Allied with Constraints: U.S. Adaptive Integration of Nuclear-Constrained Allies
References
- Ackren, M. (2019). Traditional security in the Arctic: From bilateral to trilateral agreement: The case of Thule Air Base. In Arctic Yearbook 2019 (pp. 1–14).
https://arcticyearbook.com/arctic-yearbook/2019 - Agger, J. S., & Wolsgaard, L. (2006). All steps necessary: Danish nuclear policy, 1949–1960. Contemporary European History, 15(1), 67–84. 10.1017/S0960777306003109
- Alberque, W. (2017, February). The NPT and the origins of NATO’s nuclear sharing arrangements. Institut Français des Relations Internationales.
https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/migrated_files/documents/atoms/files/alberque_npt_origins_nato_nuclear_2017.pdf - Berdal, M. R. (1997a).
Anglo-American strategic policy and Norway, 1945–54 . In The United States, Norway and the Cold War, 1954–60 (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-1-349-13370-3_1 - Berdal, M. R. (1997b).
Intelligence and air strategies in the Arctic, 1954–60 . In The United States, Norway and the Cold War, 1954–60 (pp. 25–46). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-1-349-13370-3_2 - Berdal, M. R. (1997c). The United States, Norway and the Cold War, 1954–60. Macmillan. 10.1007/978-1-349-13370-3
- Bjoernsson, I. (2023). Negotiating Armageddon: Civil defence in NATO and Denmark 1949–59. Cold War History, 23(2), 217–238. 10.1080/14682745.2022.2123915
- Blankenship, B. (2024). Managing the dilemmas of alliance burden sharing. The Washington Quarterly, 47(1), 41–61. 10.1080/0163660X.2024.2323898
- Bothwell, R. (2007). Alliance and illusion: Canada and the world, 1945–1984. University of British Columbia Press. 10.59962/9780774854009
- Braut-Hegghammer, M., & Bowers, I. (2026). Small States and the Third Nuclear Age: An Introduction. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Braut-Hegghammer, M., & Hagstrom, L. E. (2026). Hawks in the High North: The Rise of a Nordic Deterrence Cluster. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1).
- Breitenbauch, H. (2024). Nuclear MEED: Recipe for a minimum European extended deterrent. 10.2139/ssrn.4987135
- Buzan, B. (1983).
National security and the nature of the state . In People, states, and fear: The national security problem in international relations (pp. 36–65). Wheatsheaf Books. - Buzan, B. (1991). New patterns of global security in the twenty-first century. International Affairs, 67(3), 431–451. 10.2307/2621945
- Bykova, A., Hilde, P. S., Depledge, D., Østhagen, A., & Lackenbauer, P. (2025).
NATO in the Arctic: Misunderstood and misrepresented . In A. Raspotnik & A. Østhagen (Eds.), The Nordic states, NATO and the EU in Arctic security: A new Nordic balance? Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781035333486 - Byun, J., & Lee, D. Y. (2021). The case against nuclear sharing in East Asia. The Washington Quarterly, 44(4), 67–87. 10.1080/0163660X.2021.2018793
- Cameron, J. (2024). Deterrence, reassurance and strategic stability: The enduring relevance of Johan Jørgen Holst. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(3), 363–386. 10.1080/01402390.2024.2321135
- Cameron, J. (2025, March 31). Eurodeterrent: A vision for an Anglo-French nuclear force. War on the Rocks.
https://warontherocks.com/eurodeterrent-a-vision-for-an-anglo-french-nuclear-force/ - Cameron, J., & Bruusgaard, K. V. (2024). Norway, deterrence, reassurance and strategic stability in Europe. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(3), 325–333. 10.1080/01402390.2024.2321138
- Chevreuil, A. (2025). European deterrence at a crossroads: French and British nuclear options. The Washington Quarterly, 48(2), 115–132. 10.1080/0163660X.2025.2514975
- Doeser, F. (2011). Domestic politics and foreign policy change in small states: The fall of the Danish ‘footnote policy’. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(2), 222–241. 10.1177/0010836711406417
- Dörfer, I. (1986). Scandinavia and NATO: À la carte. The Washington Quarterly, 9(1), 15–30. 10.1080/01636608609450813
- Efremova, K. (2019). Small states in great power politics: Understanding the “buffer effect.” Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 13(1), 100–121. 10.51870/CEJISS.A130102
- Egeland, K. (2025). The ‘cosmic bluff’ revisited: Extended nuclear deterrence in the US–Norway alliance. Cold War History, 25(1), 43–66. 10.1080/14682745.2024.2352531
- Fayet, H., Futter, A., & Kühn, U. (2024). Forum: Towards a European nuclear deterrent. Survival Online.
