References
- Aron-Beller, K. (2019). Ghettoization: The Papal Enclosure and Its Jews. In P. M. Jones, B. Wisch, & S. Ditchfield (Eds.), A Companion to Early Modern Rome, 1492–1692 (pp. 232–246). Brill.
- Atuahene, B. (2016). Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration: Creating a New Theoretical Framework for Understanding Involuntary Property Loss and the Remedies Required. Law & Social Inquiry, 41(4), 796–823. https://doi.org/ DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12249
- Balodis, K., & Snipe, A. (2019). Origins of Separated Ownership and Possible Solutions for Unifying Thereof. Journal of the University of Latvia. Law, 12, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.12.10
- Bertrand, E. (2010). The three roles of the “Coase theorem” in Coase's works. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(4), 975–1000. http://10.0.4.56/09672560903552553
- Bourne, R. (2014). The Flaws In Rent Ceilings. Institute Of Economic Affairs Discussion Paper, 55(55), 1–44.
- Bunting, W. C. (2014). Resolving Conflict over Scarce Resources: Private versus Shared Ownership. SSRN Electronic Journal, 893–929. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2446712
- Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972a). Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85(6), 1089. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340059
- Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972b). Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85(6), 1089. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340059
- Civil law, Valdîbas Vçstnesis (1937). https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/225418-civil-law
- Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/724810
- Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. (2006). Case No. 2005-16-01. https://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2005/07/2005-16-01_Spriedums_ENG.pdf
- Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. (2009). Case No. 2008-36-01. http://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/web/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2008-36-01_Spriedums_ENG.pdf
- Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia. (2018). Case No. 2017-17-01. http://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/en/press-release/the-norms-which-as-of-1-january-2018-decrease-the-amount-of-compulsory-land-lease-are-incompatible-with-the-satversme/
- Cooter, R. (1982). The Cost of Coase. The Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 1–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/724153
- Cooter, R., & Ulen, T. (2012). Law & economics. (Sixth edit). Pearson/Addison-Wesley.
- Crowder, R. W. (1994). Restitution in the Czech Republic: Problems and Prague-nosis. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 5(1), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.18060/17562
- de Soto, H. (2017). Excerpts from the Mystery of Capital The Role of Property in Secure Societies: Panel 1: Land Titling, Inclusion, and the Role of Property Rights in Secure Societies. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal, 6, 9–72.
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals. (1977). Apartment Office Bldg., Etc. v. Washington, 381 A.2d 588 (Vol. 381).
- European Court of Human Rights. (1979). MARCKX v. BELGIUM (application No. 6833/74).
- Heller, M., & Serkin, C. (1999). Revaluing Restitution: From the Talmud to Postsocialism. In Michigan Law Review (Vol. 97, Issue 6, p. 1385). University of Michigan Law School. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290212
- Marcuse, P. (1996). Privatization and its Discontents: Property Rights in Land and Housing in the Transition in Eastern Europe. In Cities After Socialism (pp. 119–191). https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/9780470712733.ch5
- McNeely, K. P. (1986). Rent control. Howard Law Journal VO - 29, 1, 165–175.
- Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the Right to Exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77(4), 730–755.
- Miceli, T. J. (2011). The economic theory of eminent domain : private property, public use. Cambridge University Press.
- Murphy, C. (2017). The conceptual foundations of transitional justice. Cambridge University Press.
- Rowen, J., & Snipe, A. (2021). The Promise and Perils of Urban Land Restitution in Latvia. International Journal of Transitional Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijaa028
- Snipe, A. (2019a). Amount of the Lease Fee in the Compulsory Land Lease Relations. Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.18
- Snipe, A. (2019b). Separation of ownership and compulsory land lease in Latvia: challenges and solutions. Social Sciences Bulletin, 1(28), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.9770/szv.2019.1(4)
- Snipe, A. (2020a). Compulsory Land Lease in the Cities of the Republic of Latvia: the Cases Where Privatized Multi-Apartment Buildings Are Located on Restituted Land : summary of doctoral thesis submitted for the doctoral degree in law, subfield of civil law / Arta Snipe (K. Balodis, E. Danovskis, L. Universitâte. J. Fakultâte, & L. Universitâte, Eds.). https://dom.lndb.lv/data/obj/file/29315371.pdf
- Snipe, A. (2020b). Zemes piespiedu noma Latvijas Republikas pilsçtâs, ja uz zemes atrodas privatizçta daudzdzîvokïu dzîvojamâ mâja : promocijas darbs / Arta Snipe (K. Balodis & L. Universitâte. J. Fakultâte, Eds.). https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/52943
- Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. (1971). Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, 266 N.E.2d 876, 358 Mass. 686 (Vol. 358).
- Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (1999). Policy analysis : concepts and practice. (Third edit). Prentice Hall.
- Willis, J. W. (1950). Short History of Rent Control Laws. Cornell Law Quarterly, 36(1), 54–94.