Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Preferences of Ukrainian Agribusinesses Toward Sustainability Reporting for Financing of Green Recovery Cover

Preferences of Ukrainian Agribusinesses Toward Sustainability Reporting for Financing of Green Recovery

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Alemu, M.H., Mørkbak, M.R., Olsen, S.B., & Jensen, C.L. (2013). Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 54(3), 333–359. https://doi.org/10/mp4
  2. Astarta Holding PLC. (2024). Sustainability Report 2023. https://astartaholding.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/astarta_ar2023-2.pdf
  3. Barthold, D., Brah, A.T., Graham, S.M., Simoni, J.M., & Hauber, B. (2022). Improvements to Survey Design from Pilot Testing a Discrete-Choice Experiment of the Preferences of Persons Living with HIV for Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapies. The Patient, 15, 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-022-00581-z
  4. Campoamor, N.B., Guerrini, C.J.,·Brooks, W.B.,·Bridges, J.F.P., & Crossnohere, N.L. (2024). Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers. The Patient –Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 17, 109–120 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z
  5. Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., & Nyborg, K. (2017). Social Norms, Morals and Self-Interest as Determinants of Pro--environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66, 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9964-3
  6. De Brún, A., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C.I., Rodgers, H., Ford, G.A., Rudd, M., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., Teah, J.,& Thomso, R.G. (2018). A Novel Design Process for Selection of Attributes for Inclusion in Discrete Choice Experiments: Case Study Exploring Variation in Clinical Decision-Making About Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Ischaemic Stroke. BMC Health Services Research, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3305-5
  7. Deconinck, K., Jansen, M., & Barisone, C. (2023). Fast and Furious: The Rise of Environmental Impact Reporting in Food Systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 50(4), 1310–1337. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad018
  8. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464
  9. Espinosa-Goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & Ruto, E. (2010). What Do Farmers Want From Agri-Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x
  10. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (n.d.). Ukraine Nuclear Safety Upgrade and Green Investments. EBRD. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/sectors/ukraine-nuclear-safety-upgrade--green-investments.html
  11. European Commission. (n.d.-a). The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
  12. European Commission. (n.d.-b). The Ukraine Facility. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-solidarity-ukraine/eu-assistance-ukraine/ukraine-facility_en
  13. European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj
  14. European Commission. (2025). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
  15. European Council. (2022). European Council Conclusions, 23-24 June 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/24/european-council-conclusions-23-24-june-2022
  16. Gagalyuk, T., Chatalova, L., Kalyuzhnyy, O., & Ostapchuk, I. (2021). Broadening the Scope of Instrumental Motivations for CSR Disclosure: An Illustration for Agroholdings in Transition Economies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 24(4), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0210
  17. Gagalyuk, T., Ostapchuk, I., Lapa, V., & Balmann, A. (2022). Why Did Ukraine Become a Key Player on the World Agri-Food Markets? An Enterprise-Level Perspective. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(3), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.343317
  18. Gailhard, İ.U., Bojnec Š. (2015). Farm Size and Participation in Agri-Environmental Measures: Farm-Level Evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy, 46, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.002
  19. Gębska, M., Grontkowska, A., Świderek, W., & Gołębiewska, B. (2020). Farmer Awareness and Implementation of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Different Types of Farms in Poland. Sustainability, 12(19), 8022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198022
  20. German Economic Team. (2022). How to Implement a Green Reconstruction for Ukraine. Newsletter,166. Berlin Economics. https://www.german-economic-team.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/GET_UKR_NL_166_2022_en.pdf
  21. Helling, A.P., Conner, D.S., Heiss, S.N., & Berlin, L.S. (2015). Agriculture, 5(3), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5030879
  22. Hervé, J.-J. (2024). European and Ukrainian Agriculture Are Mutually Complementary. Schuman Paper No. 755. Fondation Robert Schuman. https://server.www.robert-schuman.eu/storage/en/doc/questions-d-europe/qe-755-en.pdf
  23. Hess, S., & Palma, D. (2019). Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application. Journal of Choice Modelling, 32, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170
  24. Hess, S., & Palma, D. (2019). Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application. Journal of Choice Modelling, 32, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170
  25. Kernel Holding S.A. (n.d.) Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 30 June 2023. https://www.kernel.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/FY2023_Kernel_Annual_Report.pdf
  26. Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Henry, N.W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Houghton Mifflin.
