References
- Adams-Prassl, J., Binns, R., and Kelly-Lyth, A., 2023. Directly discriminatory algorithms. Modern Law Review, 86, 144–175
- AI Act, 2021. Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Articial Intelligence (AI Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts
- Ainaz, J., Kim, D., Arif, M., 2025. A Survey of Predictive Maintenance Methods: An Analysis of Prognostics via Classification and Regression. DO - 10.48550/arXiv.2506.20090
- Andriescu, M., Battaglini, M., Spyridopoulos, K., Kilic, L., Olausson, N., Broughton, A., Toro, D., 2024. Inteligentne cyfrowe systemy monitorowania bezpieczeństwa i higieny pracy: zastosowania i wyzwania Streszczenie. Europejska Agencja Bezpieczeństwa i Zdrowia w Pracy
- Battal, S., 2025. Impact of artificial intelligence usage on occupational stress: an exploratory study of risk factors and prevention strategies. AI & Soc, DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02385-9
- Bąba, M., 2020. Algorytmy–nowy wymiar nadzoru i kontroli nad świadczącym pracę, Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne, 3
- Baeza-Yates, R., 2018. Bias on the web. Communications of the ACM, 61(6), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209581
- Bérastégui, P., 2024. Artificial intelligence in Industry 4.0: implications for occupational safety and health Report, No. 2024.01, ISBN 978-2-87452-714-2, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), Brussels
- Boschetti, G., Faccio, M., Granata, I., 2023. Human-Centered Design for Productivity and Safety in Collaborative Robots Cells: A New Methodological Approach. Electronics, 12(1), 167. DOI: 10.3390/ELECTRONICS12010167
- Brożek, B., Furman, M., Jakubiec, M., 2024. The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making. Artif Intell Law 32, 427–440, DOI: 10.1007/s10506-023-09356-9)
- Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., and Wincent, J., 2021. AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial eco-systems: A framework, model and outline for further research. Journal of Business Research, 127, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.
- Chen, Z.S. 2023. Ethics and Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Recruitment Practices. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 10 (2023), 567. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x
- Chojnowski, M., 2022. Etyka sztucznej inteligencji. Wprowadzenie, Warszawa
- Coeckelbergh, M., 2020. AI Ethics, Cambridge and London.
- Cohen, Y., Shoval, S., Faccio, M., Minto, R., 2022. Deploying Cobots in Collaborative Systems: Major Considerations and Productivity Analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 60(6), 1815–1831. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1870758
- Colgate, E., J., Wannasuphoprasit, W., Peshkin, M., 1999. Cobots: Robots For Collaboration With Human Operators, Department of Mechanical Engineering Northwestern University Evanston
- Craddock, T., 2025. AI Is Making Us Worse Programmers (Here’s How to Fight Back). Medium
- Danks, D., and London, A. J., 2017. Algorithmic bias in autonomous systems. In F. Bacchus & C. Sierra (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, 4691–4697. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization
- Deloitte, 2024. State of Generative AI in the Enterprise 2024, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/consulting/articles/state-ofgenerative-ai-in-enterprise.html, (accessed on September 19, 2025)
- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2017. Monitoring technology: The 21st century’s pursuit of well-being?, https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Workers_monitoring_and_well-being.pdf (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2019, OSH and the future of work: benefits and risks of artificial intelligence tools in workplaces, https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/202111/OSH_future_of_workartificial_intelligence.pdf, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2021. Impact of artificial intelligence on occupational safety and health, https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Policy-brief-Impact-AI-OSH_EN.pdf, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2025a. Musculoskeletal health and risk factors in the health and social care sector – a review of existing information Report, https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/musculoskeletal-health-risk-factors-hescare-sector_886_EN.pdf, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2025b. Strategies and legislation on psychosocial risks in six european countries, https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/strategies-legislation-psychosocial-risks-european-countries_policy-brief_EN.pdf, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- European Commission, 2021. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artifcial Intelligence (Artifcial Intelligence Act)
