Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Aspects of Contractual Relations in Healthcare Cover

References

  1. Adusumalli, J., Benkhadra, K., & Murad, M. H. (eds). (2018). Good Samaritan Laws and Graduate Medical Education: A Tristate Survey. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovation, Quality & Outcomes, 2(4), 336–341.
  2. American Medical Association. (2016). AMA Principles of Medical Ethics. https://www.amaassn.org/delivering-care/ama-principles-medical-ethics [rev. 04.08.2022].
  3. Appelbaum, P. S. (1997). A theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25(3), 233–247.
  4. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress J. F. (2012). Principles of Biotmedical Ethics, 7th Edition. Oxford University Press, 480 p.
  5. Bishop, Ch. & Chau, D. (2011). What is Our Ethical Duty to Malingerers? Annals of Long-Term Care, November, 36–40.
  6. Charatan, F. (2004). US doctors debate refusing treatment to malpractice lawyers. British Medical Journal, 328, 1518. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1518
  7. Cruz, P. D. (2001). Comparative health law, 1st edition. Routledge-Cavendish: 784 pages.
  8. Daugavpils tiesa, 2015. gada 5. jūnija Sprieduma noraksts, Lietas Nr. 112015515, Lietas arhīva Nr. 1-0155-15/14.
  9. Davies, C. E., & Shaul, R. Z. (2010). Physicians' legal duty of care and legal right to refuse to work during a pandemic. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 182(2), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091628
  10. Delgado, J. (2021). Vulnerability as a key concept in relational patient- centered professionalism. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 24(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09995-8/
  11. Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. Official Journal L, 311, 28/11/2001, p. 0067–0128.
  12. Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare, OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45–65.
  13. Draper, H., & Sorell, T. (eds.) (2002). Patients' responsibilities in medical ethics. Bioethics, 16(4), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00292
  14. Dupuis, H. M. (2000). Professional autonomy: a stumbling block for good medical practice. An analysis and interpretation. Theor Med Bioeth, 21(5): 493–502. doi:10.1023/a:1009929523944. PMID: 11142444.
  15. English, D. (2005). Moral Obligations of Patients: A Clinical View. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30(2), 139–152. doi:10.1080/03605310590926821
  16. European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety: Patients' Rights in the European Union Mapping eXercise Final Report, 2018.
  17. European Union: European Parliament, “Resolution on safer healthcare in Europe: improving patient safety and fighting antimicrobial resistance (2014/2207(INI))”, European Parliament, 19 May 2015, Official Journal of the European Union, 27.09.2016., 03.08.2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015IP0197&rid=7 [rev. 04.08.2022].
  18. Francis, R. (2013). The Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. HC 898-111. London: Stationary Office.
  19. Gardiner, S., Morrison, D., & Robinson, S. (eds.) (2022). Integrity in Public Life: Reflections on a Duty of Candour. Public Integrity, 24: 2, 217–228, doi:10.1080/10999922.2021.1903165
  20. Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (eds.). (1998). Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. Psychiatry Publications. https://escholar-ship.umassmed.edu/psych_pp/314 [rev. 02.08.2022].
  21. Hall, M. A. (2019). Fiduciary Principles in Health Care. In The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law, ed. by Evan J. Criddle, Paul B. Miller, and Robert H. Sitkoff. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 997 p.
  22. Hu, L. Y. (2016). Professional-Patient Relationship. In: Have, H. (eds). Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_352
  23. Hull, S. C. (2019). Not so conscientious objection: When can doctors refuse to treat? STAT, Nov. 8. https://www.statnews.com/2019/11/08/conscientious-objection-doctors-refuse-treatment/
  24. International Conference of Medical Professional Associations and Bodies with similar remits, 6 January 1987. Principles of European Medical Ethics. http://www.ceom-ecmo.eu/sites/default/files/documents/european_medical_ethics_principles-1987-1995_ceom_cio_0.pdf [rev. 03.08.2022].
  25. Latgales apgabaltiesa, anonimizēts 2015. gada 21. septembra spriedums, Lietas Nr. 112015515, Lietas arhīva Nr. 103AA-0070-15. manas.tiesas.lv.
  26. Latvijas Republikas Augstākās Tiesas Senāta Administratīvo lietu departamenta spriedums 26.06.2008. lietā nr. SKA-155/2008 “Tiesiskā daba slimnīcas rīcībai, neziņojot personai par tās asinīs identificētām vīrusa antivielām; valsts aģentūras “Sabiedrības veselības aģentūra” pienākumi un rīcība epidemioloìiskās drošības jomā”.
  27. Latvijas Republikas likums: Ārstniecības likums / Law of the Republic of Latvia, Medical Treatment Law, Latvijas Vēstnesis, 167/168, 01.07.1997.
