Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“Information Is Motivation”: A Critical Perspective on Awareness and Compliance in Military Cybersecurity Cover

“Information Is Motivation”: A Critical Perspective on Awareness and Compliance in Military Cybersecurity

By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. AL-Hawamleh, A. M. (2023). Predictions of cybersecurity experts on future cyber-attacks and related cybersecurity measures. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(2), 315. 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140292
  2. Allhoff, F., Henschke, A., & Strawser, B. J. (2016). Binary bullets: the ethics of cyberwarfare. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190221072.001.0001
  3. Almansoori, A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2023). Exploring the frontiers of cybersecurity behavior: a systematic review of studies and theories. Applied Sciences, 13(9), Article 9. 10.3390/app13095700
  4. Backman, S., & Stevens, T. (2024). Cyber risk logics and their implications for cybersecurity. International Affairs, 100(6), 24412460. 10.1093/ia/iiae236
  5. Bay, S., Biteniece, N., Bertolin, G., Christie, E. H., Dek, A., Fredheim, R. E., Gallacher, J. D., Kononova, K., & Marchenko, T. (2019). The current digital arena and its risks to serving military personnel (pp. 718). NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/download/nato_report_-_hacking_humans_the_current_digital_arena_and_its_risks_to_serving_military_personnel.pdf
  6. Bergh, A. (2020). Understanding influence operations in social media. Journal Of Information Warfare, 19(4), Article 4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27033648
  7. Berrefjord, V. R., & Bjørstad, T. E. (2024). Commercially sourced intelligence: Friend or foe? Intelligence and National Security, 0(0), 121. 10.1080/02684527.2024.2437955
  8. Bhatnagar, N., & Pry, M. (2020). Student attitudes, awareness, and perceptions of personal privacy and cybersecurity in the use of social media: An initial study. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(1), 4858. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1246231.pdf
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589597. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  10. Briggs, C. L. (2007). Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary society. Current Anthropology, 48(4), 551580. 10.1086/518300
  11. Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: how computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11022.001.0001
  12. Bundtzen, S. (2022). Suggested for you: Understanding how algorithmic ranking practices affect online discourses and assessing proposed alternatives. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Understanding-How-Algorithmic-Ranking-Practices-Affect-Online-Discourses-and-Assessing-Proposed-Alternatives.pdf
  13. Chandarman, R., & Van Niekerk, B. (2017). Students’ cybersecurity awareness at a private tertiary educational institution. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 20, 133155. 10.23962/10539/23572
  14. Chirgwin, R. (2018, January 29). All your base are belong to us: Strava exercise app maps military sites, reveals where spies jog. The Register. https://www.theregister.com/2018/01/29/strava_heatmap_military_base_locations/
  15. Claverie, B., Du Cluzel, F., Danis, É., & Moinet, N. (2022). “Cognitive warfare”: The advent of the concept of “cognitics” in the field of warfare. In Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance (pp. 17). NATO Science and Technology Organization. https://hal.science/hal-03635889v1
  16. Cobbe, J. (2021). Algorithmic censorship by social platforms: Power and resistance. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 739766. 10.1007/s13347-020-00429-0
  17. de Bruijn, H., & Janssen, M. (2017). Building cybersecurity awareness: The need for evidence-based framing strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X17300540?via%3Dihub
  18. Deppe, C. (2023). Disinformation in cognitive warfare, foreign information manipulation and interference, and hybrid threats. The Defence Horizon Journal, 4(10), 121. 10.5281/zenodo.10005171
  19. Dhondt, K., Le Pochat, V., Voulimeneas, A., Joosen, W., & Volckaert, S. (2022). A run a day won’t keep the hacker away: Inference attacks on endpoint privacy zones in fitness tracking social networks. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 801814). 10.1145/3548606.3560616
  20. Eldh, A. C., Årestedt, L., & Berterö, C. (2020). Quotations in qualitative studies: Reflections on constituents, custom, and purpose. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920969268. 10.1177/1609406920969268