- European Commission, 2023. European Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade 2023/C 23/01
- European Funds, 2023. Zrównoważony rozwój firmy produkcyjnej i ochrona środowiska – ESG producenta a sztuczna inteligencja (AI 4FACTORY). Strategia ESG producenta a sztuczna inteligencja (AI) - DSR, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- Faccio, M., Granata, I., Menini, A., Milanese, M., Rossato, C., Bottin, M., Minto, R., Pluchino, P., Gamberini, L., Boschetti, G., Rosati, G., 2022. Human Factors in Cobot Era: A Review of Modern Production Systems Features. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–22. DOI: 10.1007/S10845-022-01953-W
- Fobel, P. (2021). Application of Ethical Standards a nd Ethical Risks Industry 4.0. Etyka Biznesu i Zrównoważony Rozwój. Business Ethics and Sustainable Development, 1, 20-29
- Fragapane, G., Ivanov, D., Peron, M., Sgarbossa, F., Strandhagen, J.O., 2022. Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous. mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Annals of Operations, 308, 125-143. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03526-7
- Grau, A., Machado, J., Bolea, Y., Nabissi, G., Longhi, S., Bonci, A., 2023. ROS-Based Condition Monitoring Architecture Enabling Automatic Faults Detection in Industrial Collaborative Robots. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 143. DOI: 10.3390/APP13010143
- Grossman, G., 2023. AI assistants boost productivity but paradoxically risk human deskilling. VentureBeat
- Hawkins, T., 2023. Psychological Factors Impacting Adoption of Decision Support Tools. In: Mukherjee, S., Dutt, V., Srinivasan, N. (eds) Applied Cognitive Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-3966-4_4
- He, H., Gray, J., Cangelosi, A., Meng, Q., T., McGinnity, A., Mehnen, J., 2022. The Challenges and Opportunities of Human-Centered AI for Trustworthy Robots and Autonomous Systems, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol.14, no.4, 1398-1412, 2022
- Heyder, T., Passlack, N. and Posegga, O., 2023. Ethical Management of Human-AI Interaction: Theory Development Review. Journal Of Strategic Information Systems 32 (2023): 101772. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101772
- IEC/ISA 62443, 2007, https://www.isa.org/standards-and-publications/isa-standards/isa-iec-62443-series-of-standards
- IDEAS NCBR, 2023. Bardziej wydajny niż ChatGPT? Polscy naukowcy opracowali model językowy o nieznanych dotąd możliwościach, https://ideas-ncbr.pl/bardziej-wydajny-niz-chatgpt-polscy-naukowcylongllama-model-jezykowy/. (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- Ingaldi, M., Ulewicz, R., 2025. Sustainable development and technological advancements in industry 4.0: overcoming barriers in SME sector inte gration. Management systems in production engineering, 33(2), 144-162. DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2025-0015
- ISO 10218-1., 2025, www.iso.org/standard/73933.html, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- ISO/TS 15066, 2016, www.iso.org/standard/62996.html, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- ISO/IEC 42001, 2023, www.iso.org/standard/42001, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- ISO 13849, 2015, www.iso.org/standard/13849, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- ISO 12100, 2010, www.iso.org/standard/12100, (accessed on September 25, 2025)
- Jakubiak, M., and Stacewicz. P., 2023. Zaufanie Do Systemów Sztucznej Inteligencji. Wydanie I, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej. https://biblioteka.awl.edu.pl/sowacgi.php?KatID=0&typ=record&001=WROC%20WSO21000999
- Kamiński R. 2022. Rozwój zrównoważony. Założenia koncepcyjne, działania systemowe i implementacja idei na poziomie przedsiębiorstwa, In: Wpływ otoczenia międzynarodowego na funkcjonowanie przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. A. Baszyński, R. Kamiński (eds). Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne w Poznaniu, Poznań, 49-79
- Kasap, A., 2025. Philosophical grounds for regulating the lawful operation of autonomous vehicles, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology,1
- Kelly-Lyth, A., 2021. Challenging Biased Hiring Algorithms, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies”, Vol. 41, Issue 4.
