Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Protection against expropriation of investments under the European Convention on human rights Cover

Protection against expropriation of investments under the European Convention on human rights

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. Award of 2016 December 19 of ICSID in case Garanti Koza v Turkmenistan Award, Case No. ARB/11/20,
  2. Award OF 24 July 2008 of ICSID in case Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, Case No. ARB/05/22
  3. Award of ICSID in case ADC v Hungary No. ARB/03/16.
  4. Award of ICSID in case Lauder v Czech Republic.
  5. Award of ICSID in case Parkerings v Lithuania No. ARB/05/8.
  6. Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.Ş. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
  7. de Nanteuil, A. (2014) L'expropriation indirecte en droit international de l'investissement. Pedone.
  8. Douglas, Z (2005). The International Law of Investment Claims, Cambridge University Press.
  9. ECHR guide on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights-Protection of Property.
  10. Johanne Cox. (2019) Expropriation in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Oxford University Press.
  11. José R. Mata Dona, Nikos Lavranos ed. (2021) International Arbitration and EU Law, Edward Elgar.
  12. Judgment of CJEU in case Achmea C-284/16.
  13. Judgment of ECHR in James and Others v. the United Kingdom, petition No. 8793/79.
  14. Judgment of ECHR judgment in case Platakou v. Greece, petition No. 38460/97.
  15. Judgment of the ECHR in case Gudmundsson v Iceland, petition No. 31549/03.
  16. Judgment of the ECHR in case Iatridis v. Greece, petition No. 31107/96.
  17. Judgment of the ECHR in case in case Handyside v. the United Kingdom, petition No. 5493/72
  18. Judgment of the ECHR in case in case Lithgow and other v. the United Kingdom, petitions No. 9006/80; 9262/81; 9263/81; 9265/81; 9266/81; 9313/81; 9405/81.
  19. Judgment of the ECHR in case Marckx v Belgium, petition No. 6833/74.
  20. Judgment of the ECHR in case Öneryildiz v. Turkey, petition No. 48939/99.
  21. Judgment of the ECHR in case Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden, petition No. 7151/75 (A/52).
  22. Judgment of the PCJI in case Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Germany v. Poland), PCIJ Series A, No. 7.
  23. Kriebaum, U. (2009) Is the European Court of Human Rights an Alternative to Investor-State Arbitration?, Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration (2009).
  24. Omtzig, P. (2016) Human Rights compatibility of investor-State arbitration in international investment protection agreements, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Council of Europe.
  25. Redfern and Hunter. (2015) International Arbitration, 6th ed, OUP.
  26. Stern, B. (2007) In search of the frontiers of Indirect expropriation, Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation. The Fordham Papers.
  27. Yves Fortier, L. (2004) Indirect Expropriation in the Law of International Investment: I Know It When I See It, or Caveat Investor, ICSID Review Foreign Investment Law Journal 19(2).
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 41
Published on: May 31, 2023
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2023 Dalia Višinskytė, Jelena Čuveljak, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.