Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Environmental, Organizational, and Economic Implications for Agriculture in Areas with Different Share of the Natura 2000 Network Cover

Environmental, Organizational, and Economic Implications for Agriculture in Areas with Different Share of the Natura 2000 Network

Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. Alexander, P., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Dislich, C., Dodson, J. R., Engström, K., & Moran, D. (2015). Drivers for Global Agricultural Land Use Change: The Nexus of Diet, Population, Yield and Bioenergy. Global Environmental Change, 35, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.011
  2. Andersen, E., Baldock, D., Bennett, H., Beaufoy, G., Bignal, E., Brouwer, F., Elbersen, B., Eiden, G., Godeschalk, F., Jones, G., McCracken, D., Nieuwenhuizen, W., van Eupen, M., Hennekens, S., & Zervas, G. (2004). Developing a High Nature Value Farming Area Indicator. Final Report. Internal Report for the European Environment Agency. IEEP, 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40802398_Developing_a_high_nature_value_farming_area_indicator_Final_report
  3. Aue, B.T., Diekötter, T.K., Gottschalk, V., & Hotes, S. (2014). How High Nature Value (HNV) Farmland is Related to Bird Diversity in Agro-Ecosystems – Towards a Versatile Tool for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation Planning. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 194, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.012
  4. Buckwell, A., & Armstrong-Brown, S. (2004). Changes in Farming and Future Prospects – Technology and Policy. Ibis, 146(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00351.x
  5. Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A., Baillie, J.E.M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., Carpenter, K.E., Carr, G.M., Chanson, J., Chenery, A.M., Csirke, J., Davidson, N.C., Dentener, F., Foster, M., Galli, A., … Watson, R. (2010). Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512
  6. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R.K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
  7. Early, R., Bradley, B.A., Dukes, J.S., Lawler, J.J., Olden, J.D., Blumenthal, D.M., Gonzalez, P., Grosholz, E.D., Ibañez, I., Miller, L.P., Sorte, C.J.B., & Tatem, A.J. (2016). Global Threats from Invasive Alien Species in the Twenty-First Century and National Response Capacities. Nature Communications, 7, 12485. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485
  8. European Commission [EC]. (2013). The Economic Benefits of Natura 2000 Network. EC, Luxembourg. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/Economic%20Benefits%20Factsheet.pdf
  9. European Commission [EC]. (2015). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council. The Mid--Term Review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. COM(2015) 478 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0478
  10. European Commission [EC]. (2016). Practices to Identify, Monitor and Assess HNV Farming in RDPs 2014–2020. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/evaluation/publications/practices-identify-monitor-and-assess-hnv-farming-rdps-2014-2020_en
  11. European Commission [EC]. (2018). Farming for Natura 2000. Guidance on How to Support Natura 2000 Farming Systems to Achieve Conservation Objectives, Based on Member States Good Practice Experiences. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/management/docs/FARMING%20FOR%20NATURA%202000-final%20guidance.pdf
  12. European Commission [EC]. (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN
  13. European Commission [EC]. (2020a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU Bio-diversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing Nature Back into our Lives. COM(2020) 380 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380
  14. European Commission [EC]. (2020b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. COM(2020) 381 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0381
  15. European Commission [EC]. (2020c). Natura 2000. The New European Green Deal. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 47. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/ENG%20Nat2k47%20WEB.pdf
  16. European Commission [EC]. (2021a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Forging a climate – resilient Europe_the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, COM(2021) 82 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:82:FIN
  17. European Commission [EC]. (2021b). Accounting for Ecosystems and their Services in the European Union (INCA). Final Report from Phase II of the INCA Project Aiming to Develop a Pilot for an Integrated System of Ecosystem Accounts for the EU: 2021 Edition. https://doi.org/10.2785/197909
  18. European Commission [EC]. (2021c). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Fit to 55: Delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality. COM(2021) 550 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0550
  19. European Commission [EC]. (2021d). New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. COM (2021) 572 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A572%3AFIN
  20. European Commission [EC]. (2021e). Natura 2000. “Branding” Natura 2000 Goods and Services. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 50. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d31b281c-fa4d-11eb-b520-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-223687552
