Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Ponto-Caspian and native amphipod life history in the Daugava River, Latvia Cover

The Ponto-Caspian and native amphipod life history in the Daugava River, Latvia

By: Jana Paidere and  Aija Brakovska  
Open Access
|Nov 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Sampling sites of amphipods along the Daugava River
Sampling sites of amphipods along the Daugava River

Figure 2

Population structure of Gammarus varsoviensis and Pontogammarus robustoides in the Daugava River during the study, by size
Population structure of Gammarus varsoviensis and Pontogammarus robustoides in the Daugava River during the study, by size

Figure 3

Population structure of Gammarus pulex in the Daugava River during the study, by size
Population structure of Gammarus pulex in the Daugava River during the study, by size

Figure 4

Ovigerous females of Gammarus varsoviensis in the Daugava River during the study
Ovigerous females of Gammarus varsoviensis in the Daugava River during the study

Figure 5

Proportions of adults, immature specimens and juveniles of Gammarus varsoviensis in the Daugava River during the study
Proportions of adults, immature specimens and juveniles of Gammarus varsoviensis in the Daugava River during the study

Figure 6

Ovigerous females of Pontogammarus robustoides in the Daugava River during the study
Ovigerous females of Pontogammarus robustoides in the Daugava River during the study

Figure 7

Proportion of adults, immature specimens and juveniles of Pontogammarus robustoides in the Daugava River during the study
Proportion of adults, immature specimens and juveniles of Pontogammarus robustoides in the Daugava River during the study

Figure 8

Ovigerous females of Gammarus pulex in the Daugava River during the study
Ovigerous females of Gammarus pulex in the Daugava River during the study

Figure 9

Proportion of adults, immature specimens and juveniles of Gammarus pulex in the Daugava River during the study
Proportion of adults, immature specimens and juveniles of Gammarus pulex in the Daugava River during the study

Figure 10

The average water temperature of the study sites in the Daugava River during the study
The average water temperature of the study sites in the Daugava River during the study

Reproductive parameters of amphipod species during the study

201720182019
G. varsoviensis
n346832
Average size of ovigerous females, mm11.2 ± 1.1 SDmin. 9.0max. 13.011.3 ± 1.2 SDmin. 9.0max. 13.511.4 ± 1.3 SDmin. 9.6max. 14.5
Average number of eggs per brood26 ± 11 SDmin. 9max. 5030 ± 13 SDmin. 9max. 6037 ± 14 SDmin. 9max. 69
P. robustoides
novigerous females were not obtained2217
Average size of ovigerous females, mm-11.6 ± 1.3 SDmin. 9.4max. 15.010.9 ± 1.5 SDmin. 9.0max. 15.0
Average number of eggs per brood-25 ± 16 SDmin. 8max. 5731 ± 22 SDmin. 13max. 81
G. pulex
n8only two ovigerous females were obtainedonly one ovigerous female was obtained
Average size of ovigerous females, mm10.7 ± 0.5 SDmin. 9.0max. 12.0--
Average number of eggs per brood27 ± 5 SDmin. 11max. 41--

Air temperature and precipitation in Latvia during the study*

201720182019Latvian norm
Annual mean air temperature, °C+6.9+7.6+8.2+6.4
Annual total precipitation (mean in Latvia), mm809.8472.7629.2685.6
Spring
Average air temperature, °C+5.6+6.9+7.2+5.6
Precipitation, mm116.380.7100.5122.7
Summer
Average air temperature, °C+15.4+18.1+17.2+16.2
Precipitation, mm237.0162.4176.7225.7
Autumn
Average air temperature, °C+7.6+8.6+8.3+6.7
Precipitation, mm313.5124.3236.7201.0

Background characteristics of the sampling sites during the study

Characteristics“Daugavpils”“Jēkabpils”“Veczeļki”“Gostiņi”
Position55°52′04″N26°30′32″E56°29′52″N25°53′30″E56°31′50″N25°47′01″E56°36′56″N25°45′31″E
GammaridsG. varsoviensis2017, n 3422018, n 3892019, n 299G. varsoviensis2017, n 4372018, n 912019, n 87G. varsoviensis2017, n 7P. robustoides2017, n 422018, n 2862019, n 352
G. pulex2017, n 202019, n 3
G. pulex2017, n 672018, n 362019, n 15P. robustoides2019, n 174
2018 no sampled
Substratesand, silty sand covered by detritus, some pebble and boulders, emergent and submerged macrophytessand, silty sand covered by detritus, emergent and submerged macrophytessand, fine gravel, pebble and some boulders covered by detritus, emergent macrophytessand, silty sand covered by detritus, some pebble and boulders, emergent and submerged macrophytes
2017, monthV–XV–IXV–IXV–IX
average (range)
T (°C)16.03 (9.76–20.45)18.14 (15.75–20.47)17.86 (15.38–20.25)17.42 (14.14–20.52)
Cond. (μS cm−1)306 (251–335)313 (280–337)311 (274–334)317 (274–375)
DO (mg l−1)7.67 (6.09–9.19)7.45 (6.31–8.83)8.20 (9.57–7.19)7.74 (5.11–9.94)
pH7.96 (7.72–8.24)8.05 (7.84–8.14)8.16 (7.98–8.47)8.12 (7.51–8.60)
CHL (μg l−1)3.89 (2.84–5.45)4.98 (3.38–8.30)3.23 (2.97–3.65)4.68 (3.20–5.61)
2018, monthV–XV–X V–X
average (range)
T (°C)18.62 (11.79–21.97)17.16 (6.42–23.01)2018no measured17.86 (6.56–23.62)
Cond. (μS cm−1)382 (233–467)367 (280–404)404 (390–427)
DO (mg l−1)9.60 (7.51–13.75)8.48 (6.19–11.16)9.63 (6.62–11.71)
pH8.73 (8.16–9.22)8.81 (8.45–9.06)9.00 (8.92–9.41)
CHL (μg l−1)3.26 (1.77–6.69)3.99 (3.06–5.19)4.56 (3.96–5.30)
2019, monthIV–IXIV–IXVI–IXVI–IX
average (range)
T (°C)18.13 (11.42–22.18)18.28 (13.05–22.68)19.68 (13.27–23.22)20.79 (14.61–23.12)
Cond. (μS cm−1)354 (216–512)316 (227–378)341 (289–374)342 (288–377)
DO (mg l−1)8.13 (6.39–10.64)7.83 (5.91–9.94)8.20 (6.33–10.19)10.18 (8.00–13.67)
pH7.73 (7.38–8.20)7.80 (7.41–8.19)8.09 (7.77–8.29)8.40 (8.06–8.95)
CHL (μg l−1)4.39 (3.03–8.26)4.39 (2.16–6.89)2.96 (2.11–4.29)4.21 (2.95–6.60)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26881/oahs-2022.3.03 | Journal eISSN: 1897-3191 | Journal ISSN: 1730-413X
Language: English
Page range: 268 - 282
Submitted on: Sep 21, 2021
Accepted on: May 17, 2022
Published on: Nov 7, 2022
Published by: University of Gdańsk
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Jana Paidere, Aija Brakovska, published by University of Gdańsk
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.