Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Co-Production of Intelligence: Engagement of Civil Society in Scandinavian Counterespionage Cover

Co-Production of Intelligence: Engagement of Civil Society in Scandinavian Counterespionage

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Akintayo, J. (2024). Whole-of-society approach or manufacturing intelligence? Making sense of state-CSO relation in preventing and countering violent extremism in Nigeria. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 17(3), 659683. 10.1080/17539153.2024.2360272
  2. Balzacq, T. (2014). Legitimacy and the “logic” of security. In T. Balzacq (Ed.), Contesting security (1st ed., pp. 19). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203079850-7
  3. Bauman, Z., Bigo, D., Esteves, P., Guild, E., Jabri, V., Lyon, D., & Walker, R. B. J. (2014). After Snowden: Rethinking the impact of surveillance. International Political Sociology, 8(2), 121144. 10.1111/ips.12048
  4. Ben Jaffel, H., Hoffmann, A., Kearns, O., & Larsson, S. (2020). Collective discussion: Toward critical approaches to intelligence as a social phenomenon. International Political Sociology, 14(3), 323344. 10.1093/ips/olaa015
  5. Beredskapsmuseet. (n.d.). A Swedish tiger. Retrieved March 24, 2026, from https://www.beredskapsmuseet.com/en/ensvensktiger
  6. Borch, O. J., & Heier, T. (Eds.). (2024). Preparing for hybrid threats to security: Collaborative preparedness and response. Routledge. 10.4324/9781032617916
  7. Born, H., & Johnson, L. K. (2005). Balancing operational efficiency and democratic legitimacy. In H. Born, L. K. Johnson, & I. Leigh (Eds.), Who’s watching the spies? Establishing intelligence service accountability (1st ed., pp. 225240). Potomac Books.
  8. Born, H., & Leigh, I. (2005). Making intelligence accountable: Legal standards and best practice for oversight of intelligence agencies. Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces. https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/making-intelligence.pdf
  9. Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946967. 10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
  10. Breitenbauch, H. Ø., & Tetzlaff, A. H. (2022). Samfundssikkerhed i Danmark: Det robuste og sikre samfund i en ny sikkerhedspolitisk virkelighed [Social security in Denmark: The robust and secure society in a new security policy reality]. Djøf.
  11. Bruce, J. B., & George, R. (2015). Professionalizing intelligence analysis. Journal of Strategic Security, 8(3), 123. 10.5038/1944-0472.8.3.1454
  12. Cecco, L. (2022, October 28). Suspected Russian spy arrested in Norway spent years studying in Canada. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/28/russian-spy-norway-canada-brazil-academic
  13. Crampton, J. W., Roberts, S. M., & Poorthuis, A. (2014). The new political economy of geographical intelligence. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(1), 196214. 10.1080/00045608.2013.843436
  14. de Werd, P. (2021). Reflexive intelligence and converging knowledge regimes. Intelligence and National Security, 36(4), 512526. 10.1080/02684527.2021.1893073
  15. DDIS. (2021). Indblik [Insight]. Danish Defence Intelligence Service. https://www.fe-ddis.dk/globalassets/fe/dokumenter/2021/indblik/-indblik-2021---tilgangelig-.pdf
  16. DDIS. (2024a). Udsyn: En efterretningsbaseret vurdering af de ydre vilkår for Danmarks sikkerhed og varetagelsen af danske interesser [Outlook: An intelligence-based assessment of the external conditions for Denmark’s security and the management of Danish interests]. Danish Defence Intelligence Service. https://www.fe-ddis.dk/globalassets/fe/dokumenter/2024/-fe-udsyn2024-.pdf
  17. DDIS. (2024b). Vil du hjælpe FE med at passe på Danmark? [Will you help the DDIS look after Denmark?]. Danish Defence Intelligence Service. https://www.fe-ddis.dk/da/karriere/vil-du-hjalpe-fe-med-at-passe-pa-danmark/
  18. Diderichsen, A. (2019). Spreading intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 34(3), 409420. 10.1080/02684527.2019.1553705
  19. DSIS. (n.d.). Tjenesten og truslerne [The service and the threats]. Danish Security and Intelligence Service. https://pet.dk/aktuelt/podcast
  20. DSIS. (2024a). Er jeres forskning i fare? [Is your research at risk?]. Danish Security and Intelligence Service. https://pet.dk/-/media/mediefiler/pet/dokumenter/vejledninger/forskning/er-jeres-forskning-i-fare-v2024.pdf
  21. DSIS. (2024b). Sikker forskning [Secure research] [Posters]. Danish Security and Intelligence Service. https://health.medarbejdere.au.dk/fileadmin/health-nyheder/2024/PET_Forskningssikkerhed_DK_A3.pdf