  21. European Commission [EC]. (2021f). Natura 2000. “Branding” Natura 2000 Goods and Services. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 50. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d31b281c-fa4d-11eb-b520-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-223687552
  22. European Environmental Agency [EEA]. (2015). The European Environment State and Outlook 2015. https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2015
  23. European Environmental Agency [EEA]. (2018). The Natura 2000 Barometer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/natura-2000-barometer
  24. European Environmental Agency [EEA]. (2019). The European Environment State and Outlook 2020. Knowledge for Transition to a Sustainable Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2020
  25. European Envionmental Agency [EEA]. (2020). State of Nature in the EU. Results from Reporting under the Nature Directives 2013–2018, EEA Report, 10. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu-2020
  26. European Union [EU] (2012). Consolidated Version of The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C326/47. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT
  27. Eurostat. (2022, February, 3). Statistics Explained. Agri-environmental indicator – High Nature Value farmland. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agri-environmental_indicator_-_High_Nature_Value_farmland
  28. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. (2017). Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management for the Achievement of a Zero Hunger World. https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/resources/events/detail/en/c/1042165/
  29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. (2021). World Food Statistical and Agriculture Yearbook 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/fao-statistical-yearbook-2021-world-food-and-agriculture
  30. Gamero, A., Brotons, L., Brunner, A., Foppen, R. P. B., Fornasari, L., Gregory, R. D., Herrando, S., Horak, D., Jiguet, F., Kmecl, P., Lehikoinen, A., Lindstrom, Å., Paquet, J. Y., Reif, J., Sirkia, P., Skorpilova, J., van Strien A. J., Szep, T., Telenský, T., ..., Vorísek, P. (2017). Tracking Progress Toward EU Biodiversity Strategy Targets: EU Policy Effects in Preserving its Common Farmland Birds. Conservation Letters, 10(4), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12292
  31. Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska [GDOŚ]. (2017). Realizacja Dyrektywy ptasiej i Dyrektywy siedliskowej. https://www.senat.gov.pl/gfx/senat/userfiles/_public/k9/komisje/2016/ks/materialy/mat_1_73.pdf
  32. Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska [GIOŚ]. (2018a). Stan środowiska w Polsce. Raport 2018. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska. https://www.gios.gov.pl/pl/aktualnosci/521-stan-srodowiska-w-polsce-raport-2018
  33. Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska [GIOŚ]. (2018b). Trendy liczebności ptaków w Polsce. https://otop.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Trendy_liczebnosci_ptakow_w_Polsce_2018.pdf
  34. Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska [GIOŚ]. (2022, February, 2). Państwowy Monitoring Środowiska. Monitoring Ptaków Polski. Wskaźnik liczebności pospolitych ptaków krajobrazu rolniczego – Rok 2021. https://monitoringptakow.gios.gov.pl/ptaki-krajobrazu-rolniczego.html
  35. Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2013). Powszechny Spis Rolny 2010. Rolnictwo na obszarach specyficznych. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/psr-2010/powszechny-spis-rolny-2010-rolnictwo-na--obszarach-specyficznych,13,1.html
  36. Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2021a). Powszechny Spis Rolny. 2020. Raport z wyników. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/psr-2020/powszechny-spis-rolny-2020-raport-z-wynikow,4,1.html
  37. Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2021b). Ochrona środowiska. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko--energia/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska-2021,1,22.html
  38. Henle, K., Alard, D., Clitherow, J., Cobb, P., Firbank, L., Kull, T., McCracken, D., Moritz, R.F.A., Niemela, J., Rebane, M., Wascher, D., Watt, A., & Young, J. (2008). Identifying and Managing the Conflicts Between Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation in Europe – A Review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 124(1–2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005
  39. IPBES. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E.S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, & H.T. Ngo (Eds.). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
  40. Jadczyszyn, J., & Zieliński, M. (2020). Assessment of Farms from High Nature Value Farmland Areas in Poland. Annals PAAAE, XXII(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.4013
  41. Laktić, T., & Malovrh, S.P. (2018). Stakeholder Participation in Natura 2000 Management Program: Case Study of Slovenia. Forests, 9(10), 599, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100599
  42. Liu, J., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., & Luck, G.W. (2003). Effects of Household Dynamics on Resource Consumption and Biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01359
  43. Lomba, A., Guerra, C., Alonso, J., Honrado, J.P., Jongman, R., & McCracken, D. (2014). Mapping and Monitoring High Nature Value Farmlands: Challenges in European Landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 143, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.029
  44. Łopatka, A., Koza, P., & Siebielec, G. (2017). Propozycja metodyki wydzieleń zasięgów obszarów ONW typ specyficzny wg tzw. kryteriów krajowych. Ekspertyza dla MRiRW.
