Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Subrogation and regress in Latvian insurance law: historical development of the institutes and comparison with English doctrine Cover

Subrogation and regress in Latvian insurance law: historical development of the institutes and comparison with English doctrine

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Alfejeva, J. (2023). Sauszemes transportlīdzekļu īpašnieku civiltiesiskās atbildības obligātās apdrošināšanas tiesiskie aspekti: Latvijas pieredze, Rīga: Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte.
  2. Autoru kolektīvs. (1998). Juridisko terminu vārdnīca (s.v. “Subrogācija”), Rīga: Nordik, pp. 247–248.
  3. Birds, J. (2010). Birds' Modern Insurance Law, 8th Edn., London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters.
  4. Brants, E. (2017). Regresa prasījumi Latvijas privāttiesībās. Latvijas Republikas Satversmei – 95. Latvijas Universitātes 75. zinātniskās konferences rakstu krājums. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais Apgāds, pp. 62–68.
  5. Bukovsky, V. (1914). Svod grazhdanskikh uzakoneniy guberniy Pribaltiyskikh, Riga: Tipografiia G. Gempeľ i Ko.
  6. Būmanis, A. (1933). Galvojums civiltiesībās. Doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia. https://m.juristavards.lv/biblioteka/279139-galvojums-civiltiesibas/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  7. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [German civil code] (10.08.2021, BGBl. I S. 3515). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  8. Castellain v. Preston (1883) R.E.D. 168 (Q.B.D.).
  9. Charlton v Fisher (2002) EWCA Civ 1932.
  10. Code civil [Civil code] (France, 2025). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721#/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  11. David, R., Jauffret-Spinosi, C. (2024). Translated by V.A. Tumanov, Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti, Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.
  12. Dernburg, G. (1900). Pandekty. T. 3. Obiazateľstvennoe pravo, Moskva: Universitetskaia tipografiia.
  13. Dieckmann, J.A. (2012). Normative Basis of Subrogation and Comparative Law: Select Explanations in the Common Law, Civil Law, and in Mixed Legal Systems of the Guarantor's Right to Derivative Recourse. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, 27. 49–95. https://doi.org/10.37381/zcbdqz38
  14. European Union. (2008). Regulation (EC) no. 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I). Official Journal of the European Union, L 177. 6–16. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2008/593/oj [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  15. European Union. (2007). Regulation (EC) no. 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Rome II). Official Journal of the European Union, L 199. 40–49. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/864/oj [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  16. Fillers, A. (2020). Galvinieka un ķīlas devēja regresa tiesību regulējums Latvijā civiltiesībās. Starptautisko un Eiropas Savienības tiesību piemērošana nacionālajās tiesās. Latvijas Universitātes 78. starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences rakstu krājums. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, pp. 255–261.
  17. Godeme, E. (1948). Translated by I.B. Novitskii, Obshchaia teoriia obyazateľstv, Moskva: Iurizdat.
  18. Golmsten, A. (1913). Iuridicheskie issledovaniia i staťi, Vol. 2, Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiia M.M. Stasiulevicha.
  19. Grūtups, A. (1998a). ‘Pirmā apakšnodaļa. Cesijas tiesiskais pamats’, in K. Torgāns (ed), Latvijas Republikas Civillikuma komentāri: Ceturtā daļa. Saistību tiesības, Rīga: Mans īpašums, pp. 284–288.
  20. Grūtups, A. (1998b). ‘Devītā nodaļa. Prasījumu tiesību cesija. Iepriekšējas piezīmes’, in K. Torgāns (ed), Latvijas Republikas Civillikuma komentāri: Ceturtā daļa. Saistību tiesības, Rīga: Mans īpašums, pp. 281–283.
  21. Hole v. Harrison (1675) Rept. Finch 203, 23 Eng. Rep. 111.
  22. Karapetov, A. G. (2022). Peremena lits v obyazateľstve i otvetstvennosť za narushenie obyazateľstva: Kommentariy k stateyam 330–333, 380–381, 382–406.1 GK RF. Moskva: Logos.