  27. Mamine, F., Fares, M., & Minviel, J.J. (2020). Contract Design for Adoption of Agrienvironmental Practices: A Meta-analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments. Ecological Economics, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106721
  28. Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T, Glenk, K., Jacobsen J.B., Liebe, U., Olsen, S.B., Sagebiel, J., & Thiene, M. (2021). Econometric Modelling: Basics. In: P. Mariel, D. Hoyos, J. Meyerhoff, M. Czajkowski, T. Dekker, K. Glenk, J.B. Jacobsen, U. Liebe, S.B. Olsen, J. Sagebiel, M. Thiene, Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments (pp. 61–81). Springer Briefs in Economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3_5
  29. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.
  30. Neyter, R., Dushko, D., Nivievskyi, O., & Stolnykovych, H. (2022). Agricultural War Losses Review Ukraine. Rapid Loss Assessment. Kyiv School of Economics. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Losses_report_issue1.pdf
  31. Nordic Environment Finance Corporation. (n.d.). Green Recovery for Ukraine. NEFCO. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://www.nefco.int/financing/municipalities-in-eastern-europe/green-recovery-ukraine
  32. Qi, D. (2002). Ngene: An Integrated Bioinformatics Platform for Analysis Application Sequence. Biotech Software & Internet Report, 3(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/152791602317250360
  33. Riabchyn, O., & Kulaga, D. (2023). Green Recovery of Ukraine: Guidelines and Instruments for Decision-Makers. Kyiv School of Economics. https://www.undp.org/uk/ukraine/publications/zelene-vidnovlennya-ukrayiny-kerivnipryntsypy-ta-instrumenty-dlya-tykh-khto-ukhvalyuye-rishennya
  34. Schaafsma, M., Ferrini, S., & Turner, R.K. (2019). Assessing Smallholder Preferences for Incentivised Climate-Smart Agriculture Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Land Use Policy, 88, 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104153
  35. Späti, K., Huber, R., Logar, I., & Finger, R. (2022). Incentivizing the Adoption of Precision Agricultural Technologies in Small-Scaled Farming Systems: A Choice Experiment Approach. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 1(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.22
  36. Szinay, D., Cameron, R., Naughton, F., Whitty, J.A., Brown, J., Jones, A. (2021). Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.2196/32365
  37. Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271
  38. Unay Gailhard, İ., Bavorová, M., & Pirscher, F. (2014). Adoption of Agri-Environmental Measures by Organic Farmers: The Role of Interpersonal Communication. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.913985
  39. Unay-Gailhard, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2015). Farm Size and Participation in Agri-Environmental Measures: Farm-Level Evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy, 46, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.002
  40. Unay-Gailhard, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2016). Sustainable Participation Behaviour in Agri-Environmental Measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.003
  41. Unay-Gailhard, I., & Bojnec, Š. (2019). The Impact of Green Economy Measures on Rural Employment: Green Jobs in Farms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.160
  42. United Nations Development Programme. (2024, January 25). Global Environment Facility, UNDP Provide Aid to Polissia Nature Reserve Fund. UNDP Ukraine. https://www.undp.org/ukraine/press-releases/global-environment--facility-undp-provide-aid-polissia-nature-reserve-fund
  43. Wąs, A., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Zavalloni, M., Viaggi, D., Kobus, P., & Sulewski, P. (2021). In Search of Factors Determining the Participation of Farmers in Agri-Environmental Schemes – Does Only Money Matter in Poland? Land Use Policy, 101, 105190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105190
  44. Weller, B.E., Bowen, N.K., & Faubert, S.J. (2020). Latent Class Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932
  45. Zawojska, E., Bartczak, A., & Czajkowski, M. (2018). Disentangling the Effects of Policy and Payment Consequentiality and Risk Attitudes on Stated Preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.007
  46. Zhu, Y., & Chen, J. (2022). Small-Scale Farmers’ Preference Heterogeneity for Green Agriculture Policy Incentives Identified by Choice Experiment. Sustainability, 14(10), 5770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105770
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/199951 | Journal eISSN: 2392-3458 | Journal ISSN: 0044-1600
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 28
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jan 9, 2025
|
Published on: Mar 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Volodymyr Metelytsia, Uliana Gottlieb, Stephan Brosig, Taras Gagalyuk, published by The Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics – National Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.