  21. Ellingsen, D., Lilleaas, U.-B., & Kimmel, M. (2016). Something is working—but why? Mixed rooms in the Norwegian army. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(3), 151164. 10.1080/08038740.2016.1236037
  22. ENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity). (2023). ENISA Threat Landscape 2023: July 2022 to June 2023 (11th edition, Catalogue number TP-AE-23-001-EN, ISSN 2363-3050, ISBN 978-92-9204-645-3). Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2023
  23. Eriksen, T. H. (2017). What is Anthropology? Pluto Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1pv89ct
  24. Evans, J. (2022). War in the age of TikTok. Russian Analytical Digest, 280, 1719. 10.3929/ethz-b-000538061
  25. Fangen, K. (2010). Deltagende observasjon (2. Utgave). Fagbokforlaget. https://www.nb.no/items/URN:NBN:no-nb_digibok_2011041308072
  26. Finkelstein, L. M., King, E. B., & Voyles, E. C. (2015). Age metastereotyping and cross-age workplace interactions: a meta view of age stereotypes at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1), 2640. 10.1093/workar/wau002
  27. Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics and the governance of the digital. Philosophy & Technology, 31(1), 18. 10.1007/s13347-018-0303-9
  28. Frederick, B., Charap, S., Boston, S., Flanagan, S. J., Mazarr, M. J., Moroney, J. D. P., & Mueller, K. P. (2022). Pathways to Russian Escalation Against NATO from the Ukraine War. Rand Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA1971-1.html
  29. Frey, S. (2018). How to eliminate the prevailing ignorance and complacency around cybersecurity. Cybersecurity Best Practices: Lösungen zur Erhöhung der Cyberresilienz für Unternehmen und Behörden, 110. https://www.springerprofessional.de/cybersecurity-best-practices/15968958?tocPage=1
  30. Geertz, C. (1973a). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books. https://hci.stanford.edu/courses/cs376/private/readings/geertz_thick_description.pdf
  31. Geertz, C. (1973b). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures (pp. 330). Basic Books. Retrieved from http://hypergeertz.jku.at/GeertzTexts/Geertz%20Interpretation%20of%20Cultures%201973.pdf
  32. Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Red.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (s. 0). The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
  33. Giordano, P. (2023, April 5). Cognitive warfare: strengthening and defending the mind. NATO’s ACT. https://www.act.nato.int/article/cognitive-warfare-strengthening-and-defending-the-mind/
  34. Hannerz, U. (2010). Anthropology’s world: life in a twenty-first century discipline. Pluto Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353866203_Anthropology%27s_World_Life_in_a_Twenty-First_Century_Discipline
  35. Hansen, M. B. (2025). Integration af offensive cyberoperationer (OCO) teknologisk, organisatorisk og doktrinært i Multi-Domain Operations (MDO). Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 8(1). 10.31374/sjms.341
  36. Hellum, N. (2014). “Sminkedritt over hele vasken” – en kvalitativ feltstudie av kjønnsblandede rom og maskulinitetskultur i Forsvaret (FFI-rapport 2014/02156). Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt. https://www.ffi.no/en/publications-archive/sminkedritt-over-hele-vasken-en-kvalitativ-feltstudie-av-kjonnsblandede-rom-og-maskulinitetskultur-i-forsvaret
  37. Hellum, N. (2017). “Not focussing on whether it’s a spout or a handle”—An anthropological study on even gender balance among conscripts in a Norwegian Air Force battalion (FFI-rapport 17/01196). Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt. https://www.ffi.no/en/publications-archive/not-focussing-on-whether-its-a-spout-or-a-handle-an-anthropological-study-on-even-gender-balance-among-conscripts-in-a-norwegian-air-force-battalion
  38. Hern, A. (2018, January 28). Fitness tracking app Strava gives away location of secret US army bases. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/28/fitness-tracking-app-gives-away-location-of-secret-us-army-bases
  39. Hong, W. C. H., Chi, C., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Lei, V. N.-L., & Xu, X. (2023). The influence of social education level on cybersecurity awareness and behaviour: A comparative study of university students and working graduates. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 439470. 10.1007/s10639-022-11121-5
  40. Hoppa, M. A. (2021). From lessons learned to improvements implemented: some roles for gaming in cybersecurity risk management. In Advances in Cybersecurity Management (s. 289314). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-71381-2_14
  41. Jain, A. K., Sahoo, S. R., & Kaubiyal, J. (2021). Online social networks security and privacy: Comprehensive review and analysis. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(5), 21572177. 10.1007/s40747-021-00409-7