- Knosala, B., 2023. Zarządzanie środowiskiem naturalnym przez sztuczną inteligencję. Ograniczenia i wyzwania narracji postnatury. Ethos 36(2023) nr 4(144) 127-145, DOI 10.12887/36-2023-4-144-10
- Kosiak, P., 2023. Etyczne Aspekty Rozwoju i Wykorzystania Sztucznej Inteligencji, International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences 5 (21). Special Issue. 341 – 350. DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0054.8421
- Kosicka, E., Mazurkiewicz D., Gola A., 2016. Model adaptacyjnego algorytmu wspomagania decyzji w systemie utrzymania ruchu. Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem, 19(4)
- Kuzior, A., 2020. Polskie i niemieckie doświadczenia w projektowaniu i wdrażaniu zrównoważonego rozwoju, Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, 5(1), 81-89.
- Kuzior, A., Kwilinski, A. and Tkachenko, V., 2019. Sustainable development of organizations based on the combinatorial model of artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 7(2), 1353-1376. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2(39)
- Kuzior, A., Kwilinski, A., 2022. Cognitive Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Social Perception, Management Systems in Production Engi neering, 30(2), 109-115, DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2022-0014
- Kuzior, A., Sira, M. and Brożek, P., 2023. Ethical Implications and Social Impacts of Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Sustainability Efforts. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska 176 (2023): 333-46. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.176.20
- Kwilinski, A. and Kuzior, A., 2020. Cognitive Technologies in the Management and Formation of Directions of The Priority Development of Industrial Enterprises. Management Systems in Production Engineering, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp. 133-138.
- Lackner, T., Hermann, J., Kuhn, C., Palm, D., 2024. Review of autonomous mobile robots in intralogistics: state-of-the-art, limitations and research gaps. Procedia CIRP, 130, 930-935. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.187.
- Lee, S.E., Ju, N. and KH Lee, K.H., 2023, Service Chatbot: Co-Citation and Big Data Analysis toward a Review and Research Agenda. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 194,122722. DOI: 10.1016/j.tech-fore.2023.122722
- Liu, L., Guo, F., Zou, Z., Duffy, V.G., 2024. Application, development and future opportunities of collaborative robots (cobots) in manufacturing: A literature review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(4), 915-932. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2041907.
- Lubasz, D., 2020. Konstruowanie humanocentrycznej SI z wykorzystaniem instrumentów prawnych ochrony danych osobowych. in: Sztuczna inteligencja w kontekście ochrony danych osobowych. UODO 2020
- Łupkowski, P., Jański-Mały, F., 2020. The more you see me the more you like me: Influencing the negative attitudes towards interactions with robots. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics Intelligent Systems, 14(3), DOI: 10.14313/JAMRIS/3-2020/27.
- Manroop, L., Malik, A. and Milner, M., 2024. The Ethical Implications of Big Data in Human Resource Management, Human Resource Management Review 34, no. 2 (2024): 101012. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101012
- Marszałek-Kotzur, I., 2019. Philosophical concept of responsibility - the key feature of the idea of sustainable development. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, Article 135. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2019.135.10
- Marszałek-Kotzur, I., 2022. Cognitive technologies - are we in danger of humanizing machines and dehumanizing humans? Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30, Article 3. DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2022-0034
- Marszałek-Kotzur, I., 2023a. The ethics of artificial intelligence. Can we trust robots? Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, Article 183. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.183.21
- Marszałek-Kotzur, I. 2023b. Raportowanie niefinansowe – raporty ESG. Etyka Biznesu i Zrównoważony Rozwój. Interdyscyplinarne studia teoretyczno-empiryczne, 72–79.
