Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Taking One for the Team: Legal Consequences of Misconduct by Partners Cover

Taking One for the Team: Legal Consequences of Misconduct by Partners

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Aksenova, M. (2016). Complicity in International Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199796953-0152
  2. Al-Saadoon & Mufdhi v. United Kingdom. (2010). European Court of Human Rights (61498/08). Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
  3. Al-Skeini v. United Kingdom. (2011). European Court of Human Rights (55721/07). Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105606
  4. Arms Trade Treaty [ATT]. (2013). Retrieved from https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-8&chapter=26&clang=_en
  5. Aust, H. (2011). Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511862632
  6. Aust, H. (2015). The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy: An Effective Mechanism against Complicity of Peacekeeping Forces? Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 20(1), 6173. DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/kru011
  7. Boutin, B. (2017). Attribution of Conduct in International Military Operations: A Causal Analysis of Effective Control. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 18(2), 154179.
  8. Boutin, B. (2018). Responsibility in Connection with the Conduct of Military Partners. Military Law and the Law of War Review, 56, 5791.
  9. Breau, S. (2011). A Single Standard for Coalitions: Lowest Common Denominator or Highest Standard? In M. Odello and R. Piotrowicz (Eds.), International Military Missions and International Law (pp. 7397). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1163/9789004215900_005
  10. Brehm, M. (2007). The Arms Trade and States’ Duty to Ensure Respect for Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 12(3), 359387. DOI: 10.1093/jcsl/krn006
  11. Campaign Against the Arms Trade v. Secretary of State for International Trade. (2019). England and Wales Court of Appeal, T3/2017/2079. Retrieved from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CAAT-v-Secretary-of-State-and-Others-Open-12-June-2019.pdf
  12. Clapham, A., Casey-Maslen, S., Giacca, G., & Parker, S. (2016). The Arms Trade Treaty: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment [Convention against Torture, CAT]. (1984). Retrieved from https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
  14. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide [Genocide Convention]. (1948). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide-convention.shtml
  15. Crawford, J. (2013). State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139033060
  16. Daniel Turp v. Minister of Foreign Affairs. (2017). Federal Court of Canada 2017 FC 84. Retrieved from http://canlii.ca/t/gx77j
  17. Dannenbaum, T. (2010). Translating the Standard of Effective Control into a System of Effective Accountability: How Liability Should Be Apportioned for Violations of Human Rights by Member State Troops Contingents as United Nations Peacekeepers. Harvard International Law Journal, 51, 113192.
  18. >Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda. (2005). International Court of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/116/116-20051219-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
  19. Droege, C. (2008). Transfers of Detainees – Legal Framework, Non-Refoulement and Contemporary Challenges. International Review of the Red Cross, 90(871), 669701. DOI: 10.1017/S1560775508000102
  20. Droege, C., & Tuck, D. (2017, October 17). Fighting Together and International Humanitarian Law: Ensuring Respect for the Law and Assessing Responsibility for Violations. ICRC blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2017/10/17/
  21. Egan, B. (2016). Legal Advisor, U.S. Department of State, Address at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Washington DC, 1 April 2016. Retrieved from www.lawfareblog.com/state-department-legal-adviser-brian-egans-speech-asil
  22. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [European Convention on Human Rights, ECHR]. (1950). Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
  23. Ferraro, T. (2013). The Applicability and Application of International Humanitarian Law to Multinational Forces. International Review of the Red Cross, 95(891/892), 561612. DOI: 10.1017/S181638311400023X
  24. Finucan, B. (2016). Partners and Legal Pitfalls. International Law Studies, 92, 407431
  25. Geneva Conventions of 1949 [Geneva Convention I, II, III, and IV]. (1949). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/vwTreaties1949.xsp
  26. Goodman, R. (2016a, September 1). The Law of Aiding and Abetting (Alleged) War Crimes. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/32656
  27. Goodman, R. (2016b, September 22). Two U.S. Positions on the Duty to Ensure Respect for the Geneva Conventions. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/33166
  28. Goodman, R. (2018, May 14). Legal Limits on Military Assistance to Proxy Forces: Pathways for State and Official Responsibility. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/56272
  29. Goodman, R., & Lanovoy, V. (2016, December 22). State Responsibility for Assisting Armed Groups: A Legal Risk Analysis. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/35790
