assays_

Commercial testsConcordance of HEVConcordance of RDConcordance of CMV/EBVConcordance of healthy
%Kappa (95% CI)%Kappa (95% CI)%Kappa (95% CI)%Kappa (95% CI)
Wantai
Kehua95.30.753 (0.524–0.982)80.20.081 (–0.069–0.231)81.30.069 (–0.102–0.239)68.80.147 (0.015–0.279)
Lizhu98.80.927 (0.785–1.000)91.20.712 (0.525–0.898)88.50.809 (0.664–0.954)94.80.882 (0.782–0.982)
Genelabs96.50.805 (0.592–1.000)80.20.081 (–0.069–0.231)82.40.153 (–0.064–0.369)67.70.111 (–0.007–0.229)
Kehua
Lizhu96.50.823 (0.629–1.000)84.60.107 (–0.087–0.300)76.90.125 (–0.034–0.283)74.00.183 (0.238–0.341)
Genelabs96.50.837 (0.658–1.000)1001.000 (1.000–1.000)98.90.795 (0.403–1.000)99.00.852 (0.566–1.000)
Lizhu
Genelabs95.30.752 (0.520–0.984)84.60.107 (–0.087–0.300)78.00.183 (0.001–0.366)72.90.139 (–0.005–0.282)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2020-025 | Journal eISSN: 2544-4646 | Journal ISSN: 1733-1331
Language: English
Page range: 217 - 222
Submitted on: Mar 7, 2020
|
Accepted on: May 9, 2020
|
Published on: Jun 4, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 QIANG ZHANG, XIAOLONG ZONG, DONGMING LI, JING LIN, LIHUA LI, published by Polish Society of Microbiologists
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.