  42. Jeong, J., Mihelcic, J., Oliver, G., & Rudolph, C. (2025). Towards an improved understanding of human factors in cybersecurity. In Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC) (pp. 338345). IEEE. 10.1109/CIC48465.2019.00047
  43. Jonsson, E., Salo, M., Lillemae, E., Steder, F., Ferst, T., Kasearu, K., Novagrockiene, J., Österberg, J., Sederholm, T., Svensén, S., Tresch, T., & Truusa, T.-T. (2024). Multifaceted conscription: a comparative study of six european countries. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 7, 1933. 10.31374/sjms.166
  44. Jøsok, Ø., Knox, B. J., Helkala, K., Lugo, R. G., Sütterlin, S., & Ward, P. (2016). Exploring the hybrid space: Theoretical framework applying cognitive science in military cyberspace operations. Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience: 10th International Conference, AC 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17–22, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 10, 178188. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39952-2_18
  45. Jowsey, T., Braun, V., Clarke, V., Lupton, D., & Fine, M. (2025). We reject the use of generative artificial intelligence for reflexive qualitative research (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5676462). Social Science Research Network. 10.2139/ssrn.5676462
  46. Karasz, P. (2019, February 21). Social media posts reveal NATO soldiers’ activities, report says. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/world/europe/nato-social-media.html
  47. Kaspersen, I. S. (2023). Accepted as soldiers? Exploring female identity performance and whistleblowing dynamics in the Norwegian army. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 6(1). 10.31374/sjms.183
  48. Khadka, K., & Ullah, A. B. (2025). Human factors in cybersecurity: An interdisciplinary review and framework proposal. International Journal of Information Security, 24(3), 119. 10.1007/s10207-025-01032-0
  49. Knight, M., Voitovych, O., Carey, A., Lister, T., & Pennington, J. (2023, July 12) Russian commander killed while jogging may have been tracked on Strava app. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/11/europe/russian-submarine-commander-killed-krasnador-intl
  50. Knox, B. J., Jøsok, Ø., Helkala, K., Khooshabeh, P., Ødegaard, T., Lugo, R. G., & Sütterlin, S. (2018). Socio-technical communication: The hybrid space and the OLB model for science-based cyber education. Military Psychology, 30(4), 295304. 10.1080/08995605.2018.1478546
  51. Køber, P. K. (2015). Velger Forsvaret de rette ungdommene—Analyse av seleksjon, gjennomføring og frafall i førstegangstjeneste 2010–2014. https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/velger-forsvaret-de-rette-ungdommene-analyse-av-seleksjon-gjennomforing-og-frafall-i-forstegangstjeneste-2010-2014
  52. Krasznay, C., & Hámornik, B. P. (2019). Human Factors Approach to Cybersecurity Teamwork–The Military Perspective. Advances in Military Technology, 14(2), 291305. 10.3849/aimt.01296
  53. Lif, P., Granåsen, M., & Sommestad, T. (2017). Development and validation of technique to measure cyber situation awareness. 2017 International Conference On Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics And Assessment (Cyber SA), 18. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8073388
  54. Maciata, K. (2025, May 5). NATO Review—Fortifying the Baltic Sea—NATO’s defence and deterrence strategy for hybrid threats. NATO Review. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2025/05/05/fortifying-the-baltic-sea-natos-defence-and-deterrence-strategy-for-hybrid-threats/index.html
  55. Malmedal, B., Røislien, H. E., Nyheim, M., & Nyheim, M. (2016). The Norwegian cyber security culture (NorSIS-rapport). NorSIS. https://norsis.no/content/uploads/2022/05/The-Norwegian-Cybersecurity-culture-web.pdf
  56. Malmio, I. (2025). Imagining the Impossible—Conflicting Norms and Values on Social Sustainability, Security, and Artificial Intelligence [Doctoral Thesis]. Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University. https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/217803194/Irja_Malmio_-_WEBB.pdf
  57. Martínez, F., Guevara, F., Sánchez, L. E., & Santos-Olmo, A. (2023). Cybersecurity: A general framework in the maritime and military world. Ship science & technology, 17(33), 5160. 10.25043/19098642.242
  58. Masakowski, Y., & Blatny, J. M. (Eds.). (2023). Mitigating and responding to cognitive warfare (STO-TR-HFM-ET-356). NATO Science and Technology Organization. https://www.sto.nato.int/document/mitigating-and-responding-to-cognitive-warfare-2/