  23. Kārkliņš, J. (2024). Performance of debt on behalf of debtor. In Revisiting the limits of freedom while living under threat II: The 9th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. Riga: University of Latvia Press. pp. 172–182. DOI: 10.22364/iscflul.9.2.15
  24. Latvijas Republikas Civillikums [Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia]. (1937). https://likumi.lv/ta/id/90220 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  25. Latvijas Republikas Apdrošināšanas līguma likums [Insurance contract law of the Republic of Latvia]. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/299053 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  26. Latvijas Republika Sauszemes transportlīdzekļu īpašnieku civiltiesiskās atbildības obligātās apdrošināšanas likums [Compulsory civil liability insurance of owners of motor vehicles law of the Republic of Latvia]. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/87547 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  27. Latvijas Senāta Civilā kasācijas departaments. (1936). ‘Spriedums lietā Nr. 913, Finanšu ministrijas prasībā pret Joniņu’, in F. Konradi and A. Valters (eds), XIII Izvilkumi no Latvijas Senāta Civīlā kasācijas departamenta spriedumiem (Nr. 1), Rīga: Tieslietu ministrijas izdevums, pp. 216–218.
  28. Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Civillietu tiesu palāta [The Senate of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia, Department of Civil Cases]. (2016, March 8). Spriedums civillietā Nr. C04413711, PAC–0073/2016. https://manas.tiesas.lv/eTiesasMvc/nolemumi/pdf/266758.pdf [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  29. Latvijas Republikas likums Par apdrošināšanas līgumu [Law on the insurance contract of the Latvian Republic]. (1998/2018), https://likumi.lv/ta/id/48896-par-apdrosinasanas-ligumu [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  30. Leisegang, B. (1993). The Renunciation of Legal Benefits. Juta's Business Law, 1 (1). 38–39. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jutbusil1&i=38 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  31. Lord Napier and Ettrick v. Hunter (1993) A.C. 713.
  32. Lowry, J., Rawlings, P. (1999). ‘Subrogation and abandonment’, in Insurance Law: Doctrines and Principles, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 199–220.
  33. Magna Carta of Edward I. (1297). 25 Edw. 1, art. 9. Quoted in Howard, A. E. D. (1998). Magna Carta: Text & commentary (rev. ed.). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  34. Mantrovs, V. (2016). Regresa prasības regulējums Latvijas apdrošināšanas tiesībās, Ārvalsts investīcijas: Kad tiesības mijiedarbojas: Latvijas Universitātes 74. zinātniskās konferences rakstu krājums. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds. pp. 408–419
  35. Marasinghe, M.L. (1975). An Historical Introduction to the Doctrine Of Subrogation: The Early History of the Doctrine I. Valparaiso University Law Review, 10 (1). 45–65. https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol10/iss1/3 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  36. Marasinghe, M.L. (1976). An Historical Introduction to the Doctrine of Subrogation: The Early History of the Doctrine II. Valparaiso University Law Review, 10 (2). 275–299. https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol10/iss2/4/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  37. Mason v Sainsbury (1782) 3 Dougl 61 at 65, per Buller J.
  38. Meier, S. (2012). ‘Subrogation’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://max-eup2012.mpipriv.de/index.php/Subrogation [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  39. Mitchell, C. (1993). The Law of Subrogation. PhD diss., University College London, 1993. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10102572 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  40. Napier Ettrick v. Kershaw Ltd (1993) 1 Lloyd's Rep. 197.
  41. Page v Scottish Insurance Corporation (1929)140 LT 571.
  42. Petrofina (UK) Ltd v Magnaload Ltd (1984) QB 127.
  43. Podosinov, A.V., Kozlova, G.G., Glukhov, A.A. (2001). Lingua Latina. Latinsko-russkii slovar', Moskva: Flinta.
  44. Pothier, R.J. (1806). in Translated by W.D. Evans, A Treatise on the Law of Obligations, or Contracts, London: Strahan.
  45. Study Group on a European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group). (2008). Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Interim Outline Edition. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers.
  46. Prokofyev, A.S. (2012). Pravovoe regulirovanie ustupki trebovanii v Anglii i SShA. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodateľstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniia/Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 3. 133–138. https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61329 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  47. Randal v. Cockran (1748) 1 Ves. Sen. 98, 27 Eng. Rep. 916.
  48. Rayner v Preston (1881) 18 Ch D 1.
  49. Rone, D. (2019). Subrogācija un regresa tiesības apdrošināšanā. XIX Turība University Conference. Human Values in the Digital Age. Riga: Turība University, pp. 140–147.