https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/survival-online/2024/09/forum-towards-a-european-nuclear-deterrent/ - Fearon, J. D. (1997). Signaling foreign policy interests: Tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 68–90. 10.1177/0022002797041001004
- Forssell, B., & Kjerstad, N. (2025). Loran-C (navigasjonssystem) [Loran-C (navigation system)]. Store norske leksikon.
https://snl.no/Loran-C_-_navigasjonssystem - Freedman, L. (2025). Europe’s nuclear deterrent: The here and now. Survival Online.
https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/survival-online/2025/06/europes-nuclear-deterrent-the-here-and-now/ - Fuhrmann, M. (2018). On extended nuclear deterrence. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 29(1), 51–73. 10.1080/09592296.2017.1420526
- Fuhrmann, M., & Sechser, T. S. (2014a). Nuclear strategy, nonproliferation, and the causes of foreign nuclear deployments. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(3), 455–480. 10.1177/0022002713509055
- Fuhrmann, M., & Sechser, T. S. (2014b). Signaling alliance commitments: Hand-tying and sunk costs in extended nuclear deterrence. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 919–935. 10.1111/ajps.12082
- Gartzke, E., Lindsay, J. R., & Kagotani, K. (2024).
Land: Presence and credibility . In Elements of deterrence (1st ed., pp. 195–223). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197754443.003.0008 - Gerring, J. (2012). Mere description. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 721–746. 10.1017/S0007123412000130
- Gjeseth, G. (2014). Den amerikanske våpenhjelpen [The American arms aid]. Institutt for Forsvarsstudier.
- González-Ocantos, E. (2020).
Designing qualitative research projects: Notes on theory building, case selection and field research . In L. Curini & R. Franzese (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research methods in political science and international relations (pp. 104–120). SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781526486387.n9 - Handel, M. I. (1990a).
Internal sources of weakness and strength of weak states . In Weak states in the international system (new impression with additional material (pp. 1–79). Taylor & Francis. - Handel, M. I. (1990b). Weak states in the international system (new impression with additional material). Taylor & Francis.
- Haugevik, K., & Sending, O. J. (2020). The Nordic balance revisited: Differentiation and the foreign policy repertoires of the Nordic states. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 110–119. 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3380
- Holbraad, C. (1991). Danish neutrality: A study in the foreign policy of a small state. Clarendon. 10.1093/oso/9780198273561.001.0001
- Holm, H.-H. (1989). A democratic revolt? Stability and change in Danish security policy 1979–1989. Cooperation and Conflict, 24(3), 179–197.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/45084227 - Holst, J. J. (1966). Norwegian security policy: The strategic context. Cooperation and Conflict, 1(4), 64–79. 10.1177/001083676600100404
- Holst, J. J. (1984). The pattern of Nordic security. Daedalus, 113(2), 195–225.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20024918 - Honkanen, K. (2002). The influence of small states on NATO decision-making: The membership experiences of Denmark, Norway, Hungary and the Czech Republic (FOI-R-0548-SE). Swedish Defence Research Agency.
- King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400821211
- Kjellén, J. (2022). The Russian Northern Fleet and the (re)militarisation of the Arctic. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 13, 34–52. 10.23865/arctic.v13.3338
- Kristensen, H. M., Korda, M., Johns, E., & Knight, M. (2023). Nuclear weapons sharing, 2023. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 79(6), 393–406. 10.1080/00963402.2023.2266944
- Lee, D. Y. (2023). Upgrading the bomb: Why and how the US provides advanced nuclear assistance to junior allies. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(2), 181–207. 10.1093/cjip/poad005
- Lundestad, G. (1986). Empire by invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952. Journal of Peace Research, 23(3), 263–277.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/423824 - Magallona, M. (1991).
U.S. military bases and Philippine sovereignty . In Military bases and nuclear weapons: U.S. neocolonialism in the Philippines (pp. 1–79). University of the Philippines Law Complex. - Maloney, S. M. (2007). Learning to love the bomb: Canada’s nuclear weapons during the Cold War. Potomac Books.
- Morrow, J. D. (1991). Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 904–933. 10.2307/2111499
- Morrow, J. D. (1993). Arms versus allies: Trade-offs in the search for security. International Organization, 47(2), 207–233.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706889 - Morrow, J. D. (1994). Alliances, credibility, and peacetime costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(2), 270–297. 10.1177/0022002794038002005
- Morrow, J. D. (1999).
The strategic setting of choices: Signaling, commitment, and negotiation in international politics . In D. A. Lake & R. Powell (Eds.), Strategic choice and international relations (pp. 77–114). Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvzxx9hk - Narang, V., & Vaddi, P. (2025). How to survive the new nuclear age: National security in a world of proliferating risks and eroding constraints. Foreign Affairs, 104(3), 122–139.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/how-survive-new-nuclear-age-narang-vaddi - National Security Archive. (2016). U.S. nuclear weapons policy toward Iceland, 1951–1960 (W. Burr, Ed., Briefing Book No. 557). The George Washington University.