  22. Elkjær, S. F., & Pedersen, T. D. (2024, February 29). Universitet kæmmer ansøgerfelter for mulige spioner: Mellem fem og ti procent klarede ikke skærene [University combs applicant fields for possible spies: Between five and ten percent did not pass the screening]. DR. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/universitet-kaemmer-ansoegerfelter-mulige-spioner-mellem-fem-og-ti-procent-klarede
  23. Ericson, M., & Wester, M. (2022). If I tell you I will have to kill you: Secrecy in public administration in a time of securitization and militarization. Critical Studies on Security, 10(1), 4354. 10.1080/21624887.2022.2062926
  24. Eriksson, K. (2011). Co-production as a political form. World Political Science, 7(1). 10.2202/1935-6226.1107
  25. Euronews. (2023, January 20). Two brothers in Sweden jailed on charges of spying for Russia. https://www.euronews.com/2023/01/21/two-brothers-in-sweden-jailed-on-charges-of-spying-for-russia
  26. Gill, P., & Phythian, M. (2016). What is intelligence studies? The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs, 18(1), 519. 10.1080/23800992.2016.1150679
  27. Hartvigsen, M. S. (2024). Towards intelligence accountability as a virtue. Intelligence and National Security, 39(1), 119139. 10.1080/02684527.2023.2255446
  28. Hartvigsen, M. S., Hartmann, M. R. K., & Diderichsen, A. (2025). Intelligence oversight as an institutional battlefield: The Danish experience. In K. V. Rønn, A. Diderichsen, M. R. K. Hartmann, & M. S. Hartvigsen (Eds), Intelligence Practices in High-Trust Societies: Scandinavian Exceptionalism? (1st ed., pp. 89104). Routledge. 10.4324/9781032616377-9
  29. Hartvigsen, M. S., & Yauri-Miranda, J. R. (2026). Civil society organizations in intelligence accountability: democratic ideals and practical limitations. Democratization, 33(4), 799822. 10.1080/13510347.2025.2514012
  30. Heidelberg, R. L. (2017). Political accountability and spaces of contestation. Administration & Society, 49(10), 13791402. 10.1177/0095399715581033
  31. Herhkovitz, S. (2020). Crowdsourced intelligence (CROSINT): Using crowds for national security. The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs, 22(1), 4255. 10.1080/23800992.2020.1744824
  32. Hobel, L. G. (2024, September 30). Dansk efterretningstjeneste søger almindelige borgere til spionjob [Danish intelligence service seeks ordinary citizens for spy jobs]. DR. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/seneste/dansk-efterretningstjeneste-soeger-almindelige-borgere-til-spionjob
  33. Howell, J. (2014). The securitisation of NGOs post-9/11. Conflict, Security & Development, 14(2), 151179. 10.1080/14678802.2014.903692
  34. Ivan, C., Chiru, I., & Arcos, R. (2021). A whole of society intelligence approach: Critical reassessment of the tools and means used to counter information warfare in the digital age. Intelligence and National Security, 36(4), 495511. 10.1080/02684527.2021.1893072
  35. Kaleem, A. (2022). Citizen-led intelligence gathering under UK’s Prevent Duty. In H. Ben Jaffel & S. Larsson (Eds.), Problematising intelligence studies. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003205463-6
  36. Kniep, R., Ewert, L., Reyes, B. L., Tréguer, F., Cluskey, E. M., & Aradau, C. (2023). Towards democratic intelligence oversight: Limits, practices, struggles. Review of International Studies, 121. 10.1017/S0260210523000013
  37. Leigh, I. (2012). Rebalancing rights and national security: Reforming UK intelligence oversight a decade after 9/11. Intelligence and National Security, 27(5), 722738. 10.1080/02684527.2012.708525
  38. Leon-Reyes, B. (2022). Towards a reflexive study of intelligence accountability. In H. Ben Jaffel & S. Larsson (Eds.), Problematising intelligence studies: Towards a new research agenda (1st ed., pp. 3047). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003205463-3
  39. Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 118. 10.1080/07388940701860318
  40. Liebetrau, T., & Christensen, K. K. (2019). A new role for ‹the public’? Exploring cyber security controversies in the case of WannaCry. Intelligence and National Security, 34(3), 395408. 10.1080/02684527.2019.1553704
  41. Lopez-Lucia, E., & Martín De Almagro, M. (2024). Introduction: Transnational assemblages and the production of security knowledges. New perspectives on security governance in, and on, conflict and post-conflict contexts. Territory, Politics, Governance, 12(4), 465483. 10.1080/21622671.2023.2271524
  42. MacEwan, N. F. (2017). Responsibilisation, rules and rule-following concerning cyber security: Findings from small business case studies in the UK [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton].
