Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cost Effectiveness of Mobile Health for Antenatal Care and Facility Births in Nigeria Cover

Cost Effectiveness of Mobile Health for Antenatal Care and Facility Births in Nigeria

Open Access
|Nov 2018

References

  1. 1WHO. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
  2. 2Larson E, Vail D, Mbaruku GM, Mbatia R and Kruk ME. Beyond utilization: Measuring effective coverage of obstetric care along the quality cascade. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care; 2016.
  3. 3WHO. mHealth New horizons for health through mobile technologies. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
  4. 4van Heerden A, Tomlinson M and Swartz L. Point of care in your pocket: A research agenda for the field of m-health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2012; 90(5): 393394. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.099788
  5. 5Wong J, Dang L, Le T, et al. Strengthening health system – Evidence from the use of bi-directional SMS-based screening and feedback system to improve efficiency and quality of disease surveillance in Vietnam. Annals of Global Health. 2017; 83(1): 121. DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.03.270
  6. 6Colaci D, Chaudhri S and Vasan A. mHealth interventions in low-income countries to address maternal health: A systematic review. Annals of Global Health. 2016; 82(5): 922935. DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.09.001
  7. 7Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R and Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health, Science and Practice. 2013; 1(2): 160171. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031
  8. 8Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2013; 10(1): e1001363. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363
  9. 9Piette JD, Lun KC, Moura LA, Jr., et al. Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low- and middle-income countries: Where do we go from here? Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2012; 90(5): 365372. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.099069
  10. 10Great Lakes University Kisumu. Systematic Review: World Health Organization; 2013.
  11. 11Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, et al. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): A randomised trial. Lancet (London, England). 2010; 376(9755): 18381845. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61997-6
  12. 12Lee SH, Nurmatov UB, Nwaru BI, Mukherjee M, Grant L and Pagliari C. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Health. 2016; 6(1). DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.010401
  13. 13Nurmatov UB, Lee SH, Nwaru BI, Mukherjee M, Grant L and Pagliari C. The effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Health. 2014; 4(1). DOI: 10.7189/jogh.04.010407
  14. 14Philbrick WC. mHealth and MNCH: State of the evidence. Trends, Gaps, Stakeholder Needs, and Opportunities For Future Research on the Use of Mobile Technology to Improve Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health. mHealth Alliance; 2013.
  15. 15Philbrick WC. mHealth and MNCH: State of the Evidence. Trends, Gaps, Stakeholder Needs, and Opportunities For Future Research on the Use of Mobile Technology to Improve Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health. mHealth Alliance; 2013.
  16. 16Tamrat T and Kachnowski S. Special delivery: An analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2012; 16(5): 10921101. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0836-3
  17. 17Noordam AC, Kuepper BM, Stekelenburg J and Milen A. Improvement of maternal health services through the use of mobile phones. Tropical Medicine & International Health: TM & IH. 2011; 16(5): 622626. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02747.x
  18. 18Colbourn T, Nambiar B, Bondo A, Makwenda C, Tsetekani E, Makonda-Ridley A, Msukwa M, Barker P, Kotagal U, Williams C, Davies R, Webb D, Flatman D, Lewycka S, Rosato M, Kachale F, Mwansambo C and Costello A. Effects of quality improvement in health facilities and community mobilization through women’s groups on maternal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in three districts of Malawi: MaiKhanda, a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Int Health. 2013; 5(3): 180195. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/iht011
  19. 19Mangham-Jefferies L, Pitt C, Cousens S, Mills A and Schellenberg J. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; 14: 243. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-243
  20. 20de la Torre-Diez I, Lopez-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado JS and de Castro C. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: A systematic review. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association. 2015; 21(2): 8185. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0053
  21. 21Agarwal S, LeFevre AE, Lee J, et al. Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2016; 352: i1174. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i1174
  22. 22Alfonso YN, Bishai D, Bua J, Mutebi A, Mayora C and Ekirapa-Kiracho E. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a voucher scheme combined with obstetrical quality improvements: Quasi experimental results from Uganda. Health Policy and Planning. 2015; 30(1): 8899. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czt100
  23. 23Alabi OO, Olarunfemi G and Onile TG. The trend in maternal mortality in an upgraded tertiary facility in North Central Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine: Journal of the National Association of Resident Doctors of Nigeria. 2012; 21(3): 282289.
  24. 24The Lancet. Stillbirths: An Executive Sumary for The Lancet’s Series. The Lancet; 2011.
  25. 25National Population Commission N. 2013 Nigeria Demographic and Health survey (NDHS): North Central; 2013. http://www.population.gov.ng/images/ndhs_data/ndhs_2013/North%20Central%20Zone%20Factsheet.pdf. Accessed November 20th, 2014.
  26. 26Schantz-Dunn J and Nour NM. Malaria and pregnancy: A global health perspective. Reviews in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009; 2(3): 186192.
  27. 27Mechael P, Batavia H, Kaonga N, et al. Barriers and gaps affecting mHealth in low- and middle-income countries: Policy white paper. Columbia University, Earth institute, Center for global health and economic development (CGHED): with mHealth alliance; 2010.
  28. 28Mangone ER, Agarwal S, L’Engle K, et al. Sustainable cost models for mHealth at scale: Modeling program data from m4RH Tanzania. PloS one. 2016; 11(1): e0148011. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148011
  29. 29Vassall A, Mangham-Jefferies L, Gomez GB, Pitt C and Foster N. Incorporating demand and supply constraints into economic evaluations in low-income and middle-income countries. Health Economics. 2016; 25(Suppl 1): 95115. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3306
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.2364 | Journal eISSN: 2214-9996
Language: English
Published on: Nov 5, 2018
Published by: Levy Library Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Diana M. Bowser, Donald S. Shepard, Allyala Nandakumar, Adeyemi Okunogbe, Tyler Morrill, Yara Halasa-Rappell, Monica Jordan, Farida Mushi, Carolyn Boyce, Oluwayemisi A. Erhunmwunse, published by Levy Library Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.