  59. Mattingsdal, J., Espevik, R., Johnsen, B. H., & Hystad, S. (2024). Exploring why police and military commanders do what they do: An empirical analysis of decision-making in hybrid warfare. Armed Forces & Society, 50(4), 12181244. 10.1177/0095327X2311607
  60. McGranahan, C. (2021). The truths of anonymity: Ethnographic credibility and the problem with pseudonyms. American Ethnologist. https://americanethnologist.org/online-content/collections/rethinking-pseudonyms-in-ethnography/the-truths-of-anonymity-ethnographic-credibility-and-the-problem-with-pseudonyms/
  61. Mink, J., Yuile, A. R., Pal, U., Aviv, A. J., & Bates, A. (2022). Users can deduce sensitive locations protected by privacy zones on fitness tracking apps. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 121. 10.1145/3491102.3502136
  62. Moallem, A. (2018). Do you really trust “privacy policy” or “terms of use” agreements without reading them? In D. Nicholson (Red.), Advances in Human Factors in Cybersecurity (s. 290295). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-60585-2_27
  63. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 118. 10.1177/16094069231205789
  64. NATO. (2022). NATO 2022—Strategic concept. https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/
  65. NATO Allied Air Command. (2025, May 30). Norway, U.S. pioneer weapons integration, enhance NATO interoperability during Formidable Shield 25. Ac.Nato.Int. https://ac.nato.int/archive/2025-2/norway--us-pioneer-weapons-integration--enhance-nato-interoperability-.aspx
  66. Nobles, C. (2018). Botching human factors in cybersecurity in business organizations. HOLISTICA Journal of Business and Public Administration, 9(3), 7188. 10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0026
  67. Notaker, H. (2023). In the blind spot: Influence operations and sub-threshold situational awareness in Norway. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(3), 595623. 10.1080/01402390.2022.2039634
  68. Österberg, J., Nilsson, J., & Hellum, N. (2020). The motivation to serve in the military among Swedish and Norwegian soldiers: A comparative study. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 11(1), 3042. https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/the-motivation-to-serve-in-the-military-among-swedish-and-norwegian-soldiers.a-comparative-study
  69. Panourgiá, N. (2002). Interview with Clifford Geertz. Anthropological Theory, 2(4), 421431. 10.1177/14634990260620530
  70. Park, H. K., Kim, M. S., Park, M., & Lee, K. (2017). Cyber situational awareness enhancement with regular expressions and an evaluation methodology. In Proceedings of the MILCOM 2017 – IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) (pp. 406411). IEEE. 10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170864
  71. Paulus, T. M. (2023). Using qualitative data analysis software to support digital research workflows. Human Resource Development Review, 22(1), 139148. 10.1177/15344843221138381
  72. Pollini, A., Callari, T. C., Tedeschi, A., Ruscio, D., Save, L., Chiarugi, F., & Guerri, D. (2022). Leveraging human factors in cybersecurity: An integrated methodological approach. Cognition, Technology & Work, 24(2), 371390. 10.1007/s10111-021-00683-y
  73. Primig, F., Szabó, H. D., & Lacasa, P. (2023). Remixing war: An analysis of the reimagination of the Russian–Ukraine war on TikTok. Frontiers in Political Science. 10.3389/fpos.2023.1085149
  74. Reding, D. F., & Wells, B. (2022). Cognitive warfare: NATO, COVID-19 and the impact of emerging and disruptive technologies. In COVID-19 Disinformation: A Multi-National, Whole of Society Perspective (s. 2545). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-94825-2
  75. Rinaldo, R., & Guhin, J. (2022). How and why interviews work: ethnographic interviews and meso-level public culture. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(1), 3467. 10.1177/0049124119882471
  76. Roelsgaard Obling, A., & Victor Tillberg, L. (2021). Transformations of the military profession and professionalism in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Military Studies, 4(1), 115. 10.31374/book2
  77. Rohan, R., Funilkul, S., Pal, D., & Chutimaskul, W. (2021). Understanding of human factors in cybersecurity: a systematic literature review. 2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE), 133140. 10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358
  78. Rones, N. (2017). Gender-Mixed Army Dorm Rooms, 50% Women and All-Female Special Forces Training: How does Norway’s radical attempt to integrate women in the military work? Res Militaris, 7(2), 128. https://www.ffi.no/en/publications-archive/gender-mixed-army-dorm-rooms-50-women-and-all-female-special-forces-training-how-does-norways-radical-attempt-to-integrate-women-in-the-military-work
  79. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2. ed). SAGE Publ.
