Tackling Strategic Simultaneity: What NATO Could Do to Adapt to the New Multitude of Threats
References
- Analysis and Recommendations of the Reflection Group appointed by the NATO Secretary General. (2020). NATO 2030. A New Vision for the Transatlantic Alliance, 25. November 2020.
- Arteaga, F. (2019).
“Adapting the Counterterrorism Toolbox to the Postcaliphate Context” . In Valasek, T. (Ed.), New Perspectives on Shared Security: NATO’s Next 70 Years. Carnegie Europe: 83–86. - Besch, S., & Bond, I. (2019). NATO at 70: Twilight years or a new dawn? Centre for European Reform: Insight, 3. April 2019.
https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_SB_IB_3.4.19.pdf - Brauss, H. (2020).
“The Need for the Alliance to Adapt Further” . In Olsen, J. A. (Eds.), Future NATO. Adapting to New Realities. London: RUSI Whitehall paper 95, pp. 131–144. DOI: 10.1080/02681307.2019.1731219 - Bryson, J. M., Kimberly, B. B., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). “Strategic Orientation and Ambidextrous Public Organizations. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process: A Reflection on the Research Perspective of Raymond Miles and Charles Snow”. Paper presented at the Economic and Social Research Council hosted by Cardiff University. December 3–5, 2008.
- Davis, P. K. (2018). “Defense planning when major changes are needed.” Defence Studies, 18(3), 374–390. DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2018.1497444
- The Economist. (2019). “Emanuel Macron warns Europe: Nato is becoming braindead” 07.11.2019
https://www.economist.com/europe/2019/11/07/emmanuel-macron-warns-europe-nato-is-becoming-brain-dead (accessed 27.04.2022). - Efjestad, S., & Tamnes, R. (2020).
“NATO’s Enduring Relevance . In Olsen, J. A. (Ed.), Future NATO. Adapting to New Realities. London: RUSI Whitehall paper 95, pp. 8–25. DOI: 10.1080/02681307.2019.1731206 - GLOBSEC. (2017). One Alliance. The Future Tasks of an Adapted Alliance.
https://www.globsec.org/publications/one-alliance-future-tasks-adapted-alliance/ (accessed 21.01.2021). - Hallams, E., Ratti, L., & Zyla, B. (Eds.) (2013). NATO Beyond 9/11. The Transformation of the Atlantic Alliance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230391222
- Jakobsen, P. V. (2014).
“The Indispensable Enabler: NATO’s Strategic Value in High-Intensity Operations Is Far Greater Than You Think” . In Odgaard (Ed.), Strategy in NATO, 59–74. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137382054_5 - Jakobsen, P. V. (2022). “Theories of threat and theories of success – how causal theory can improve the formulation and validation of military strategy.” Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies.
- Jakobsen, P. V., & Ringsmose, J. (2018). “Victim of its own success: How NATO’s Difficulties are Caused by the Absence of a First-Order Threat.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 16(1), 38–58. DOI: 10.1080/14794012.2018.1423603
- Kaim, M. (2017). Reforming NATO’s Partnerships. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Research Paper, 1. Berlin.
- Karpavičiūtė, I. (2020).
“NATO’s Defence and Deterrence in a Changing Security Environment” . In Zemaitis, J. (Ed.), Lithuania in the Global Context: National Security and Defence Policy Dilemmas. Vilnius: Military Academy of Lithuania, pp. 131–150. - Kauppila, O.-P. (2010). “Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships.” Strategic Organization, 8(4), 283–312. DOI: 10.1177/1476127010387409
- March, J. G. (1991). “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science, 2, 71–87. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
- Mintzberg, H. (1987). “The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for Strategy.” California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24. DOI: 10.2307/41165263
- NATO. (2019a).
The Secretary General’s Annual Report . Bruxelles. Available onhttps://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/3/pdf_publications/sgar19-en.pdf (acessed on 22.01.2021). - NATO. (2019b). NATO: Ready for the Future. Adapting the Alliance (2018–2019). Bruxelles.
- NATO. (2021). NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats, 16. March, 2021. Available on
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_156338.htm (accessed 29.03.2021). - Oertel, J. (2020).
“NATO’s China Challenge” . Olsen, J. A. (Ed.), Future NATO. Adapting to New Realities. London: RUSI Whitehall paper, 95, 67–80. DOI: 10.1080/02681307.2019.1731211 - O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). “The Ambidextrous Organization.” Harvard Business Review. April (
https://hbr.org/2004/04/the-ambidextrous-organization , accessed 30.11.2020). - O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). “Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future.” Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 4. Available on
https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/O’Reilly%20and%20Tushman%20AMP%20Ms%20051413_c66b0c53-5fcd-46d5-aa16-943eab6aa4a1.pdf (accessed 18.01.2021). DOI: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025 - Reflection Group. (2020). NATO 2030. A New Vision for the Transatlantic Alliance. Analysis and Recommendations of the Reflection Group appointed by the NATO Secretary General. Available on
https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/12/pdf/201201-Reflection-Group-Final-Report-Uni.pdf - Wallander, C. A. (2000). “Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War.” International Organization, 54(4), 705–735. DOI: 10.1162/002081800551343
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.143 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 165 - 176
Submitted on: Jan 16, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 13, 2022
Published on: Sep 9, 2022
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2022 Anja Dalgaard-Nielsen, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.