Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance in the Baltic Region
References
- Adamsky, D. (2010). The culture of military innovation: The impact of cultural factors on the revolution in military affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Beardsley, K., & Asal, V. (2009). Winning with the bomb. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), 278–301. DOI: 10.1177/0022002708330386
- Bell, M. S., & Miller, N. L. (2015). Questioning the effect of nuclear weapons on conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(1), 74–92. DOI: 10.1177/0022002713499718
- Bernard, B. (1946). The absolute weapon. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
- Betts, R. K. (1987) Nuclear blackmail and nuclear balance in the Baltic region. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
- Chekinov, S. G., & Bogdanov, S. A. (2011). Vliyanie Nepryamykh Deistvii na Kharakter Soveremennoi Voiny. Voennaya Mysl’, (6), 3–13.
- Colby, E. (2016). The role of nuclear weapons in the U.S.-Russian relationship. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Task Force White Paper. Retrieved from
https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/02/26/role-of-nuclear-weapons-in-u.s.-russian-relationship-pub-62901 - Coté, O. R.,
Jr. (2003). The third battle: Innovation in the U.S. Navy’s silent Cold War struggle with Soviet submarines. Newport Paper, 16. Newport, RI: Naval War College. DOI: 10.21236/ADA421957 - Davis, M. (2017, January 18). The scary reasons NATO (and the world) should fear Russia’s nuclear weapons. National Interest. Retrieved from
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-scary-reasons-nato-the-world-should-fear-russias-nuclear-19091 - DELFI. (2016, October 8). Russia deploying Iskander at Lithuania border to get concessions from West. Retrieved from
https://en.delfi.lt/central-eastern-europe/russia-deploying-iskander-at-lithuanian-border-to-get-concessions-from-west.d?id=72503066 - Durkalec, J. (2015). Nuclear-backed ‘little green men’: Nuclear messaging in the Ukraine crisis. Report. Warsaw, Poland: Polish Institute of International Affairs.
- Durkalec, J., & Kroenig, M. (2016). NATO’s nuclear deterrence: Closing credibility gaps. Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 25(1), 37–50.
- Frühling, S., & Lasconjarias, G. (2016). NATO, A2/AD, and the Kaliningrad challenge. Survival, 58(2), 95–116. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1161906
- Gavin, F. J. (2001). The myth of flexible response: United States strategy in Europe during the 1960s. International History Review, 23(4), 847–875. DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2001.9640953
- Gavin, F. J. (2012). Nuclear statecraft: History and strategy in America’s atomic age. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Gavin, F. J. (2018). Rethinking the Bomb: Nuclear Weapons and American Grand Strategy. Texas National Security Review 2(1), 74–100.
- Green, B. R., & Long, A. (2017). The MAD who wasn’t there: Soviet reactions to the late Cold War nuclear balance. Security Studies, 26(4), 606–641. DOI: 10.1080/09636412.2017.1331639
- Gutterman, S., & Stewart, P. (2014, March 4). Russia test-fires ICBM amid tension over Ukraine. Reuters. Retrieved from
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-missile/russia-test-fires-icbm-amid-tension-over-ukraine-idUSBREA231ZC20140304 - H-Diplo/ISSF. (2014, June 15). What we talk about when we talk about nuclear weapons (H-Diplo/ISSF Forum, 2). Retrieved from
https://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Forum-2.pdf - Jervis, R. (1984). The illogic of American nuclear strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Jervis, R. (1989). The meaning of the nuclear revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kartapolov, A. V. (2015). Uroki Voennykh Konflictov, Perspektivy Razvitiya Sredstv i Sposobov ikh Vedeniya. Pryamye Nepryamye Deistviya v Sovremennykh Mezhduranodnykh Konfliktov. Vestnik Akademii Voennykh Nauk 2.
- Kristensen, H. M. (2017, September 14). Russian nuclear forces: Buildup or modernization? Russia Matters. Retrieved from
https://www.russiamatters.org/analysis/russian-nuclear-forces-buildup-or-modernization - Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2013). Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945–2013. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 69(5), 75–81. DOI: 10.1177/0096340213501363
- Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2017). Russian nuclear forces, 2017. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73(2), 115–126. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2017.1290375
- Kroenig, M. (2013). Nuclear superiority and the balance of resolve: Explaining nuclear crisis outcomes. International Organization, 67(1), 141–171. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818312000367
- Kroenig, M. (2015). Facing reality: Getting NATO ready for a new Cold War. Survival, 57(1), 49–70. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2015.1008295
- Kühn, U., & Péczeli, A. (2017). Russia, NATO, and the INF Treaty. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 11(1), 66–99.