- Marszałek-Kotzur, I., 2024a. The future of man in a world of artificial intelligence. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, Article 210. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2024.210.25
- Marszałek-Kotzur, I., 2024b. Rozwój sztucznej inteligencji a prawa człowieka, w: Globalne konteksty poszanowania praw i wolności człowieka. Praca zbiorowa. 16. A. Kuzior (ed.), Monografia / Politechnika Śląska (No. 1048). Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
- Martini, C., 2019. Blackbox Algorithmus – Grundfragen einer Regulierung künstlicher Intelligenz., Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
- McKinsey & Company, 2017. Harnessing automation for a future that works. McKinsey & Company, New York-USA https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/digital-disruption/harnessing-automation-fora-future-that-works (accessed on September 19, 2025)
- McKinsey & Company, 2023. The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier, McKinsey & Company, New York-USA. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier (accessed on September 19, 2025).
- Miller, T., 2019. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007
- Ministry of Digital Affairs, 2024. Europejski AI Act opublikowany, https://www.gov.pl/web/cyfryzacja/europejski-ai-act-opublikowany, (accessed on September 19, 2025)
- Misztal, A., 2019. Zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstw a stopień rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego, Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, nr 174, 33–45
- Moore, P.V., 2019. OSH and the Future of Work: Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Workplaces, in: Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Body and Motion, 292-315
- Moreira, T.C., 2022. Algorithms, Discrimination and Collective Bargaining. In: Collective Bargaining and the Gig Economy, DOI:10.5040/9781509956227.ch-009
- NIST AI RMF 1.0, 2021, https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework, (accessed on September 19, 2025)
- Nowik, P., 2022. New challenges for trade unions in the face of algorithmic management in the work environment. Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej, 29(2), 121–143.
- Official Journal of the European Union, 2024. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council
- Otto, M., 2022. Dyskryminacja algorytmiczna w zatrudnieniu. Zarys problemu. Studia z zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej, 29(2), 145-160. DOI:10.4467/25444654SPP.22.012.15686
- Ouadah, A., Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L., Salhi, N., 2022. Selecting an appropriate supervised machinelearning algorithm for predictive maintenance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,119
- Paliga, M., 2022. Human–Cobot Interaction Fluency and Cobot Operators’ Job Performance. The Mediating Role of Work Engagement: A Survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 155. DOI: 10.1016/J.ROBOT.2022.104191
- Paliga, M., Pollak, A., 2021. Development and validation of the fluency in human-robot interaction scale. A two-wave study on three perspectives of fluency. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102698. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102698
- Panagou, S., Neumann, W.P., Fruggiero, F., 2024. A scoping review of human robot interaction research towards industry 5.0 human-centric work places. International Journal of Production Research, 62(3), 974–990. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2172473
- Pizoń, J., Gola, A., Rudawska, A., 2023. Coboty jako kluczowy czynnik rozwoju masowej personalizacji w ramach Przemysłu 4.0 i Przemysłu 5.0, Inżynieria zarządzania. Cyfryzacja produkcji. Aktualności badawcze 5, 13-21), Publisher: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
- Prabhakaran, S., Rishaa, P.S., Ashwath, R., Suresh, M., 2024. A review on cobots: A man’s helping hand. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3035, 020027. DOI: /10.1063/5.0194713.
- Prokopowicz, D., (2023). Opportunities and threats to the development of Artificial Intelligence applications and the need for normative regulation of this development, International Journal of Legal Studies, 2 (14), 95-130.
