Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Transferring the intangible: applying Rome I to the sale of non-fungible tokens Cover
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Ante, L., Fiedler, I. (2025). The New Digital Economy: How Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) are Transforming Value Creation, Ownership Models, and Economic Systems. Digital Business, 5 (1), pp. 1-4. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100094
  2. Court of Justice of the European Union, 17.06.1992., Case No. C-26/91 Handte, ECLI:EU:C:1992:268.
  3. Court of Justice of the European Union, 23.04.2009., Case No. C-533/07 Falco, ECLI:EU:C:2009:257.
  4. Court of Justice of the European Union, 25.02.2010., Case No. C-381/08 Car Trim, ECLI:EU:C:2010:90.
  5. Court of Justice of the European Union, 28.07.2016., Case No. C-191/15 Verein für Konsumenteninformation, ECLI:EU:C:2016:612.
  6. Court of Justice of the European Union, Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak, 27.01.2009., Case No. C-533/07 Falco, ECLI:EU:C:2009:34.
  7. EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum. (2021). NFT – Legal token classification. https://blockchain-observatory.ec.europa.eu/publications/nft-legal-token-classification_en [Accessed 26 August 2025].
  8. European Law Institute. (2023). ELI principles on blockchain technology, smart contracts and consumer protection. https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Principles_on_Blockchain_Technology__Smart_Contracts_ and_Consumer_Protection.pdf [Accessed 07 August 2025].
  9. Falokun, T.J. (2023). Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Disputes Relating to Cross-Border NFT Transactions: The Case for Uniform Private International Law Rules. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 27 (2), pp. 49-99.
  10. Garrido, J.M. (2023). Digital Tokens: A Legal Perspective. IMF Working Papers No. 151. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400250149.001 [Accessed 02 August 2025].
  11. Gherghelas, S. (2025). State of the Dapp industry Q2 2025. https://dappradar.com/blog/state-of-the-dapp-industry-q2-2025 [Accessed 07 August 2025].
  12. Giuliano, M., Lagarde, P. (1980). Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations by Mario Giuliano, Professor, University of Milan; and Paul Lagarde, Professor, University of Paris I, Official Journal of the European Union, C 282, 31.10.1980. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_198 0_282_R_0001_01 [Accessed 02 August 2025].
  13. Harrak, M.E. (2023). ‘Do smart contracts need new conflict-of-laws rules?’, in A. Bonomi, M. Lehmann and S. Lalani (eds), Blockchain and Private International Law, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_019
  14. International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). (2023). UNIDROIT principles on digital assets and private law. https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Principles-on-Digital-Assets-and-Private-Law-linked-1.pdf [Accessed 08 August 2025].
  15. Kleczewski, A.G. (2023). ‘The good, the bad and the ugly: The private international law, the crypto transactions and the pseudonyms’, in A. Bonomi, M. Lehmann and S. Lalani (eds), Blockchain and Private International Law, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_008
  16. Law Commission. (2024). Digital assets and ETDs in private international law: Which court, which law? https://cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/54/2025/01/Digital-Assets-and-ETDs-in-Private-International-Law-SUMMARY.pdf [Accessed 26 July 2025].
  17. Lee, L. (2024). Examining the Legal Status of Digital Assets as Property: A Comparative Analysis of Jurisdictional Approaches. SSRN, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4807135
  18. Lehmann, M. (2024). Digital Assets in the Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Search for the Ideal Rule. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 1, pp. 198-222. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4862792
  19. López Rodríguez, A.M. (2024). Law applicable to virtual real estate in the metaverse. https://catedrametaverso.ua.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Law-Applicable-to-Virtual-Real-Estate-in-the-Metaverse-LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ.pdf [Accessed 26 July 2025].
  20. Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. (2017). Rome I RegulationCommentary, Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt.
  21. Mariański, M. (2024). Reflections on the Possible Application of Rome I Regulation to Obligations Related to Crypto-Assets. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 34 (1), pp. 23-39. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.4.02
  22. Martínez Luna, W.F., Moreno Ballesteros, A.M., Ruiz Dorantes, E.J. (2024). Linking a Digital Asset to an NFT—Technical and Legal Analysis. Laws, 13 (5), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13050059
  23. OpenSea. (2025). Terms of service. https://opensea.io/tos [Accessed 31 July 2025].
  24. Oppenhoff. (2023). Digital products in the metaverse: How NFTs enable the attribution and distribution of digital products and what legal aspects distributors must consider. https://www.oppenhoff. eu/en/news/detail/digital-products-in-the-metaverse-how-nfts-enable-the-attribution-and-distribution-of-digital-products-and-what-legal-aspects-distributors-must-consider/[Accessed 26 July 2025].
  25. Reguerra, E. (2024). NFTs record $8.8B sales volume in 2024 – CryptoSlam. https://cointelegraph.com/news/nft-total-sales-volume-2024-data-december [Accessed 07 August 2025].
  26. Regulation (EC) No. 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I). Official Journal of the European Union, L 177/6. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/593/oj [Accessed 11 August 2025].
  27. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No. 1093/2010 and (EU) No. 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937. Official Journal of the European Union, L 150/40. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj [Accessed 11 August 2025].
  28. Ripley, B.Y. (2024). ‘The law applicable to (digital) transfer of digital assets: the transfer of cryptocurrencies via blockchains’, in M.M. Fogt (ed), Private International Law in an Era of Change, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4613821
  29. Ripley, B.Y., Heindler, F. (2023). ‘The law applicable to crypto assets: What policy choices are ahead of us?’ in A. Bonomi, M. Lehmann and S. Lalani (eds), Blockchain and Private International Law, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_011
  30. Rühl, G. (2021). ‘Smart (legal) contracts, or: Which (contract) law for smart contracts?’ in B. Cappiello and G. Carullo (eds), Blockchain, Law and Governance, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52722-8_11
  31. Tan, C. (2024). Rights in NFTS and the Flourishing of NFT Marketplaces. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 32, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae018
  32. Tashev, T. (2025). The Most Expensive NFTs Ever Sold [2025 Edition]. https://www.webopedia.com/crypto/learn/top-10-most-expensive-nfts-ever-sold/[Accessed 07 August 2025].
  33. Weller, M. (2015). ‘Article 1. Material scope’, in G.P. Calliess (ed), Rome Regulations. Commentary, Second Edn., The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International BV.
  34. Wendehorst, C. (2024). ‘Proprietary rights in digital assets and the conflict of laws’, in A. Bonomi, et al. (eds), Blockchain and Private International Law, Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_007
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 87
Published on: Sep 30, 2025
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 times per year

© 2025 Paula Lipe, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.