What Good Is Military Strategy? An Analysis of Strategy and Effectiveness in the First Arab-Israeli War

Jeffrey Meiser; Temmo Cramer; Ryan Turner-Brady

doi:10.31374/sjms.65

What Good Is Military Strategy? An Analysis of Strategy and Effectiveness in the First Arab-Israeli War

Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies

Volume 4 (2021): Issue 1

By: Jeffrey Meiser, Temmo Cramer and Ryan Turner-Brady

Open Access

|Jan 2021

Abstract

What good is military strategy? According to the scholarship on military effectiveness, the answer is “not much”—strategy does not significantly affect the performance of armies in combat. Strategic theory scholarship disagrees and describes four specific mechanisms linking strategy to military effectiveness: Exploiting weaknesses in the adversary’s strategy; causing psychological dislocation in the enemy commanders; creating a favorable center of gravity and pattern of war; and focusing resources and controlling violence in service of political goals. This essay uses a case study from the southern front of the First Arab-Israeli War to explore how strategy affects military performance. We find that Israeli General Yigal Allon’s military strategy significantly increased the combat efficiency and battlefield performance of the Israeli Defense Force, consistent with the mechanisms suggested by strategic theory. These findings suggest that military strategy is indeed an important determinant of military effectiveness.

References

Aloni, S. (2001). Arab-Israeli air wars 1947–82 (Osprey Combat Aircraft 23). Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arreguin-Toft, I. (2005). How the weak win wars: A theory of asymmetric conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511521645
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Betts, R. (2004). Is strategy an illusion? International Security, 25(2), 5–50. DOI: 10.1162/016228800560444
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Biddle, S. (2004). Military power: Explaining victory and defeat in modern battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400837823
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brathwaite, K. J. H. (2018). Effective in battle: conceptualizing soldiers’ combat effectiveness. Defence Studies, 18(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2018.1425090.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bregman, A. (2016). Israel’s wars: A history since 1947 (Kindle edition). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brooks, R. A. (2007). Introduction: The Impact of Culture, Society, Institutions, and International Forces on Military Effectiveness. In R. A. Brooks & E. A. Stanley (Eds.), Creating military power: The sources of military effectiveness (pp. 1–26). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804753999.003.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, I. T. (2018). A new conception of war: John Boyd, the U.S. marines, and maneuver warfare. Quantico, VA: Marine Corps University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bunton, M. (2013). The Palestinian-Israeli conflict: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780199603930.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Castillo, J. J. (2014). Endurance and war: The national sources of military cohesion. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804789103.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 67–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clausewitz, C. V. (1984). On war (M. Howard & P. Paret Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original Work Published 1832).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Echevarria, A. J. (2014). Reconsidering the American way of war: US military practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eshel, D. (2004). Chariots of the desert: Story of the Israeli armoured corps. London, UK: Brassey’s.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gerges, F. A. (2007). Egypt and the 1948 War: Internal conflict and regional ambition. In E. L. Rogan & A. Shlaim (Eds.), The war for Palestine: Rewriting the history of 1948 (pp. 150–75). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139167413.011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gray, C. (2015). The future of strategy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hoffman, F. G. (2014). Grand strategy: The fundamental considerations. Orbis, 58(4), 472–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.orbis.2014.08.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hart, B. H. L. (1991). Strategy. New York: Penguin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
King, A. (2016). On combat effectiveness in the infantry platoon: Beyond the primary group thesis. Security Studies, 25(4), 699–728. DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2016.1220205
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCoun, R. J., Kier, E., & Belkin, A. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 646–654. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X05279181.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mearsheimer, J. (1989). Assessing the Conventional Balance: The 3:1 Rule and its critics. International Security, 13(4), 54–89. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538780. DOI: 10.2307/2538780
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meiser, J. W. (2016–2017). Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy. Parameters: U.S. Army War College Quarterly, 46(4), 81–91. Retrieved from https://publications.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/3298.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Millett, A., Murray, W., & Watman, K. (1986). The effectiveness of military organizations. International Security, 11(1), 37–71. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538875
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morris, B. (2009). 1948: A history of the first Arab-Israeli war. London, UK: Yale University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1np9bm
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nolan, C. (2017). The allure of battle: A history of how wars have been won and lost. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nolan, C. (2019, June 24). Do generals matter? War on the Rocks. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2019/06/do-generals-matter/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pape, R. (1996). Bombing to win: Air power and coercion in war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pollack, K. M. (2004). Arabs at war: Military effectiveness, 1948–1991. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rumelt, R. (2011). Good strategy/bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. New York, NY: Crown Business. DOI: 10.1108/sd.2012.05628haa.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sullivan, P. (2012). Who wins?: Predicting strategic success and failure in armed conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199878338.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tal, D. (2004a). Between intuition and professionalism: Israeli military leadership during the 1948 Palestine War. The Journal of Military History, 68(3), 885–909. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3396731. DOI: 10.1353/jmh.2004.0147
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tal, D. (2004b). War in Palestine, 1948: Israeli and Arab strategy and diplomacy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203499542
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Talmadge, C. (2013). The puzzle of personalist performance: Iraqi battlefield effectiveness in the Iran-Iraq war. Security Studies, 22(2), 180–221. DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2013.786911
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Talmadge, C. (2015). The dictator’s army: Battlefield effectiveness in authoritarian regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/9781501701764
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tzu, S. (1997). The Art of War (S. Griffith, Trans.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original Work Published 5th century BC).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
United States Marine Corps (USMC). (1997). Warfighting (MCDP publication No. 1). Retrieved from https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publications/MCDP%201%20Warfighting.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wong, L. (2006). Combat motivation in today’s soldiers: U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 659–663. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X06287884
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wylie, J. C. (2014). Military strategy: A general theory of power control. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yuen, D. M. C. (2014). Deciphering Sun Tzu: How to read ‘The Art of War’. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Walt, S. M. (2005). The relationship between theory and policy in international relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 23–48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104904
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article