- Prokopowicz, D., 2024. Zagrożenia wynikające z nieetycznego i nieuregulowanego prawnie zastosowania technologii sztucznej inteligencji. In: A. Wysocki (ed.), Sztuczna inteligencja: szanse i zagrożenia. Aspekty spo-łeczne i etyczne. Warszawa
- Rafner, J., Dellermann, D., Hjorth, A., Veraszto, D., Kampf, C., Mackay, W., Sherson, J., 2021. Deskilling, Upskilling, and Reskilling: a Case for Hybrid Intelligence, Morals & Machines 1(2):24-39. DOI:10.5771/2747-5174-2021-2-24
- Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Knop, K., 2024. Navigating the Fourth Industrial Revolution: insights from a comprehensive bibliometric study on Industry 4.0. Production Engineering 10.30657/pea.2024.30.4
- Roth, L., 2023. The nine biggest announcements from GoogleI/O, The Verge Saghiri, A. M., 2020. A Survey on Challenges in Designing Cognitive Engines, 2020 6th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), 165-171
- Sceife, A.D.,2024. Improve predictive maintenance through the application of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Results in Engineering, 21:101645
- Schaich Borg, J., Conitzer, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 2024. Moralna AI : czy bać się sztucznej inteligencji, tłum. B. Beniok, E. Ł. Łokas. Wars-zawa,
- Schmidbauer, C., Komenda, T., Schlund S., 2020. Teaching Cobots in Learning Factories – User and Usability-Driven Implications. Procedia Manu facturing, 45, 398-404, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.043
- Schürmann, S., 2025. The Quiet Crisis: How is AI Eroding Our Technical Competence? DEV Community
- Sidhu, B. K., 2024. Hallucinations in Artificial Intelligence: Origins, Detection, and Mitigation, International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 14, Issue 1, 8-15
- Sira, M. (2021). International Aspects Of Cognitive Technology Development Based On «Sharing». Etyka Biznesu i Zrównoważony Rozwój. Interdyscyplinarne studia teoretyczno empiryczne/Business Ethics and Sustainable Development. Interdisciplinary theoretical and empirical studies, 2, 16-22
- Siuta-Tokarska, B., 2021. Przemysł 4.0 i sztuczna inteligencja: szansa czy zagrożenie dla realizacji koncepcji zrównoważonego i trwałego rozwoju? Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, nr 65 (1/2021) Social Inequalities and Economic Growth, no. 65 (1/2021) DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2021.1.1
- Stahl, B.C., 2021. Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future. An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. Springer Briefs in Research And Innovation Governance, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9
- Stapels, J.G., Eyssel, F., 2021. Let’s not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots. PloS one, 16(1)
- Stefański, K, Żywolewska, K., 2024. Lack of Transparency in Algorithmic Management of Workers and Trade Unions’ Right to Information: European and Polish Perspectives. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 29(2):53-63. DOI:10.15290/bsp.2024.29.02.05
- Tamir, S., 2025. Ethical governance of AI-based humanoid carebots: the case for Ethics of Techno-care, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-025-10305-3
- Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., and Elger, G., 2021. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215:107864
- Von Braun, J., Archer, M.S., Reichberg, G.M. and Sánchez Sorond, M., 2021. AI, Robotics, and Humanity: Opportunities, Risks, and Implications for Ethics and Policy, in: J. von Braun et al. (eds), Robotics, AI, and Humanity, Springer, Cham 2021, p. 1-13.
- Wagner, N., Ingaldi, M., 2025. Two faces of automation: cobots and autonomous mobile robots in action, Production Engineering Archives, 31(3), 276-290
- Webb, A., 2019. The Big Nine. How the Tech Titans & Their Thinking Machines Could Warp Humanity, New York.
- Weng, Y. H. and Francesconi, E., 2023. Ethical Design for Privacy-related Communication in Human-Robot Interaction, 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), Busan, Korea, Republic, 2427-2432, DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN57019.2023.10309553
- Williams, B.A., Brooks, C.F., Shmargad, Y., 2018. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications, Journal of Information Policy, Vol. 8
- Wykowska, A., 2020. Social Robots to Test Flexibility of Human Social Cognition. Int J of Soc Robotics, 12, 1203–1211. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-020-00674-5.
- Żywiołek. J., 2024. Trust-building in ai-human partnerships within Industry 5.0. System Safety: Human - Technical Facility – Environment, 6(1), 89 98. DOI: 10.2478/czoto-2024-0011