  80. Sangwan, A. (2024). Human factors in cybersecurity awareness. 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Cybersecurity (ISCS), 17. 10.1109/ISCS61804.2024.10581139
  81. Schubert, K. D., & Barrett, D. (2024). Data governance, privacy, and ethics. In M. C. Lacity & L. Coon (Red.), Human Privacy in Virtual and Physical Worlds: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (s. 87110). Springer Nature Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-031-51063-2_5
  82. Singer, P. W., & Brooking, E. T. (2018). LikeWar: The weaponization of social media. Eamon Dolan Books.
  83. Skjelland, E., Glærum, S., Nyhamar, T., & Sendstad, C. (2025). Forsvarsanalysen 2025 (FFI-rapport 25/006). Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt. https://www.ffi.no/publikasjoner/arkiv/forsvarsanalysen-2025
  84. Skopik, F., Bonitz, A., Grantz, V., & Göhler, G. (2022). From scattered data to actionable knowledge: Flexible cyber security reporting in the military domain. International Journal of Information Security, 21(6), 13231347. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10207-022-00613-7
  85. Skredderhaug, B. (2023). A threat to operational security—analysing information disclosure to third parties in apps used by soldiers aged 19–22 [Master thesis, NTNU]. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/3120372
  86. Squires, S., & Shade, M. (2015). People, the weak link in cyber-security: can ethnography bridge the gap? Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2015(1), 4757. 10.1111/1559-8918.2015.01039
  87. Steder, F. B. (2025). Conscription in Norway. In Conscription as Subject of National Security (s. 93111). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-47545-1_5
  88. Strand, S. (2021). The ”Scandinavian model” of military conscription: A formula for democratic defence forces in 21st century Europe? (Policy Analysis, Österreichisches Institut für Internationale Politik, 5). Österreichisches Institut für Internationale Politik. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-77365-1
  89. Sulaiman, N. S., Yacob, A., Aziz, N. S., Samsudin, N., Mohamed, W. A. A. W., Rahman, S. A., Hassan, W. N. I. T. M., Nasir, A., Wahab, S. F. A., & Othman, W. R. W. (2022). A review of cyber security awareness (CSA) among young generation: issue and countermeasure. In M. Al-Emran, M. A. Al-Sharafi, M. N. Al-Kabi, & K. Shaalan (Red.), Proceedings of International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems (s. 957967). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-85990-9_76
  90. Tempestini, G., Rovira, E., Pyke, A., & Di Nocera, F. (2023). The Cybersecurity Awareness INventory (CAIN): Early Phases of Development of a Tool for Assessing Cybersecurity Knowledge Based on the ISO/IEC 27032. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 3(1), 118. 10.3390/jcp3010005
  91. Turner, V. W. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual (Vol. 101). Cornell university press.
  92. Von Solms, R., & Van Niekerk, J. (2013). From information security to cyber security. computers & security, 38, 97102. 10.1016/j.cose.2013.04.004
  93. Vorhölter, J. (2021). Anthropology anonymous? Pseudonyms and confidentiality as challenges for ethnography in the twenty-first century. Ethnoscripts, 23(1), 1533. https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/ethnoscripts/article/view/1652
  94. Weiss, D., & Zhang, X. (2020). Multiple sources of aging attitudes: perceptions of age groups and generations from adolescence to old age across China, Germany, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(6), 407423. 10.1177/0022022120925904
  95. Woolf, N. H., & Silver, C. (2017). Qualitative analysis using MAXQDA: The five-level QDATM method. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315268569
  96. Woolley, S. C. (2022). Digital propaganda: The power of influencers. Journal of Democracy, 33(3), 115129. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/860232
  97. Yerby, J., & Vaughn, I. (2022). Deliberately confusing language in terms of service and privacy policy agreements. Issues in Information Systems, 23(2). 10.48009/2_iis_2022_112
  98. Young, H., van Vliet, T., van de Ven, J., Jol, S., & Broekman, C. (2018). Understanding human factors in cyber security as a dynamic system. Advances in Human Factors in Cybersecurity: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity, July 17– 21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA 8, 244254. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:57827233
  99. Zhang, C., & Zhan, Y. (2025). Taking distinction practices seriously: Methodological reflections on ethnographic distance in fieldwork with marginalized people. American Anthropologist, 127(2), 308318. 10.1111/aman.28067
  100. Zwilling, M., Klien, G., Lesjak, D., Wiechetek, Ł., Cetin, F., & Basim, H. N. (2022). Cyber security awareness, knowledge and behavior: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(1), 8297. 10.1080/08874417.2020.1712269
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.455 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 98 - 118
Submitted on: Jul 12, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 4, 2026
Published on: Feb 25, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Nina Hellum, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.