References
- Adamsky, D. (2010). The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel. Stanford, US: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780804773805
- Agrell, W. (1985). Alliansfrihet och atombomber (1:1 ed.). Stockholm, Sweden: Liber Publishing.
- Ångström, J., & Honig, J. (2012). Regaining Strategy: Small Powers, Strategic Culture, and Escalation in Afghanistan. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(5), 663–687. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2012.706969
- Åselius, G. (2005). Swedish Strategic Culture after 1945. Cooperation and Conflict, 40(1), 25–44. DOI: 10.1177/0010836705049732
- Bahar Aşcı, H., Zehra Tan, F., & Altıntaş, F. (2016). A Strategic Approach For Learning Organizations: Mental Models. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 2–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.002
- Berman, L. (2012). Capturing Contemporary Innovation: Studying IDF Innovation against Hamas and Hizballah. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(1), 121–147. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2011.608933
- Bessette, D., Mayer, L., Cwik, B., Vezér, M., Keller, K., Lempert, R., & Tuana, N. (2017). Building a Values-Informed Mental Model for New Orleans Climate Risk Management. Risk Analysis, 37(10), 1993–2004. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12743
- Brantly, A. F. (2014). Cyber Actions by State Actors: Motivation and utility. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 27(3), 465–484. DOI: 10.1080/08850607.2014.900291
- Carter, C., Kaufmann, L., & Michel, A. (2007). Behavioral supply management: a taxonomy of judgement and decision-making biases. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(8), 631–669. DOI: 10.1108/09600030710825694
- DeGroot, G. (2004). The bomb, a life. The RUSI Journal, 149(3), 58–63. DOI: 10.1080/03071840408522950
- Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Oscarsson, H., Towns, A., & Wängnerud, L. (2017). Metodpraktikan (5th ed.). Stockholm, Sweden: Wolters Kluwer Sverige AB.
- Farrell, T., & Terriff, T. (2002). The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Farwell, J., & Rohozinski, R. (2011). Stuxnet and the Future of Cyber War. Survival, 53(1), 23–40. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2011.555586
- Finkel, M. (2011). On Flexibility - Recovery from Technological and Doctrinal Surprise on the Battlefield. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780804777155
- FOI. (2014). Hotbildsunderlag i utvecklingen av civilt försvar. Stockholm, Sweden: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut - FOI.
- FOI. (2018). Typfall 5: Utdragen och eskalerande gråzonsproblematik. Stockholm, Sweden: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut – FOI [the Swedish Defence Research Agency].
- Forssberg, O. (1987). Svensk kärnvapenforskning 1945–1972. Stockholm: Regeringskansliets offsetcentral [Office of the Government of Sweden].
- Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008
- George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- GoS. (1999). Europas säkerhet - Sveriges försvar. Stockholm, Sweden: försvarsdepartementet [department of defence].
- GoS. (2004). Vårt framtida försvar. Stockholm, Sweden: Regeringen [Government of Sweden].
- GoS. (2009). Ett användbart försvar. Stockholm, Sweden: Regeringen [Government of Sweden].
- GoS. (2017a). Motståndskraft; Inriktningen av totalförsvaret och utformningen av det civila försvaret 2021–2025. Stockholm, Sweden: Regeringskansliet [Office of the Government of Sweden].
- GoS. (2017b). Nationell strategi för samhällets informations- och cybersäkerhet. Stockholm, Sweden: Regeringskansliet [Office of the Government of Sweden].
- GoS. (2019). Värnkraft - Inriktningen av säkerhetspolitiken och utformningen av det militära försvaret 2021–2025. Stockholm, Sweden: försvarsdepartementet [department of defence].
- Gray, C. S. (1999). Strategic Culture as Context: the First Generation of Theory Strikes Back. Review of International Studies, 25(1), 49–69. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210599000492
- Grennert, J., & Tham, M. (2001). Att påverka konflikter med IT-vapen; Icke-statliga aktörers möjligheter till inverkan på konfliktförlopp. Stockholm, Sweden: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut – FOI [the Swedish Defence Research Agency].
- Griffin, S. (2017). Military Innovation Studies: Multidisciplinary or Lacking Discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), 196–224. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358
- Grissom, A. (2006). The future of military innovation studies. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), 905–934. DOI: 10.1080/01402390600901067
- Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1998). The Hidden Traps in Decision Making. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 47–58.
- Handel, M. I. (1987). Technological surprise in war. Intelligence and National Security, 2(1), 1–53. DOI: 10.1080/02684528708431875
- Heickerö, R. (2006). Informationskrig i cyberrymden. Elektronisk och digital krigföring i en breddad hotbild. Stockholm, Sweden: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut – FOI [the Swedish Defence Research Agency].
- Heickerö, R. (2008). Utveckling av strategier och förmåga till informationskrigföring och informationsoperationer i Kina. Stockholm, Sweden: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut - FOI.
- Heickerö, R. (2010). Emerging Cyber Threats and Russian Views on Information Warfare and Information Operations. Avdelningen för försvarsanalys. Stockholm, Sweden: FOI, Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut [the Swedish Defence Research Agency].
- Herzog, S. (2011). Revisiting the Estonian Cyber Attacks: Digital Threats and Multinational Responses. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(2), 49–60. DOI: 10.5038/1944-0472.4.2.3
- Hill, A., & Gerras, S. (2016). Systems of Denial: Strategic resistance to military innovation. Naval War College Review, 69(1), 109–132.
