Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Challenges of Digitalisation in Judicial System Cover

References

  1. Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (eds). (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective. Peer J Computer Science 2: e93.
  2. Barraud, B. (2017). Un algorithme capable de prédire les décisions des juges: vers une robotisation de la justice? Les Cahiers de la Justice, 2017/1, pp. 121–139.
  3. Classification module. Equivant. Available: https://www.equivant.com/classification/
  4. Contini, F., Lanzara, G. F. (eds). (2017). The elusive mediation between law and technology’ in P. Branco, N. Hosen, M. Leone and R. Mohr (eds). Tools of Meaning: Representation, Objects, and Agency in the Technologies of Law and Religion, I Saggi di Lexia, Aracne, Rome, 2018, pp. 4–9.
  5. Council of Europe. (2018). Algorithms and human rights: Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques and possible regulatory implications. English edition. Available: https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5
  6. Council of Europe. (2018). European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. Available: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c
  7. Craford, K. (2016). Artificial Intelligence’s White Guy Problem. The New York Times, June 25, 2016.
  8. ECHR, 28 June 2007, No. 76240/01, Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg.
  9. ECHR, 27 May 2010, No. 18811/02, Hohenzoblernc v. Roumanie, pt. 43.
  10. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence and amending certain Union Legislative Acts. COM (2021) 206 final 2021/0106 (COD).
  11. European Commission. (2020). White Paper On Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust. COM (2020) 65 final.
  12. Fair Trials. Automatic injustice: The use of artificial intelligence & automated decision-making systems in criminal justice in Europe, pp.11–12. Available: https://policehumanrightsresources.org/content/uploads/2021/09/Automating_Injustice.pdf?x19059
  13. Ferrié, S.-M. (2018). Les algorithmes à l’épreuve du droit au procès equitable. Procédures, No. 4, Avril 2018, pp. 4–9.
  14. Garapon, A. (2017). Les enjeux de la justice prédictive. La Semaine Juridique. Edition générale, No. 1–2, 9 janvier 2017.
  15. Meneceur, Y. (2018). Quel avenir pour la “justice prédictive”? La Semaine Juridique. Edition générale, No. 7, 12 février 2018, pp. 316–322.
  16. Sauvé, J.-M. La justice prédictive, Colloque organisé à l’occasion du bicentenaire de l’Ordre des avocats au Conseil d’Etat et à la Cour de cassation, Cour de cassation (12. 02.2018).
  17. Surden, H. (2014). Machine Learning and Law. Wash. L. Rev. 89:87, 87–90.
  18. The UK International Consumer Centre. Available: https://www.odrcontactpoint.uk/
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 60
Published on: Sep 30, 2022
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2022 Irēna Kucina, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.