  45. Magurran, A.E. (1996). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
  46. Matyka, M. (2017). Ocena regionalnego zróżnicowania struktury zasiewów w kontekście oddziaływania na środowisko przyrodnicze. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, XIX, 3, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.3245
  47. Müller, A., Schneider, U.A., & Jantke, K. (2018). Is large Good Enough? Evaluating and Improving Representation of Ecoregions and Habitat Types in the European Union’s Protected Area Network Natura 2000. Biological Conservation, 227, 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.024
  48. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Biodiversity: Finance and the Economic and Business Case of Action. [Report]. French G&Presidency and the G7 Environments Ministers’ Meeting, Metz, 5–6 May 2019. https://www.oecd.org/env/resources/biodiversity/biodiversity-finance-and-the-economic-and-business-case-for-action.html
  49. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). Cities in the World. A New Perspective on Urbanization. OECD Urban Studies. https://www.oecd.org/publications/cities-in-the-world-d0efcbda-en.htm
  50. Potts, S.G., Roberts, S.P.M., Dean, R., Marris, G., Brown, M.A., Jones, R., Neumann, P., & Settele, J. (2010). Declines of Managed Honey Bees and Beekeepers in Europe. Journal of Apicultural Research, 49(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.02
  51. Prandecki, K., Wrzaszcz, W., & Zieliński, M. (2021). Environmental and Climate Challenges to Agriculture in Poland in the Context of Objectives Adopted in the European Green Deal Strategy. Sustainability, 13(18), 10318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810318
  52. Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D.M. (2010). Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548
  53. Schowalter, T.D., Noriega, J.A., & Tscharntke, T. (2018). Insect Effects on Ecosystem Services-Introduction. Basic and Applied Ecology, 26, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.011
  54. Sienkiewicz, J. (2010). Koncepcje bioróżnorodności – ich wymiary i miary w świetle literatury. Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych, 45, 7–29. https://docplayer.pl/24746150-Jadwiga-sienkiewicz-koncepcje-bioroznorodnosci--ich-wymiary-i-miary-w-swietle-literatury.html
  55. Stoate, C., Baldi, A., Beja, P., Boatman, N.D., Herzon, I., van Doorn, A., de Snoo, G.R., Rakosy, L., & Ramwell, C. (2009). Ecological Impacts of Early 21st Century Agricultural Change in Europe – A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005
  56. Tsiafouli, M.A., Thebault, E., Sgardelis, S.P., de Ruiter, P.C., van der Putten, W.H., Birkhofer, K., Hemerik, L., de Vries, F.T., Bardgett, R.D., Brady, M.V., Bjornlund, L., Jørgensen, H.B., Christensen, S., Hertefeldt, T.D’., Hotes, S., Gera Hol, W.H., Frouz, J., Liiri, M., Mortimer, S.R., ..., Hedlund, K. (2015). Intensive Agriculture Reduces Soil Biodiversity Across Europe. Global Change Biology, 21(2), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12752
  57. United Nations [UN]. (2010). Provisional Technical Rationale, Possible Indicators and Suggested Milestones for the Aichi Biodiversity Target (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/27/Add.1 19 December 2010, Nagoya 18–29 October, Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020; An Information Document (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/inf/12/rev.1).3. https://www.cbd.int/kb/record/decision/12268
  58. United Nations [UN]. (2014). Resourcing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: An Assessment of Benefits, Investments and Resource needs for Implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. Second Report of the High-Level Panel on Global Assessment of Resources for Implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020. https://www.cbd.int/financial/hlp/doc/hlp-02-report-en.pdf