  30. Hakimi, M. (2016, September 21). US Responsibility Arising From Russian Violations of the Law of Armed Conflict. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/33075
  31. Henriksen, A. (2017). International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  32. Henriksen, A. (2018, June 22). Detainees in Iraq Win Damages from Denmark in High Court Ruling. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/58340
  33. Hess v. United Kingdom. (1975). European Commission of Human Rights (6231/73). Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-73854
  34. Ilaşcu v. Moldova and the Russian Federation. (2004). European Court of Human Rights (48787/99). Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
  35. International Committee of the Red Cross [ICRC]. (2012). Occupation and Other Forms of Administration of Foreign Territory. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-4094.pdf
  36. International Committee of the Red Cross [ICRC]. (2016). Commentary on the First Geneva Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316755709
  37. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR]. (1966). Retrieved from https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
  38. International Law Commission [ILC]. (2001). Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (A/56/83). Retrieved from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf
  39. International Law Commission [ILC]. (2006). Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law – Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (A/CN.4/L.682). Retrieved from: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G06/610/77/PDF/G0661077.pdf?OpenElement
  40. International Law Commission [ILC]. (2011). Responsibility of International Organizations (A/66/10). Retrieved from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_11_2011.pdf
  41. Jackson, M. (2015). Complicity in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736936.001.0001
  42. Jackson‚ M. (2016). Freeing Soering: The ECHR, State Complicity in Torture and Jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 27(3), 81730. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chw038
  43. Kretzmer, D. (2005). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence? European Journal of International Law, 16(2), 171212. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chi114
  44. Milanović, M. (2011). Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Law, Principles, and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696208.001.0001
  45. Mothers of Srebrenica v. The Netherlands. (2014). Hague District Court, C/09/295247. Retrieved from https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2014:8748
  46. Moynihan, H. (2016). Aiding and Assisting: Challenges in Armed Conflict and Counterterrorism. Chatham House Report. Retrieved from www.chathamhouse.org/publication/aiding-and-assisting-challenges-armed-conflict-and-counterterrorism
  47. Operation Green Desert. (2018). High Court of Eastern Denmark, B-3448-14. Retrieved from www.domstol.dk/oestrelandsret/nyheder/domsresumeer/Pages/DomiIraksagen.aspx
  48. Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom. (2012). European Court of Human Rights, 8139/09. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
  49. Ramstein Air Base. (2019). Higher Administrative Court of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia, 4 A 1361/15. Retrieved from http://www.ovg.nrw.de/behoerde/presse/pressemitteilungen/11_190319/Muendliche_Urteilsbegruendung.pdf.
  50. Reid, J. (2016, November 9). Ensuring Respect: The Role of State Practice in Interpreting the Geneva Conventions. ILA Reporter. Retrieved from http://ilareporter.org.au/2016/11/ensuring-respect-the-role-of-state-practice-in-interpreting-the-geneva-conventions-john-reid/
  51. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Statute [Rome Statute]. (1998). Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf
  52. Stein, T. (2003). Coalition Warfare and Differing Legal. Obligations of Coalition Members under International Humanitarian Law. International Law Studies, 78(1), 31535.
  53. United Nations Secretary General [UNSG]. (2013). Human Rights Due Diligence Policy on United Nations Support to Non-United Nations Security Forces (A/67/775-S/2013/110).
  54. United Nations Security Council [UNSC]. (2017). Resolution 2364 (S/RES/2364). Retrieved from http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/2364
  55. Van Schaack, B., & Whiting, A. (2017, January 26). Understanding Complicity: When the US Makes a “Substantial Contribution” to War Crimes Committed by Foreign Partners. Just Security. Retrieved from www.justsecurity.org/36748
  56. Zwanenburg, M. (2017, September 26). The Obligation to “Ensure Respect” for IHL: the Debate Continues. Intercross Blog. Retrieved from http://intercrossblog.icrc.org/blog/the-obligation-to-ensure-respect-for-ihl-the-debate-continues
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.16 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 54
Submitted on: Jan 3, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2019
Published on: Mar 23, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Cornelius Wiesener, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.