Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Doctrine of Lawyer’s Professional Secrecy: Nature, Standards of Protection, and Issues of Application in Civil Proceedings Cover

The Doctrine of Lawyer’s Professional Secrecy: Nature, Standards of Protection, and Issues of Application in Civil Proceedings

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Consiglio Nazionale Forense. (2014). Codice deontologico forense. From 20 June 2026, https://www.consiglionazionaleforense.it/
  2. Court of Justice of the European Union. (18 May 1982). AM & S Europe v Commission (Case 155/79). From 22 June 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61979CJ0155
  3. Court of Justice of the European Union. (26 June 2007). Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others (Case C-305/05). From 24 June 2026, infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/document?source=showPdf.jsf&docid=70192&doclang=EN
  4. Court of Justice of the European Union. (14 September 2010a). Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals v Commission (Case C-550/07). From 20 June 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62007CJ0550
  5. Court of Justice of the European Union. (6 October 2020). Privacy International (Case C-623/17). From 16 June 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0623
  6. Court of Justice of the European Union. (8 December 2022a). Orde van Vlaamse Balies, IG, Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers v Vlaamse Regering (Case C-694/20). From 13 June 2026, https://curia.europa.eu
  7. Court of Justice of the European Union. (2022b). Opinion of Advocate General Athanasios Rantos in Case C-694/20. From 24 June 2026, https://curia.europa.eu
  8. Drakšas, R. (2022). ‘Konfidencialumo principas advokato veikloje ir jo ribų neapibrėžtumas’, in Administracinės Teisės Novelos: Liber Amicorum Algimantui Urmonui, eds. E. Bilevičiūtė and G. Česnaitytė, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, pp. 301–327, Vilnius
  9. European Court of Human Rights. (16 December 1992). Niemietz v. Germany (Application No. 13710/88). From 12 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57887
  10. European Court of Human Rights. (24 July 2008). André and Others v. France (Application No. 18603/03). From 18 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87834
  11. European Court of Human Rights. (6 December 2012). Michaud v. France (Application No. 12323/11). From 20 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115377
  12. European Court of Human Rights. (2015). Sérvulo & Associados – Sociedade de Advogados, RL and Others v. Portugal. From 12 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
  13. European Court of Human Rights. (12 January 2016). Rodriguez Ravelo v. Spain (Application No. 48074/10). From 10 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-160066
  14. European Court of Human Rights. (9 April 2019a). Altay v. Turkey (No. 2) (Application No. 11236/09). From 10 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192210
  15. European Court of Human Rights. (3 December 2019b). Kırdök and Others v. Turkey (Application No. 14704/12). From 20 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199183
  16. European Court of Human Rights. (4 February 2020a). Kruglov and Others v. Russia (Application No. 11264/04 and 15 others). From 12 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200719
  17. European Court of Human Rights. (19 November 2020b). Klaus Müller v. Germany (Application No. 24173/18). From 20 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206165
  18. European Court of Human Rights. (2021). Särgava v. Estonia. From 12 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
  19. European Court of Human Rights. (2 February 2022). Vasil Vasilev v. Bulgaria (Application No. 7610/15). From 24 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213201
  20. European Court of Human Rights. (6 June 2024). Bersheda and Rybolovlev v. Monaco (Applications Nos. 36559/19 and 36570/19). From 16 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-234090
  21. European Court of Human Rights. (13 February 2025). Denysyuk and Others v. Ukraine (Applications Nos. 22790/12 and others). From 25 June 2026, https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-241747
  22. Hollander, C. (2021). Documentary Evidence, Sweet & Maxwell, London.
  23. Jansen, R. (2022). Legal Privilege and Transnational Evidence-Taking: A Comparative Study on Cross-Border Disclosure, Evidence-Shopping and Legal Privilege, Intersentia, pp. 200–210, Antwerp
  24. Maculevičienė, I. (2026). Įrodymų leistinumo ribojimų (ne) suderinamumas su teisingu civilinio ginčo išsprendimu. Teisė, 138. 97–112. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2026.138.6
  25. Newbold, A.L.E. (1990). The Crime/Fraud Exception to Legal Professional Privilege. The Modern Law Review, 53 (4). 472. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1990.tb02829.x
  26. The Bar of Brussels. (2013). Professional Secrecy of Lawyers in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 43
Published on: Sep 30, 2026
Published by: Riga Stradins University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Indrė Maculevičienė, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.