Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Services: International to National Perspective Cover

Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Services: International to National Perspective

By: Vita Upeniece  
Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Act on conscientious objection to military service: Netherlands Law, 1962. https://wetten.over-heid.nl/BWBR0002386/2020-01-01 [rev. 24.03.2022].
  2. Alternatīvā dienesta likums: Latvijas Republikas likums. (2002). Latvijas Vēstnesis, Nr. 91, 18.06.2002. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/63406-alternativa-dienesta-likums [rev. 24.03.2022].
  3. Bayatyan vs. Armenia. (2011). Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Bayatyan%20v.%20Armenia%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-105611%22]} [rev. 24.03.2022].
  4. Chmykh, G. E., Jasutis, G., Mikova, R., Steyne, R. (2000). Legal Handbook on the Rights of Conscripts. DCAF Geneva Centre for Security Sector. https://www.dcaf.ch/legal-handbook-rights-conscripts [rev. 24.03.2022].
  5. Conscientious objection to military service. (2021). New York and Geneva: United Nations Publication.
  6. Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention on Human Rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c [rev. 24.03.2022].
  7. Dyagilev vs. Russia. (2020). Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-201649%22]} [rev. 24.03.2022].
  8. Erçep vs. Turkey. (2011). L’arrêt définitif de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. https://ebco-beoc.org/node/199 [rev. 24.03.2022].
  9. Government of Canada. (02.04.2015). DAOD 5516-2, Conscientious Objection. Defence Administrative Orders and Directives. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/defence-administrative-orders-directives/5000-series/5516/5516-2-conscientious-objection.html [rev. 24.03.2022].
  10. Human Rights of Armed Forces Personnel: Compendium of Standards. Good Practices and Recommendations. (2021). OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), Poland. https://www.osce.org/odihr/480152 [rev. 24.03.2022].
  11. Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāta Administratīvo lietu departaments. (2021). Spriedums lietā Nr. A420200818, SKA-435/2021. https://www.at.gov.lv/lv/tiesu-prakse/judikaturas-nole-mumu-arhivs/administrativo-lietu-departaments/hronologiska-seciba?lawfilter=0&year=2021 [rev. 24.03.2022].
  12. Latvijas Republikas Satversme: Latvijas Republikas likums. (1922). Latvijas Vēstnesis, Nr. 43, 01.07.1993. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/57980-latvijas-republikas-satversme [rev. 24.03.2022].
  13. Militārā dienesta likums: Latvijas Republikas likums. (2002). Latvijas Vēstnesis, Nr. 91, 18.06.2002. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/63405-militara-dienesta-likums [rev. 24.03.2022].
  14. Militar y Ser vice Act: Slovenia Law. (1991). http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO11 [rev. 24.03.2022].
  15. Mobilizācijas likums: Latvijas Republikas likums. (2002). Latvijas Vēstnesis, Nr. 91, 18.06.2002. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/63407-mobilizacijas-likums [rev. 24.03.2022].
  16. Obligātā militārā dienesta likums: Latvijas Republikas likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis, Nr. 60, 27.02.1997. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/42403#p25
  17. Papavasilakis vs. Grèce. (2016) L’arrêt définitif de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-166693%22]} [rev. 24.03.2022].
  18. Par Aizsardzības spēkiem: Latvijas Republikas likums. (1992). Latvijas Republikas Augstākās Padomes un Valdības Ziņotājs, 46/47/48, 03.12.1992. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/66546-par-aizsardzibas-spekiem [rev. 24.03.2022].
  19. Par Latvijas Republikas obligāto valsts dienestu: Latvijas Republikas likums. (1991). Latvijas Republikas Augstākās Padomes un Valdības Ziņotājs, 18/19, 03.10.1991. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/60178-par-latvijas-republikas-obligato-valsts-dienestu [rev. 24.03.2022].
  20. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights [rev. 24.03.2022].
  21. U.N. Human Rights Committee. (1993). General Comment No. 22 (48) (art. 18). CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4&Lang=en [rev. 24.03.2022].
  22. U.N. Human Rights Commitee. (2006). Consideration of reports submitted by states parties under Article 40 of the Covenant. CCPR/C/PRY/CO/2. https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/PRY/CO/2 [rev. 24.03.2022].
  23. U.N. Human Rights Commitee. (2010). Consideration of reports submitted by states parties under Article 40 of the Covenant. CCPR/C/EST/CO/3. (2010). https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2FEST%2FCO%2F3&Lang=en [rev. 24.03.2022].
  24. U.N. Human Rights Council. (2013). Twenty-fourth session resolution 24/17, Conscientious objection to military service. A/HRC/RES/24/17. Available: https://www.right-docs.org/doc/a-hrc-res-24-17/ [rev. 24.03.2022].
  25. U.N. Human Rights Council. (2019). Approaches and challenges with regard to application procedures for obtaining the status of conscientious objector to military service in accordance with human rights standards. A/HRC/41/23. Available: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3814161 [rev. 24.03.2022].
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 113
Published on: Jun 2, 2022
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2022 Vita Upeniece, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.