- Jensen, B. M. (2018). The role of ideas in defense planning: revisiting the revolution in military affairs. Defence Studies, 18(3), 302–317. DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2018.1497928
- Jonter, T. (2001). Försvarets forskningsanstalt och planerna på svenska kärnvapen. Stockholm, Sweden: Statens kärnkraftinspektion [Swedish Radiation Safety Authority].
- Jung, H. (1947). Vårt framtida försvar: Överbefälhavarens förslag. Stockholm, Sweden: P. A. Norstedt & Söners Publ./Stockholm in cooperation with Centralkommittén Folk och Försvar.
- Karresand, M., Persson, M., & Lindahl, D. (2004). Scenarion och trender inom framtida informationskrigföring ur ett tekniskt perspektiv. Linköping, Sweden: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut - FOI [the Swedish Defence Research Agency].
- Kastenberg, J. (2009). Non-Intervention and Neutrality in Cyberspace: An Emerging Principle in the National Practice of International Law. The Air Force Law Review, 64.
- Kellstedt, P. M., & Whitten, G. D. (2013). Fundamentals of Political Science Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139104258
- Kier, E. (2017). Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400887477
- Kott, A., & Perconti, P. (2018). Long-term forecasts of military technologies for a 20–30 year horizon: an empirical assessment of accuracy. Technology Forecasting Social Change, 137, 272–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.001
- Lee, C. (2019). The role of culture in military innovation studies: Lessons learned from the US Air Force’s adoption of the Predator Drone, 1993–1997. Journal of Strategic Studies. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2019.1668272
- Lidén, M., Gräns, M., & Juslin, P. (2018). The Presumption of Guilt in Suspect Interrogations: Apprehension as a Trigger of Confirmation Bias and Debasing Techniques. Law and Human Behaviour, 42(4), 336–354. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000287
- Luiijf, E., de Graaf, P., & Besseling, K. (2013). Nineteen National Cyber Security Strategies. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 9(1–2), 3–31. DOI: 10.1504/IJCIS.2013.051608
- McGraw, G. (2013). Cyber War is Inevitable (Unless We Build Security In). Journal of Strategic Studies, 36(1), 109–119. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2012.742013
- Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor No More: A 15–Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), 876–910. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309356804
- Munoz-Rubke, F., Olson, D., Will, R., & James, K. H. (2018). Functional fixedness in tool use: Learning modality, limitations and individual differences. Acta Psychologica, 190, 11–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.006
- Nickerson, R. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
- Nye, J. S. (2017). Deterrence and Dissuasion in Cyberspace. International Security, 41(3), 44–71. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00266
- Posen, B. R. (1984). The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
- Rook, L. (2013). Mental models: a robust definition. The Learning Organization, 20(1), 38–47. DOI: 10.1108/09696471311288519
- Rosen, S. P. (1991). Winning the next war: innovation and the modern military. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
- Silfverskiöld, S., Andersson, K., & Lundmark, M. (2021). Does the method for Military Utility Assessment of Future Technologies provide utility? Technology in Society, 67. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101736
- Svensson, E., Magnusson, J., & Zouave, E. (2019). Kryptomaskar och deras konsekvenser (FOI-R—4774—SE). FOI, Försvarsanalys.
- Swedish Armed Forces. (1954). Alltjämt ett starkt försvar: riktlinjer och kostnader (Kontakt med krigsmakten, Year X(9–1)). Sweden: Försvarsstaben [the defence staff of SwAF].
- Swedish Armed Forces. (1957).
ÖB-utredningarna 1957 (Kontakt med krigsmakten, Year XIII(10– 12)) . Sweden: Försvarsstaben [the defence staff of SwAF]. - Swedish Armed Forces. (1962). ÖB 62: riktlinjer för krigsmaktens fortsatta utveckling. Stockholm, Sweden: Försvarsstaben [the defence staff of SwAF].
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2001). Försvarsmaktsidé och målbild; Årsrapport från Perspektivplaneringen 2000–01. Stockholm, Sweden: Försvarsmakten [Swedish Armed Forces].
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2013). Försvarsmaktens redovisning av perspektivstudien 2013. Stockholm, Sweden: Försvarsmakten (Swedish Armed Forces).
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2016). Militärstrategisk doktrin - MSD 16. Stockholm, Sweden: Försvarsmakten [Swedish Armed Forces].
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2018). Tillväxt för ett starkare försvar. Stockholm, Sweden: Försvarsmakten [Swedish Armed Forces].
- Swedish Armed Forces. (2019). Försvarsmaktens underlag för försvarspolitisk proposition 2021–2025. Stockholm, Sweden: Försvarsmakten [Swedish Armed Forces].
- Swedish Armed Forces and MSB. (2016). Sverige kommer att möta utmaningarna. Stockholm. Sweden: Försvarsmakten och Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap [Swedish Armed Forces and the Swedish Civil contingencies Agency].
- Toader, A., Cantner, U., & Kessler, T. (2019). The Effect of Team Mental Models Divergence on Creative Performance During Situational Changes. Creativity Research Journal, 31(1), 40–51. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2019.1577206
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Weller, J., Ceschi, A., Costantini, A., Sartori, R., & Di Fabio, A. (2019). Dimensions of decision-making: An evidence-based classification of heuristics and biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 188–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.033
- Yang, Y., Narayanan, V., Baburaj, Y., & Swaminathan, S. (2015). Team mental model characteristics and performance in a simulation experiment. Management Research Review, 39(8), 899–924. DOI: 10.1108/MRR-02-2015-0036
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.117 | Journal eISSN: 2596-3856
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 62
Submitted on: Sep 27, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 31, 2022
Published on: Apr 14, 2022
Published by: Scandinavian Military Studies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
© 2022 Ola Modig, Kent Andersson, published by Scandinavian Military Studies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.