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2016-08-15/us-government-debated-secret-nuclear-deployments-iceland - National Security Archive. (2025a, June 3). The United States and Greenland, Part I: Episodes in a nuclear history (W. Burr, Ed., Briefing Book No. 895). The George Washington University.
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2025-06-03/united-states-and-greenland-part-i-episodes-nuclear-history - National Security Archive. (2025b, October 15). The United States and Greenland, Part II: The B-52 crash and its impact, 1957–1968 (W. Burr, Ed., Briefing Book No. 906). The George Washington University.
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2025-10-15/united-states-and-greenland-episodes-nuclear-history-1957 - NATO. (1954, November 22). Military Committee (MC) 48 (Final): A report by the Military Committee on the most effective pattern of NATO military strength for the next few years. NATO Digital Archives.
https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a541122a.pdf - NATO. (1961). SHAPE 188/61: Letter by General Lauris Norstad, USAF. NATO Digital Archives.
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_archives/20110512_19610915-DP-SHAPE_188_61-Analys-1.pdf - NATO. (1969, December 8). Military Committee (MC) 48/3 (Final): Measures to implement the strategic concept for the defence of the NATO area. NATO Digital Archives.
https://www.nato.int/docu/stratdoc/eng/a691208a.pdf - NATO. (2025a, May 22). Joint press conference with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and the Prime Minister of Norway, Jonas Gahr Støre. North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/events/transcripts/2025/05/22/joint-press-conference - NATO. (2025b). Norway and NATO.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_162353.html - Oma, I. M., & Petersson, M. (2019). Exploring the role of dependence in influencing small states’ alliance contributions: A reputation mechanism argument and assessment. European Security, 28(1), 105–126. 10.1080/09662839.2019.1589455
- Palmer, D. A. R. (2024).
NATO’s military transformations, 1949–2024 . In J. A. Olsen (Ed.), Routledge handbook of NATO (1st ed., pp. 79–92). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003364108-9 - Petersen, N. (1972). Danish security policy in the seventies: Continuity or change? Cooperation and Conflict, 7(3), 139–170.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/45083089 - Petersen, N. (2011). SAC at Thule: Greenland in the U.S. polar strategy. Journal of Cold War Studies, 13(2), 90–115.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26923533 - Petersen, N. (2012). ‘Footnoting’ as a political instrument: Denmark’s NATO policy in the 1980s. Cold War History, 12(2), 295–317. 10.1080/14682745.2011.558176
- Petersson, M., & Lunde Saxi, H. (2013). Shifted roles: Explaining Danish and Norwegian alliance strategy 1949–2009. Journal of Strategic Studies, 36(6), 761–788. 10.1080/01402390.2011.608934
- Riste, O. (1999).
Comint: Communications intelligence . In The Norwegian intelligence service, 1945–1970 (1st ed., pp. 84–114). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315037103 - Riste, O. (2001). Norway’s foreign relations: A history. Universitetsforlaget.
- Ruffa, C. (2020).
Case study methods: Case selection and case analysis . In L. Curini & R. Franzese (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research methods in political science and international relations (pp. 1133–1147). SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781526486387.n62 - Saxi, H. (2010).
Norwegian and Danish defence policy: A comparative study of the post-Cold War era (A. T. Klingstedt, Ed.). Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies. - Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt5vm52s
- Skogrand, K., & Tamnes, R. (2001).
Atomvåpen til norske styrker: Forberedelser i fredstid, planer for krig [Nuclear weapons for Norwegian forces: Preparations in peacetime, plans for war] . In Fryktens likevekt: Atombomben, Norge og verden 1945–1970 (pp. 229–335). Tiden Norsk Forlag.https://www.nb.no/items/417b35222e4d38bb34419118a2af70fd?page=1 - Snyder, G. H. (1984). The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics, 36(4), 461–495. 10.2307/2010183
- Sukin, L. (2020). Credible nuclear security commitments can backfire: Explaining domestic support for nuclear weapons acquisition in South Korea. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(6), 1011–1042. 10.1177/0022002719888689
- Suporn, T. (2025). The forgotten bombs: America’s secret nuclear deployment in the Philippines during the Cold War. Political Science Journal, 4(1), 24–45.
https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/polsciPSU/article/view/280626 - Tamnes, R. (1983).
The Norwegian response to the question of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Nordic area 1958–1983 . In Årbok for Forsvarshistorisk forskningssenter Forsvarets høgskole 1982 (pp. 84–86). Forlaget Tanum-Norli. - Tamnes, R. (1987).