  28. Latvijas Republikas likums: Civillikums / Law of the Republic of Latvia: The civil law. Valdības Vēstnesis, 41, 20.02.1937.
  29. Miller, S. (2011). Fiduciary Obligations: The Devil's in the Details, Society for Human Resource Management. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-news/Pages/erisadetails.aspx.
  30. Ministru kabineta 2009. gada 20. janvāra Noteikumi Nr. 60 “Noteikumi par obligātajām prasībām ārstniecības iestādēm un to struktūrvienībām”. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 23, 11.02.2009. / Republic of Latvia, Cabinet Regulation No. 60, Adopted 20 January 2009. Regulations Regarding Mandatory Requirements for Medical Treatment Institutions and Their Structural Units.
  31. Ministru kabineta 2018. gada 28. augusta noteikumi Nr. 555 “Veselības aprūpes pakalpojumu organizēšanas un samaksas kārtība” / Republic of Latvia Cabinet Regulation No. 555 Adopted 28 August 2018 Procedures for the Organisation of and Payment for Health Care Services. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 176, 05.09.2018.
  32. Naik, A. D., Dyer, C. B., Kunik, M. E., & McCullough, L. B. (eds). (2009). Patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: a two-component re-conceptualization. The American Journal of Bioethics, Feb; 9(2): 23–30. doi:10.1080/15265160802654111. PMID:19180389; PMCID: PMC2860530.
  33. Pacientu tiesību likums / Law on the Rights of Patients: Latvijas Republikas likums. (2009). Latvijas Vēstnesis Nr. 205 (4191), 30.12.2009.
  34. Pearlston, M., & Danson, N. (2018). Lessons from the Case of Dr. Hadiza Bawa-Garba. Health Law in Canada Journal, 39(1), 9–16.
  35. Reynolds, J. M. K., & Mitchell, C. (2019). ‘Inglan is a bitch’: hostile NHS charging regulations contravene the ethical principles of the medical profession. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45: 497–503.
  36. Rēzeknes tiesu nams, Administratīva rajona tiesa, 2016. gada 18. februāra Spriedums, Lietas Nr. A420250815, Lietas arhīva Nr. A42-00513-16/44.
  37. Picard, E. I., & Robertson, G. B. (eds.). (2007). Legal Liability of Physicians and Hospitals in Canada. 4th ed. Toronto (ON): Thomson Carswell, 552 p..
  38. Roca, R. P. (2020). High-Value Mental Health Care and the Person in the Room. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 71(2), 110–111. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900357
  39. Russell, B. (2009). Patient Autonomy Writ Large. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(2), 32–34.
  40. Salm, C. (2016). Protection of vulnerable adults: European added value assessment accompanying the European Parliament's legislative initiative report (rapporteur: Joëlle Bergeron), European Parliament, 2016, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/664256
  41. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2003. Christoph-Dornier-Stiftung für Klinische Psychologie v Finanzamt Gießen. Case C-45/01. Reports of Cases 2003 I-12911. ECLI:EU:C:2003:595.
  42. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2003, Case C-212/01 Margarande Unterpertinger v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter. European Court Reports 2003 I-13859. ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:625. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62001CJ0212
  43. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 21 March 2013. Skatteverket v PCF Clinic AB. Case C-91/12. Digital reports (Court Reports – general), ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2013:198/CJEU Judgment of 23 March 2013, PFC Clinic, C-91/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013.
  44. Tunc, A. Torts II: “physicians”, in Tunc, A. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Part I), 1973, Nijhoff.
  45. Weiss, K. J. & Landon, V. D. (2017). Liability for Diagnosing Malingering. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, September 2017, 45(3), 339–347.
  46. Wicclair, M. R. (2016). Conscientious Objection. In: ten Have H. (eds). Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham, 3460 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_118
  47. Wijesuriya, J. D., & Walker, D. (2017). Duty of candour: a statutory obligation or just the right thing to do? British Journal of Anaesthesia, 119(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex156
  48. World Medical Association. (2009). Medical Ethics Manual, 2nd edition (translation): Pasaules medicīnas asociācija, Medicīnas ētikas rokasgrāmata, II izdevums. Latvijas Ārstu biedrība. https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ethics_manual_latvian.pdf [rev. 29.05.2022].
  49. World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Physician Independence and Professional Freedom, Adopted by the 38th World Medical Assembly Rancho Mirage, CA, USA, October 1986 and rescinded at the WMA General Assembly, Santiago 2005.
  50. Xie, G., Cong, Y. (2016). Conflict of Interest. In: Have, H. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham, 3460 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_116
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 105
Published on: Dec 23, 2022
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2022 Marina Losevich, Aigars Laizāns, Inga Kudeikina, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.