  50. Scott, S.P., trans. (1932). ‘The enactments of Justinian: The Novels. IV concerning sureties, mandators, bondsmen and payments’, in The Civil Law, Including the Twelve Tables, the Institutes of Gaius, the Rules of Ulpian, the Opinions of Paulus, the Enactments of Justinian, and the Constitutions of Leo. Cincinnati: Central Trust Company. https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Anglica/N4_Scott.html [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  51. Shirvindt, A.M. (2006). ‘Beneficium cedendarum actionum v sovremennom kontekste’, in Rimskoe chastnoe i publichnoe pravo: mnogovekovoi opyt razvitiia evropeiskogo prava. Materialy zasedanii IV Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii Moskva–Ivanovo–Suzdal, Ivanovo: Izdateľstvo Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, pp. 237–243.
  52. Simpson v Thomson, Birrell (1877) 3 App Cas 279.
  53. Sinaiskiy, V. (1926). Osnovy grazhdanskogo prava. V sviazi s chasťyu III Svoda uzakoneniy, deystvuyushchikh v Latvii i Estonii, Vol. II, Riga: Izdateľstvo akts. o-va Riga: Valters i Rapa.
  54. Sinaiskiy, V. (1917). Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo, Kiev: Tipolitografiia «Progressa», p. 99.
  55. Swain v Wall (1641) 1 Chan. Rep. 149, 21 Eng. Rep. 537.
  56. The Quebec Fire Assurance Company v. Augustin St. Louis and John Molson (United Kingdom) (1851) UKPC 1.
  57. Torgāns, K. (2014). Saistibu tiesibas. Mācību grāmata, Rīga: Tiesu namu aģentūra.
  58. Torgāns, K. (1996). Civillikums: 4. d. Saistību tiesības un komentāri pie Civillikuma Saistību tiesību daļas nodaļām, Rīga: Mans Īpašums.
  59. Torgāns, K. (2007). Civillikuma Saistību tiesību daļas modernizācijas nepieciešamība un aktuālo privāttiesiskā regulējuma tendenču (UNIDROIT, ELTP) iespējamā ietekme uz Civillikuma Saistību tiesību daļas modernizāciju. Latvijas Republikas Augstākā tiesa. https://ppdb.mk.gov.lv/database/civillikuma-saistibu-tiesibudalas-modernizacijas-nepieciesamiba-un-aktualo-privattiesiskaregulejuma-tendencu-unidroit-eltp-iespejama-ietekme-uz-civillikuma-saistibu-tiesibu-dalas-modernizaciju-2/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  60. Trepitsyn, I. (1914). Grazhdanskoe pravo gubernii Tsarstva Poľskago i russkoe v svyazi s Proektom grazhdanskogo ulozheniya. Obshchaya chasť obyazateľstvennogo prava, Varshava: Tipografiia Varshavskogo uchebnogo okruga.
  61. Tyco Fire v. Rolls Royce Motor Cars (2008) EWCA Civ 286. https://vlex.co.uk/vid/tyco-fire-v-rolls-794053661 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  62. United Kingdom. (1906). The Marine Insurance Act 1906. from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  63. United Kingdom. (1856). Mercantile Law Amendment Act 1856. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/19-20/97/enacted [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  64. United Kingdom. (1988). The Road Traffic Act 1988. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/contents [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  65. Versicherungsvertragsgesetz [Insurance Contract Act 2008] (22 February 2023, BGBl. 2023 I Nr. 51). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_vvg/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  66. Vietējo Civillikumu Kopojums. (1928). III. daļa [Private law of the Baltic Provinces]. https://likumavara.lv/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Vietejo-civillikumu-kopojums.III_.dala_0.1928.g.pdf [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  67. Vīnzarājs, N. (1932). Jautājumā par piespiestu cesiju. Jurists, Nr. 9, pp. 245–256. https://periodika.lndb.lv/periodika2-viewer/?lang=fr#issue:801594 [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  68. Whittaker, S. (2000). Performance of Another's Obligation: French and English Law Contrasted, Oxford: Oxford University Comparative Law Forum, p. 7. http://ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  69. Wickert, G. L. (n.d.). The societal benefits of subrogation. MWL Law. Accessed May 27, 2026. https://www.mwl-law.com/helpful-resources/defending-subrogation/ [Accessed 27 May 2026].
  70. Zimmermann, R. (2012). ‘Suretyship’, in The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Online ed.), Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.003.0005
Language: English
Page range: 62 - 72
Published on: Jul 14, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Renāts Budilovičs, published by Riga Stradins University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.