- Lanoszka, A. (2018). Tangled up in rose? Theories of alliance entrapment and the 2008 Russo-Georgian war. Contemporary Security Policy, 39(2), 234–257. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2017.1392102
- Lanoszka, A., & Hunzeker, M. A. (2016). Confronting the anti-access/area denial and precision strike challenge in the Baltic region. The RUSI Journal, 161(5), 12–18. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2016.1253367
- Lanoszka, A., & Hunzeker, M. A. (2019). Conventional deterrence and landpower in northeastern Europe. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College Press. Retrieved from
https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=1404 - Latvian, Estonian national guards drill for ‘little green men’. (2015, August 31). LSM. Retrieved from
https://eng.lsm.lv/article/society/society/latvian-estonian-national-guards-drill-for-little-green-men.a143629>/ - Lebow, R. N., & Stein, J. G. (1989). Rational deterrence theory: I think, therefore I deter. World Politics, 41(2), 208–224. DOI: 10.2307/2010408
- Lieber, K. A. (2005). War and the engineers: The primacy of politics over technology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2006). The rise of U.S. nuclear primacy. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 42–54. DOI: 10.2307/20031910
- Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence. International Security, 41(4), 9–47. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00273
- Long, A., & Green, B. G. (2015). Stalking the secure second strike: Intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1–2), 38–73. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2014.958150
- Luik, J., & Jermalavičius, T. (2017). A plausible scenario of nuclear war in Europe, and how to deter it: A perspective from Estonia. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73(4), 233–239. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2017.1338014
- Narang, V. (2014). Nuclear strategy in the modern era: Regional powers and international conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400850402
- North Atlantic Council. (2018, July 11). Brussels summit declaration: Issued by the heads of state and government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Brussels 11–12 July 2018. Retrieved from
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_156624.htm - Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2018, February). Nuclear posture review. Arlington, VA: U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved from
https://dod.defense.gov/News/SpecialReports/2018NuclearPostureReview.aspx - Paszewski, T. (2016). Can Poland defend itself? Survival, 58(2), 117–134. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1161907
- Podvig, P. (2018). Russia’s current nuclear modernization and arms control. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 1(2), 256–267. DOI: 10.1080/25751654.2018.1526629
- Raś, K., & Szeligowski, D. (2018, February 15). Lithuania: Ukraine’s advocate in the international arena. PISM Bulletin, 28(1099). Retrieved from
http://www.pism.pl/publications/bulletin/no-28-1099?wersja_pelna=1 - Rauchhaus, R. (2009). Evaluating the nuclear peace hypothesis: A quantitative approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), 258–278. DOI: 10.1177/0022002708330387
- Renz, B. (2016). Why Russia is reviving its conventional military power. Parameters, 46(2), 23–36.
- Russia threatens no one by deploying Iskander systems in Kaliningrad – Kremlin. (2018, June 2). Sputnik News. Retrieved from
https://sputniknews.com/russia/201802061061397301-russia-iskander-kaliningrad/ - Sechser, T., & Fuhrmann, M. (2013). Crisis bargaining and nuclear blackmail. International Organization, 67(1), 173–195. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818312000392
- Sechser, T. S., & Fuhrmann, M. (2017). Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316227305
- Shlapak, D. A., & Johnson, M. W. (2016). Reinforcing deterrence on NATO’s eastern flank: Wargaming the defense of the Baltics. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. DOI: 10.7249/RR1253
- Simón, L. (2014). Assessing NATO’s Eastern European ‘flank’. Parameters, 44(3), 67–79.
- Sokov, N. N., (2014, March 13). Why Russia calls a limited nuclear strike ‘de-escalation’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved from
https://thebulletin.org/2014/03/why-russia-calls-a-limited-nuclear-strike-de-escalation/ - Sukhankin, S. (2016, October 12). Russia flexes ‘Iskander’ muscles on its northwestern flank. Eurasia Daily Monitor, 13(163). Retrieved from
https://jamestown.org/program/russia-flexes-iskander-muscles-northwestern-flank/ - Thayer, B. A., & Skypek, T. M. (2013). Reaffirming the utility of nuclear weapons. Parameters, 42(4), 41–46.
- Veebel, V. (2018). (Un)justified expectations on nuclear deterrence of non-nuclear NATO members: The case of Estonia and Latvia? Defense & Security Analysis, 34(3), 291–309. DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2018.1500758
- Ven Bruusgaard, K. (2016). Russian strategic deterrence. Survival, 58(4), 7–26. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1207945
- Vladimir Putin: Russia boasts new missiles in state of the union address. (2018, March 1). DW. Retrieved from
http://www.dw.com/en/vladimir-putin-russia-boasts-new-missiles-in-state-of-the-union-address/a-42780312 - Woodward, B. (2018). Fear: Trump in the White House. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.22 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 94
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2018
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2019
Published on: Aug 21, 2019
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2019 Alexander Lanoszka, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.