  43. Manjikian, M. (2016). Two types of intelligence community accountability: Turf wars and identity narratives. Intelligence and National Security, 31(5), 686698. 10.1080/02684527.2015.1077627
  44. Maras, M. H. (2012). The social consequences of a mass surveillance measure: What happens when we become the ‘others’? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 40(2), 6581. 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.08.002
  45. McGee, R. (2020). Rethinking accountability: A power perspective. In R. McGee & J. Pettit (Eds.), Power, empowerment and social change (pp. 5067). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351272322-4
  46. Montelius, E., & Kvarnlöf, L. (2025). A challenged society: Constructions of vulnerable and resilient subjects in Swedish total defence policies. Critical Studies on Security, 124. 10.1080/21624887.2025.2509037
  47. MUST. (2024). Annual Report 2024. Swedish Military Intelligence and Security Service. https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/contentassets/aaf80ccf99ad476caef74fa179cbc010/must-annual-report-2024.pdf
  48. Nilsson, N., Weissmann, M., & Palmertz, B. (2025). Hybrid threats and the intelligence community: Priming for a volatile age. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 123. 10.1080/08850607.2024.2435265
  49. NIS. (2025). Fokus: Etterretningstjenestens vurdering av aktuelle sikkerhetsutfordringer [Focus: The Intelligence Service’s assessment of current security challenges]. Norwegian Intelligence Service. https://www.etterretningstjenesten.no/publikasjoner/fokus
  50. Njoku, E. T. (2021). Strategic exclusion: The state and the framing of a service delivery role for civil society organizations in the context of counterterrorism in Nigeria. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(5), 410430. 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1543131
  51. Ördén, H., & Russtad Markussen, H. (forthcoming). What does it mean to ‹securitize’ science? The diversity of securitization theory in the field of research security. In B. Walker-Munroe & T. Shih (Eds.), Routledge handbook on research security. Routledge.
  52. Paicu, S. C. (2023). Data-driven security and democratic intelligence: Key role of critical engagement by academia. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 36(3), 711728. 10.1080/08850607.2022.2032494
  53. Parsons, C. (2015). Beyond privacy: Articulating the broader harms of pervasive mass surveillance. Media and Communication, 3(3), 111. 10.17645/mac.v3i3.263
  54. Peissl, W. (2003). Surveillance and security: A dodgy relationship. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11(1), 1924. 10.1111/1468-5973.1101004
  55. Petersen, K. L. (2019). Three concepts of intelligence communication: Awareness, advice or co-production? Intelligence and National Security, 34(3), 317328. 10.1080/02684527.2019.1553371
  56. Petersen, K. L., & Rønn, K. V. (2019). Introducing the special issue: Bringing in the public. Intelligence on the frontier between state and civil society. Intelligence and National Security, 34(3), 311316. 10.1080/02684527.2019.1553365
  57. Petersen, K. L., & Tjalve, V. S. (2015). En offentlig hemmelighed: Når sikkerhedspolitik går fra statsmandskunst til allemandseje [A public secret: When security policy moves from statecraft to common property]. Politik, 18(3), 1323. 10.7146/politik.v18i3.27618
  58. Petersen, K. L., & Tjalve, V. S. (2018). Intelligence expertise in the age of information sharing: Public--private ’collection’ and its challenges to democratic control and accountability. Intelligence and National Security, 33(1), 2135. 10.1080/02684527.2017.1316956
  59. Petersen, L. B. (2026, March 24). PET-plakater advarer mod spionage på danske universiteter — men flere forskere kritiserer kampagnen [PET posters warn against espionage at Danish universities — but several researchers criticise the campaign]. Omnibus. https://omnibus.au.dk/arkiv/vis/artikel/pet-plakater-advarer-mod-spionage-paa-danske-universiteter-men-flere-forskere-kritiserer-kampagnen
  60. Politiet & PST. (2024). Øvelse Nordic Response 2024: Politiet og PST ønsker tips [Exercise Nordic Response 2024: The Police and PST want tips]. Politiets Sikkerhetstjeneste. https://www.politiet.no/globalassets/dokumenter-strategier-og-horinger/finnmark/2024-brosjyre-politiet-og-pst-i-finnmark-onsker-tips-norsk-elektronisk.pdf
  61. Reeves, J. (2012). If you see something, say something: Lateral surveillance and the uses of responsibility. Surveillance & Society, 10(3/4), 235248. 10.24908/ss.v10i3/4.4209
  62. Ritzau. (2024a, September 30). Efterretningstjeneste søger borgere til hemmelige opgaver [Intelligence service seeks citizens for secret assignments]. B.T. https://www.bt.dk/samfund/efterretningstjeneste-soeger-borgere-til-hemmelige-opgaver
  63. Ritzau. (2024b, September 30). Efterretningstjeneste vil lokke almindelige folk ind i spionjob [Intelligence service wants to lure ordinary people into spy jobs]. TV2 Nyheder. https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2024-09-30-efterretningstjeneste-vil-lokke-almindelige-folk-ind-i-spionjob
  64. Rønn, K. V., & Ördén, H. (2026). No more secrets? De-monopolizing intelligence. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 31(2), 233248. 10.1080/11926422.2025.2603703
  65. SÄPO. (2024). Swedish Security Service annual assessment 2024/2025. Swedish Security Service. https://sakerhetspolisen.se/om-sakerhetspolisen/publikationer/sakerhetspolisens-lagesbild/sakerhetspolisen-2024-2025/sammanfattning.html
  66. Shih, T., Cooney-O’Donoghue, D., Ördén, H., Hu, M.-C., Chubb, A., & Forsberg, E. (2023, October 6). The dangers of a zero-sum approach to global science. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230607092656114
  67. Shih, T., Ördén, H., Cooney-O’Donoghue, D., Chubb, A., & Forsberg, E. (forthcoming). Global science challenges in an era of geopolitical competition. Science, Technology and Society.