Integration and screening: The two faces of Norwegian alliance policy, 1945–1986 . In Forsvars Studier Defence Studies (Vol. 6). Forfatterne og TANO.https://fhs.brage.unit.no/fhs-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/99785/IFS_arbok_1987.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y - Tamnes, R. (1991). The United States and the Cold War in the High North. Dartmouth.
- Tamnes, R. (2024).
NATO and the Northern Flank, 1949–2024 . In J. A. Olsen (Ed.), Routledge handbook of NATO. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003364108-27 - Trachtenberg, M. (1999).
Eisenhower and nuclear sharing; an alliance in disarray; Kennedy, NATO and Berlin . In A constructed peace: The making of the European settlement, 1945–1963 (pp. 146–200). Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400843459-007 - U.S. Department of State. (1957a, May 28).
Dispatch from the Embassy in Denmark to the Department of State, Copenhagen, May 28, 1957 (Document 180, Central Files, 611.59/5–2857) . FRUS 1955–1957, Vol. XXVII: Western Europe and Canada.https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v27/d180 - U.S. Department of State. (1957b, November 25).
Telegram from the Embassy in Denmark to the Department of State, Copenhagen, November 25, 1957 (Document 183, Central Files, 759.5611/11–2557) . FRUS 1955–1957, Vol. XXVII: Western Europe and Canada.https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v27/d183 - U.S. Department of State. (1961a, January 24). Memorandum for the President: Visit by Prime Minister of Denmark to the United States. U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD.
- U.S. Department of State. (1961b, August 4).
Telegram from Copenhagen to Secretary of State (No. 74, Control No. 3480) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1961c, October 20).
Telegram from Copenhagen to Secretary of State (No. 255, Control No. 12709) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1961d, November 16).
Telegram from Copenhagen to Secretary of State: Information sent to Stockholm, Oslo, Helsinki, Bonn, and Paris (No. 322, Control No. 10455) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1961e, November 22).
Outgoing telegram to Embassy Copenhagen: Paris for USRO, Stoessel, and McGuire (No. 298, Ref. Deptel 281, Control No. 5952) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1961f, December 4).
State-Defense message to U.S. embassies in Paris, Bonn, Copenhagen, and USCINCEUR . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1963a, March 22).
Memorandum of conversation: Economic matters; OECD, The White House, 4:40 p.m. (No. 4352, Part 2 of 4) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1963b, March 22).
Memorandum of conversation: MLF – Norway (No. 4419, Part 2 of 5) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1963c, March 28).
Harlem public statement on Washington visit: Telegram from Oslo to Secretary of State, 6:00 PM (No. 413, Control No. 21350) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (1969).
Presidential decision on categories of information for Symington Subcommittee to be protected by executive privilege [Declassified Top Secret memorandum] (RG 59, Subject-Numeric Files 1967–1969, DEF 12, Box 398) . U.S. National Archives, College Park, MD. - U.S. Department of State. (2025).
The Berlin crises, 1958–1962. Milestones: 1953–1960 . Office of the Historian.https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/berlin-crises - U.S. National Security Council. (1960). Statement of U.S. policy toward Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway and Sweden) (NSC 6006/1). FRUS 1958–1960, Vol. VII, Pt. 2, Doc. 300.
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v07p2/d300 - U.S. Office of International Security Affairs. (1962, February 1).
Preliminary report on MRBMs, nuclear sharing, and related issues (No. 1-25,153/62, National Security Files) . John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston, MA. - USMC. (2025).
108938: NATO Operation Bold Guard/Northern Wedding (01216-70-78; R-10-61; 12-1776) . United States Marine Corps Film Repository.https://digital.tcl.sc.edu/digital/collection/MarineCorps/id/5715/ - Villaume, P. (1995).
Allieret med forbehold: Danmark, NATO og Den kolde Krig – en studie i dansk sikkerhedspolitik 1949–1961 [Allied with reservations: Denmark, NATO and the Cold War – a study in Danish security policy 1949–1961] . Eirene. - Villaume, P. (2008).
Confronting the ‘small state syndrome’: Danish post-Cold War foreign policy and the use of Cold War history . In J. Aunesluoma & P. Kettunen (Eds.), The Cold War and the politics of history (pp. 37–60). Edita Publishing/University of Helsinki.https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/784f7953-025f-49f1-b1fa-152533bfccd4/content - Vital, D. (1967). The inequality of states: A study of small power in international relations. Clarendon Press.
- Von Hlatky, S., & Lambert-Deslandes, É. (2024). The Ukraine war and nuclear sharing in NATO. International Affairs, 100(2), 509–530. 10.1093/ia/iiae007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.494 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 433 - 452
Submitted on: Oct 20, 2025
Accepted on: May 28, 2026
Published on: Jul 15, 2026
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Hasini Ransala Liyanage, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.