NATO’s Response to Russian A2/AD in the Baltic States: Going Beyond Conventional?
References
- Alcazar, V. (2012). Crisis management and the anti-access/area denial problem. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 06(4), 42–70. Retrieved from
https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/SSQ/Archive/ - Army Technology. (n.d.). S-400 Triumph Air Defence Missile System. Retrieved from
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/s-400-triumph-air-defence-missile-system/ - Banks, M. (2018, March 15). NATO head Stoltenberg warns of Russia’s ‘reckless pattern’. Defense News. Retrieved from
https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2018/03/15/nato-head-stoltenberg-warns-of-russias-reckless-pattern/ - Barrie, D., & Gethin, H. (2018).
Russian weapons in the Syrian conflict . Russian Studies, 18(02), 1–11. Rome, Italy: NATO Defense College. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ndc.nato.int/news/news.php?icode=1169 - Biddle, S., & Oelrich, I. (2016). Future warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese anti-access/area denial, U.S. airsea battle, and command of the commons in East Asia. International Security, 41(1), 7–48. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00249
- Brookings Institution. (2012, May 16). Air-sea battle doctrine: A discussion with the chief of staff of the Air Force and chief of naval operations [Transcript]. Retrieved from
http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/events/2012/5/16%20air%20sea%20battle/20120516_air_sea_doctrine_corrected_transcript.pdf - Clark, W., Luik, J., Ramms, E., & Shirreff, R. (2016). Closing NATO’s Baltic gap. Retrieved from
https://icds.ee/closing-natos-baltic-gap/ - Eckel, M. (2018, January 24). Ex-U.S. Army commander warns of Russian capabilities in Ukraine. Radio Free Europe. Retrieved from
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-drones-artillery-ukrainian-forces/28994516.html - Fontaine, R., & Smith, J. (2015, April 2). Anti-access/area denial isn’t just for Asia anymore. Defense One. Retrieved from
http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2015/04/anti-accessarea-denial-isnt-just-asia-anymore/109108/ - Freedberg, S. J. (2015a, September 14). Russians ‘closed the gap’ for A2/Ad: Air Force Gen. Gorenc’. Breaking Defense. Retrieved from
http://breakingdefense.com/2015/09/russians-closed-the-gap-for-a2ad-air-force-gen-gorenc - Freedberg, S. J. (2015b, September 28). Russians in Syria building A2/AD ‘bubble’ over region: Breedlove. Breaking Defense. Retrieved from
http://breakingdefense.com/2015/09/russians-in-syria-building-a2ad-bubble-over-region-breedlove/ - Frühling, S., & Lasconjarias, G. (2016). NATO, A2/AD and the Kaliningrad challenge. Survival, 58(2), 95-116. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1161906
- Gatchel, T. L. (1996). At the water’s edge. Defending against the modern amphibious assault. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
- Hutchison, H. C. (2018, January 3). Here’s the treaty-busting missile Russia uses to threaten NATO. Business Insider. Retrieved from
http://www.businessinsider.com/treaty-busting-missile-russia-uses-to-threaten-nato-2018-1?IR=T - Ioniță, I. M., & Manea, O. (2015, November 5). Vershbow: NATO needs strategy to address threats from the south and the east. Defence Matters. Retrieved from
https://www.defencematters.org/news/vershbow-nato-needs-strategy-to-address-threats-from-the-south-and-the-east/410/ - Krepinevich, A. F., Watts, B., & Work, R. (2003). Meeting the anti-access and area denial challenge. Washington, DC: CSBA.
- Lasconjarias, G. (2013).
The NRF: From a key driver of transformation to a laboratory of the Connected Forces Initiative . Research Paper, 88, 1–8. Rome, Italy: NATO Defense College. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ndc.nato.int/research/research.php?icode=0 - Lasconjarias, G., & Marrone, A. (2016). How to respond to anti-access/area denial (A2/AD)? Towards a NATO counter-A2/AD strategy. NDC Conference Report, 16(01), 1–12. Rome, Italy:
NATO Defense College . Retrieved fromhttp://www.ndc.nato.int/news/news.php?icode=906 - Majumdar, D. (2016, June 29). Can America crush Russia’s A2/AD ‘bubbles’. The National Interest. Retrieved from
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/can-america-crush-russias-a2-ad-bubbles-16791 - Marten, K. (2017). Reducing tensions between Russia and NATO. Special report 79. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations Press. Retrieved from
https://www.cfr.org/report/reducing-tensions-between-russia-and-nato - McCarthy, C. J. (2010). Anti-access/area denial: The evolution of modern warfare. Newport, RI: US Naval War College. Retrieved from
https://www.usnwc.edu/Lucent/OpenPdf.aspx?id=95 - NATO. (2015, October
19 ). Joint press conference [Transcript]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_124035.htm - NATO. (2018). NATO’s enhanced forward presence. Fact sheet. Retrieved from
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_12/20181205_1812-factsheet_efp_en.pdf - Petraitis, D. (2018). The anatomy of Zapad-2017: Certain features of Russian military planning. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 16(1), 229–267. DOI: 10.2478/lasr-2018-0009
- Pothier, F. (2017). An area-access strategy for NATO. Survival, 59(3), 73–80. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2017.1325600
- Richardson, J. (2016, October 3). Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson: Deconstructing A2AD. The National Interest. Retrieved from
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/chief-naval-operations-adm-john-richardson-deconstructing-17918 - Schmitt, O. (2018). Allies that count. Junior partners in coalition warfare. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvvnh5h
- Shlapak, D. A., & Johnson, M. W. (2016). Reinforcing deterrence on NATO’s eastern flank: Wargaming the defense of the Baltics. RAND Research Report. DOI: 10.7249/RR1253
- Simón, L. (2017). Preparing NATO for the future – Operating in an increasingly contested environment. The International Spectator, 52(3), 121–135. DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2017.1283475
- Tangredi, S. J. (2013). Anti-access warfare. Countering A2/AD strategies. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
- Vego, M. (2009). Joint operational warfare. Newport, RI: US Naval War College. DOI: 10.4324/9780203889954.ch7
- Zapfe, M., & Haas, M. C. (2016). Access for allies? The RUSI Journal, 161(3), 34–41. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2016.1193355
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.18 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 74 - 83
Submitted on: Dec 6, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2019
Published on: Aug 21, 2019
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2019 Guillaume Lasconjarias, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.