  68. Sims, J. E. (2022). Decision advantage: Intelligence in international politics from the Spanish Armada to cyberwar (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197508046.001.0001
  69. Skovgaard, C. (2024, February 15). “Havner dit arbejde i Teheran?” 182 KU-forskere kalder ny PET-kampagne racistisk [“Does your work end up in Tehran?” 182 University of Copenhagen researchers call new PET campaign racist]. Uniavisen. https://uniavisen.dk/havner-dit-arbejde-i-teheran-182-ku-forskere-kalder-ny-pet-kampagne-racistisk/
  70. Snetselaar, D. (2023). Dreams Lab: Assembling knowledge security in Sino-Dutch research collaborations. European Security, 32(2), 233251. 10.1080/09662839.2022.2127317
  71. SUPO. (2025). National security overview 2025. Finnish Security and Intelligence Service. https://supo.fi/en/counterintelligence-combats-unlawful-intelligence-operations
  72. Swed, O., & Materne, A. (2022). No accounting for bad contracting: Private military and security contracts and ineffective regulation in conflict areas. Studies in Comparative International Development, 57(1), 3662. 10.1007/s12116-021-09327-8
  73. Thomas, P. (2017). Changing experiences of responsibilisation and contestation within counter-terrorism policies: The British Prevent experience. Policy & Politics, 45(3), 305321. 10.1332/030557317X14943145195580
  74. Tuurnas, S., Stenvall, J., & Rannisto, P.-H. (2016). The impact of co-production on frontline accountability: The case of the conciliation service. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 131149. 10.1177/0020852314566010
  75. URIS. (2022). Retningslinjer for internationalt forsknings- og innovationssamarbejde [Guidelines for international research and innovation collaboration]. Udvalg om retningslinjer for internationalt forsknings- og innovationssamarbejde. https://ufm.dk/media/wyvhuhjh/uris-retningslinjer.pdf
  76. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (n.d.). If you see something, say something. Retrieved October 12, 2025, from https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something
  77. Van Buuren, J. (2014). From oversight to undersight: The internationalization of intelligence. Security and Human Rights, 24(3–4), 239252. 10.1163/18750230-02404003
  78. Van Puyvelde, D. (2013). Intelligence accountability and the role of public interest groups in the United States. Intelligence and National Security, 28(2), 139158. 10.1080/02684527.2012.735078
  79. Vogel, K., & Balmer, B. (2018). Secrecy and intelligence: Introduction. Secrecy and Society, 2(1). 10.31979/2377-6188.2018.020101
  80. Wigell, M., Mikkola, H., & Juntunen, T. (2021). Best practices in the whole-of-society approach in countering hybrid threats [Study]. European Parliament’s Special Committee on Foreign Interference in all Democratic Processes in the European Union, including Disinformation (INGE). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_STU(2021)653632
  81. Wollstad, A. (2022, November 11). Behåll din pusselbit [Hold on to your puzzle piece]. Svensk Tidskrift. https://www.svensktidskrift.se/amanda-wollstad-behall-din-pusselbit/
  82. Yauri-Miranda, J. R. (2021). Principles to assess accountability: A study of intelligence agencies in Spain and Brazil. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 34(3), 583613. 10.1080/08850607.2020.1809954
  83. Zajko, M. (2016). Telecom responsibilization: Internet governance, surveillance. Canadian Journal of Communication, 41, 7593. 10.22230/cjc.2016v41n1a2894
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.533 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 336 - 350
Submitted on: Dec 14, 2025
Accepted on: May 11, 2026
Published on: Jun 22, 2026
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Kira Vrist Rønn, Melanie Sofia Hartvigsen, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.