  59. United Nations [UN]. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/en/home/library/sustainable-development-report/the-2030-agenda-for--sustainable-development.html?utm_source=EN&utm_medium=GSR&utm_content=US_UNDP_PaidSearch_Brand_English&utm_campaign=CENTRAL&c_src=CENTRAL&c_src2=GSR&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgOWnwrHQ9gIViQWiAx08fw4wEAAYASAAEgJmj_D_BwE
  60. United Nations [UN]. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. ST/ESA/SER.A/42.3. Highlights. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf
  61. United Nations [UN]. (2021a). Food Waste Index Report 2021. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste--index-report-2021
  62. United Nations [UN]. (2021b). Kunming Declaration “Ecological Civilization: Building a Shared Future for All Life on Earth”, CBD/COP/15/5Add.1. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/c2db/972a/fb32e0a277bf1ccfff742be5/cop-15-05-add1-en.pdf
  63. Van Dyck, H., Van Strien, A.J., Maes, D., & Van Swaay, C.A.M. (2009). Declines in Common, Widespread Butterflies in a Landscape Under Intense Human Use. Conservation Biology, 23(4), 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01175.x
  64. Vickery, J.A., Feber, R.E., & Fuller, R.J. (2009). Arable Field Margins Managed for Biodiversity Conservation: A Review of Food Resource Provision for Farmland Birds. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(1–2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012
  65. Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Transformative Change through Sustainable Development Goals. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4191
  66. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Nature and Business. New Nature Economy Report II. https://www.weforum.org/reports/new-nature-economy-report-ii-the-future-of-nature-and-business
  67. World Economic Forum. (2021). The Global Risks Report 2020. 15th Edition. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
  68. Wrzaszcz, W., & Zieliński, M. (2022). Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Poland – Towards Organization and Biodiversity Improvement? European Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2022.v11n1p87
  69. Zieliński, M., Łopatka, A., & Koza, P. (2020). Assessment of the Functioning of Farms in Less-Favored Areas and in Areas of Significant Natual Value (LFA Specific type Zone I). Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, 363(3), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/124638
  70. Zieliński, M. (Ed.). (2019). Przedsiębiorstwo i gospodarstwo rolne wobec zmian klimatu (5). Monografie Programu Wieloletniego, 97. IERiGŻ PIB. http://www.ierigz.waw.pl/download/23701-pw-97.pdf
  71. Zisenis, M. (2017). Is the Natura 2000 Network of the European Union the Key Land Use Policy Tool for Preserving Europe’s Biodiversity Heritage? Land Use Policy, 69, 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.045
  72. Zomeni, M., Martinou, A.F., Stavrinides, M.C., & Vogiatzakis, I.N. (2018). High Nature Value Farmlands: Challenges in Identification and Interpretation Using Cyprus as a Case Study. Nature Conservation, 31, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.31.28397
  73. Zoppi, C. (2018). Integration of Conservation Measures Concerning Natura 2000 Sites into Marine Protected Areas Regulations. A study Related to Sardinia. Sustainability, 10(10), 3460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103460
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/147883 | Journal eISSN: 2392-3458 | Journal ISSN: 0044-1600
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 78
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2022
|
Accepted on: Mar 31, 2022
|
Published on: Jan 24, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Marek Zieliński, published by The Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics – National Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.