Reconceptualizing the right to be forgotten: constitutional lacunae in Pakistan and legislative insights from Latvia
References
- Alessi, S. (2017). Eternal sunshine: The right to be forgotten in the European Union after the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation. Emory International Law Review, 32(1), 145–171. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol32/iss1/4
- Allegri, M. R. (2022). The right to be forgotten in the digital age. In F. Comunello, F. Martire, & L. Sabetta (Eds.), What people leave behind (Vol. 7, pp. [page range if available]). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11756-5_15
- Ali, M. I., & Hussain, K. A. (2024). Unveiling the tapestry: A comparative investigation into data-protection legislation in India and Pakistan. Socrates, 1(28), 1-8.
- Balodis, R., Kārkliņa, A. & Danovskis, E. (2023). The development of constitutional and administrative law in Latvia after the restoration of independence. Juridiskā Zinātne, 5, 44–119.
- Bytes for All v. Federation of Pakistan, W.P. No. 958/2013 (Islamabad High Court).
- Consumer Rights Protection Centre v. Private individual, ECLI:LV:AT:2023:0807. A420234319.27.L (Latvia Supreme Court, Department of Administrative Cases, Aug. 7, 2023).
- Čtvrtník, M. (2023). Personality rights, privacy, and post-mortem privacy protection in archives: International comparison, Germany and “protection of legitimate interests.” In Archives and Records. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18667-7_2
- Dupate, K. (2016). The constitutional social security rights in Latvia. Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej, 23, 125–140.
- Eberle, E. J. (2012). Observations on the development of human dignity and personality in German constitutional law: An overview. Liverpool Law Review, 33, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-012-9120-x
- Eskens, S., Helberger, N., & Moeller, J. (2017). Challenged by news personalisation: Five perspectives on the right to receive information. Journal of Media Law, 9(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2017.1387353
- Frantziou, E. (2014). Further developments in the right to be forgotten: The European Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-131/12, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. Human Rights Law Review, 14(4), 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu033
- Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, Case C-131/12, EU:C:2014:317 (Court of Justice of the European Union).
- Hoofnagle, C. J., van der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: What it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501
- Jabeen Khan, A., Mushtaq, S. A., Siddique, M. A., & Wadood, M. A. (2025). The right to be forgotten in the digital age: A Pakistani perspective on balancing data protection & privacy, freedom of expression, and cyber security. Journal for Social Science Archives, 3(1), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i1.126
- Jawwad S. Khawaja v. Federation of Pakistan, PLD 2024 SC 337.
- Juliussen, R. J. (2023). Algorithms that forget: Machine unlearning and the right to erasure. Computer Law and Security Review, 51, 105885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105885
- Khan, A. S., Gul, R., Naznin, S., & Khan, Y. (2022). The right to privacy, its progress & decline: A critical review. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 331–340.
- Krūma, K., & Statkus, S. (2019). The Constitution of Latvia – A bridge between traditions and modernity. In A. Albi & S. Bardutzky (Eds.), National constitutions in European and global governance: Democracy, rights, the rule of law (Vol. 2). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6_20
- McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043
- Milanovic, M. (2015). Human rights treaties and foreign surveillance: Privacy in the digital age. Harvard International Law Journal, 56(1), 81–146.
- Munir Ahmad Bhati v. Director FIA Cyber Crime Wing, Lahore, PLD 2022 Lahore 664.
- Naef, T. (2023). The global reach of the right to data protection. In Data protection without data protectionism (Vol. 28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19893-9_2
- Nikiforova, A. (2018). Open data quality evaluation: A comparative analysis of open data in Latvia. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 6(4), 363-386.
- Potaičuks, A. (2024). Data protection under review of Constitutional Court: Administrative databases directly accessible to public authorities. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 14(2), 73–87.
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng
- Sarwar, L. G., Azhar, M. M., & Baig, M. S. R. (2024). The role of judicial activism in the enforcement of human rights in Pakistan and its impacts on governance in Pakistan. Global Legal Studies Review, IX(III), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2024(IX-III).01
- Shulztiner, D., & Carmi, G. E. (2014). Human dignity in national constitutions: Functions, promises and dangers. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 62(2), 461–490.
- Smith, M. L., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. IDIS, 2, 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0039-x
- Stainforth, E. (2021). Collective memory or the right to be forgotten? Cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union. Memory Studies, 15(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980211044707
- Taylor, P. M. (2020). Article 17: Privacy, home, correspondence; honour and reputation. In A commentary on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: The UN Human Rights Committee’s monitoring of ICCPR rights (pp. 458–498). Cambridge University Press.
- The Monal Group of Companies v. Capital Development Authority, PLD 2024 SC 925.
- W.W. v. Germany, Apps. No. 60798/10 and 65599/10 (European Court of Human Rights, 2018).
- Youm, K. H., & Park, A. (2023). The right to be forgotten: Google Spain as a benchmark for free speech versus privacy? Chicago Journal of International Law, 24(1), 167–186. https://chicagoun-bound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol24/iss1/9
- Yongmei, C., & Afzal, J. (2023). Impact of enactment of ‘The Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016’ as legal support in Pakistan. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v3i2.500
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.32.2025.2.26-33 | Journal eISSN: 2256-0548
Language: English
Page range: 26 - 33
Published on: Sep 30, 2025
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 LL.M Muhammad Imran Ali, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.