Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Multi-criteria decision analysis for simplified evaluation of clean energy technologies Cover

Multi-criteria decision analysis for simplified evaluation of clean energy technologies

By: Aldona Kluczek  
Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. Assefa, G., Frostell, B., 2007. Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies, Technology in Society, 29, 63-78.10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007
  2. Ayan, M.B., 2013. Fuzzy TOPSIS application for supplier selection problem, International Journal of Information. Business and Management, 4(3), 11-23.
  3. Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., 2005a. An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part I: Problem structuring, The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(2), 98-111.10.1080/13504500509469622
  4. Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., 2005b. An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part II: Problem analysis, The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(2), 112-131.10.1080/13504500509469623
  5. Bakouros, Y., 2000. Technology evaluation, , available at: http://www.adi.pt/docs/innoregio_techn_evaluation.pdf, (20.09.2017).
  6. Bertoni, M., Hallstedt, S., Ola, I., 2015. A model-based approach for sustainability and value assessment in the aerospace value chain, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7, 2015, 1-19.10.1177/1687814015590215
  7. Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 17(1), 233-247.10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
  8. Coates, J., 1976. Technology Assessment - A Tool Kit. Chemtech, p. 372.
  9. Chou, S-W., Chang, Y-C., 2008. The implementation factors that influence the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Benefits, Decision Support System, 46(1), 149-157.10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003
  10. Daim, T., Yates, D., Peng, Y., Jimenez, B., 2009. Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific Northwest, Technology in Society, 31, 232-243.10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.009
  11. Davies, M.A.P., 1994. A Multicriteria Decision Model Application for Managing Group Decisions, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(1), 47-58.10.1057/jors.1994.6
  12. Dąbrowski, K, Skrzypek, K., 2016. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to building research teams, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 1(21), 7-11.10.2478/mspe-01-01-2016
  13. Ely A., Zwanenberg, Stirling, A., 2011. Technology Assessment New Models of Technology Assessment for Development, available at: http://www.academia.edu/21400513/Technology_Assessment_New_Models_of_Technology_Assessment_for_Development (10.03.2019).
  14. Evans, A., Strezov V., Evans T.J., 2009. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1082-1088.10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008
  15. Garg, H., 2017. Some Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Multicriteria Decision-Making, Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering, 42, 5275-5290.10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9
  16. Gładysz, B., Kluczek, A., 2017. A framework for strategic assessment of far-reaching technologies: A case study of Combined Heat and Power technology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 242-252.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.175
  17. González, P del Río, 2005. Analysing the factors influencing clean technology adoption: a study of the Spanish pulp and paper industry, Business strategy and the environment, 14(1), 20-37.10.1002/bse.426
  18. Grundwald, A., Rösch, C., 2011. Sustainability assessment of energy technologies: towards an integrative framework, Energy, Sustainability and Society 1, 2011, 3. doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-1-3.10.1186/2192-0567-1-3
  19. Harris, J.M., Wise T., Goodwin N.R., 2001. A survey of sustainable development: social and economic dimensions, frontier issues in economic thought, Island Press,. Washington, DC, 6.
  20. Hrovatin, N., Dolšak, N., Zorić, J., 2016. Factors impacting investments in energy efficiency and clean technologies: empirical evidence from Slovenian manufacturing firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 475-486.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.039
  21. IEA, 2006. Energy Technology Perspectives, OECD/IEA, Paris.
  22. Jang, J.-S.R, 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665 – 685.10.1109/21.256541
  23. Karschin, I., Geldermann, J, 2015. Efficient cogeneration and district heating systems in bioenergy villages: an optimization approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 305-314.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.086
  24. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.10.1017/CBO9781139174084
  25. Klevas, V., Streimikienea D., Kleviene, A., 2009. Sustainability assessment of the energy projects implementation in regional scale, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(1), 155-166.10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.004
  26. Kluczek, A., 2016. Application of multi-criteria approach for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes, Management and Production Engineering Review, 7, 62-78.10.1515/mper-2016-0026
  27. Kluczek, A., Gładysz, B., 2015. Analytical Hierarchy Process/Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution-based approach to the generation of environmental improvement options, Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 360-367.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.079
  28. Kong, L., Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L., 2016. Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and paper industry: A technical review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 5-28.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.116
  29. Liu, P., 2009. Multi-attribute decision making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 15(3), 453-463.10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.453-463
  30. Meixner, O., 2013. Fuzzy AHP Group Decision Analysis and its Application for the Evaluation of Energy Sources, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 896-905.
  31. Oteng-Seifah, S.A.E., Adjei-Kumi T.A., 2007. Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Methodologies. In: Horner, M., Hardcastle, C., Price, A., Bebbington, J. (eds.), International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment Glasgow.
  32. Achs I., 1999. Social sustainability and whole development: exploring the dimensions of sustainable development. In: Egon, B, Thomas, J., (eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: a cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation, Zed Books, London.
  33. Schot, J.W., 1992. Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 36-56.10.1177/016224399201700103
  34. Singh, R.K., Murty H.R., Gupta S.K., Dikshit A.K., 2012. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15, 281–299.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007
  35. Singh, S., Olugu E.U., Fallahpour A., 2014. Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Technology Environment Polic, 16, 847–860.10.1007/s10098-013-0676-5
  36. Varela, L.R., Ribeiro, R.A., 2003. Evaluation of simulated annealing to solve fuzzy optimization problems, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 14(2), 59–72.
  37. Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2019.23.01 | Journal eISSN: 2353-7779 | Journal ISSN: 2353-5156
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 11
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2019
|
Accepted on: May 5, 2019
|
Published on: Jul 27, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Aldona Kluczek, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.