Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Military Security and Research Ethics: Using Principles of Research Ethics to Navigate Military Security Dilemmas Cover

Military Security and Research Ethics: Using Principles of Research Ethics to Navigate Military Security Dilemmas

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Adams, T. E., Holman Jones, S., & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography. Oxford University press. https://books.google.dk/books/about/Autoethnography.html?id=ygV_BAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y. DOI: 10.4324/9781315427812
  2. ALLEA. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity Revised Edition. ALLEA – All European Academies.
  3. Barbour, C. (2017). Derrida’s secret: Perjury, testimony, oath. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781474425018
  4. Ben-Ari, E., & Levy, Y. (2012). Getting Access to the Field. In Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203093801.ch2
  5. Caforio, G. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of the sociology of the military. Springer. DOI: 10.4324/9780429398186
  6. De Goede, M., Bosma, E., & Pallister-Wilkins, P. (2019). Secrecy and Methods in Security Research: A Guide to Qualitative Fieldwork (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429398186
  7. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016. On the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
  8. Forsvarskommandoen. (2023). Bestemmelser for den militære sikkerhedstjeneste FKOBST 358-1. The Danish Defence Command (DCD)/Forsvarskommandoen.
  9. Griffith, A. I. (1998). Insider/Outsider: Epistemological Privilege and Mothering Work. Human Studies, 21(4), 361376. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005421211078
  10. King, A. (2019). Command: The twenty-first-century general. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108642941
  11. Lindley-French, J., & Boyer, Y. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of war (1. publ. in paperback). Oxford Univ. Press.
  12. Lippert, R. K., Walby, K., & Wilkinson, B. (2016). Spins, Stalls, and Shutdowns: Pitfalls of Qualitative Policing and Security Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(10).
  13. Mercer, J. (2007). The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 117. DOI: 10.1086/225294
  14. Merton, R. K. (1972). Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 947. DOI: 10.1086/225294
  15. Ministry of Higher Education and Science. (2014). Danish code of conduct for research integrity. Ministry of Higher Education and Science.
  16. Moore, B. L. (2014). In-depht interviewing. In J. Soeters, P. M. Shields, & S. Rietjens (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies (1st ed.). Routledge.
  17. NATO. (2020). C-M(2002)49-REV1.
  18. Pedersen, T. R. (2021). Facing the Warrior: An Ethnographic Montage on Post-9/11 Warriorisation of Danish Military Professions. In A. R. Obling & L. V. Tillberg (Eds.), Transformations of the Military Profession and Professionalism in Scandinavia. The Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies Press. DOI: 10.31374/book2-e
  19. Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616632. DOI: 10.1177/1468794114550439
  20. Schwell, A. (2019). Navigating Difficult Terrain. In M. De Goede, E. Bosma, & P. Pallister-Wilkins (Eds.), Secrecy and Methods in Security Research: A Guide to Qualitative Fieldwork (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429398186
  21. Shakoor, T. R. (2022). The Intelligence Cycle in Denmark: Unwinding and reconceptualising the Process of formulating Intelligence Requirements surrounding the Middle East in the Danish Defence Intelligence Service [Syddansk Universitet. Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet]. https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/en/publications/the-intelligence-cycle-in-denmark-unwinding-and-reconceptualising. DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2023.2193133
  22. Shakoor, T. R. (2023). Unwinding the Intelligence Cycle in Denmark. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 119. DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2023.2193133
  23. Sjøgren, S. (2023a). War, PowerPoint, and hypnotised chickens. STS Encounters, 15(2). DOI: 10.7146/stse.v15i2.139807
  24. Sjøgren, S. (2023b). What we disagree about when we disagree about doctrine. Journal of Strategic Studies. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2023.2251170
  25. Soeters, J., Shields, P. M., & Rietjens, S. J. H. (Eds.). (2014). Routledge handbook of research methods in military studies. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9780203093801
  26. Sookermany, A. M. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Military Sciences. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02866-4
  27. Stahlke Wall, S. (2016). Toward a Moderate Autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 160940691667496. DOI: 10.1177/1609406916674966
  28. Storm Jensen, M. (2023). Offensive Cyber Capabilities and Alliances: Questionable Assets for Prestige, New Risks of Entrapment [Syddansk Universitet. Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet]. DOI: 10.21996/F1K8-7974
  29. Thomson, D., Bzdel, L., Golden-Biddle, K., Reay, T., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2005). Central Questions of Anonymization: A Case Study of Secondary Use of Qualitative Data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1, Art. 29), 18.
  30. Tolich, M. (2004). Internal Confidentiality: When Confidentiality Assurances Fail Relational Informants. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 101106. DOI: 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015546.20441.4a
  31. Walker, D. (2016). Putting “Insider-ness” to work: Researching Identity Narratives of Career Soldiers About to Leave the Army. In A. Williams, K. N. Jenkings, M. F. Rech, & R. Woodward (Eds.), The Routledge companion to military research methods. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  32. Wegener, C. (2012, August 29). “Would you like coffee?” Using the researcher’s insider and outsider positions as a sensitizing concept in a cross-organisational field study. Liverpool, United Kingdom: Ethnographic Horizons in Times of Turbulence.
  33. Williams, A., Jenkings, K. N., Rech, M. F., & Woodward, R. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge companion to military research methods. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9781315613253
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.185 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 34 - 47
Submitted on: Oct 28, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2024
Published on: Mar 5, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Søren Sjøgren, Jakob Clod Asmund, Maya Mynster Christensen, Karina Mayland, Thomas Randrup Pedersen, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.