Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Technology Transfer Steps Towards the Commercialization of Research Results for Universities Cover

Technology Transfer Steps Towards the Commercialization of Research Results for Universities

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Al-Tabbaa, O., & Ankrah, S. (2016). Social capital to facilitate “engineered” university-industry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.02710.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.027
  2. Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.00510.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
  3. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34(7), 1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.00910.1016/j.respol.2005.05.009
  4. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2005). The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behaviour: Demographics or Opportunities? (No. 11348; NBER Working Paper, Vol. 1).10.3386/w11348
  5. Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. L. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76–77, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.00310.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.003
  6. Beath, J., Owen, R. F., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Ulph, D. (2003). Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1301–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00084-510.1016/S0167-7187(03)00084-5
  7. Belitski, M., Aginskaja, A., & Marozau, R. (2019). Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding? Research Policy, 48(3), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.01110.1016/j.respol.2018.10.011
  8. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.00810.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
  9. Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., Link, A. N., Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2015). Concise Guide to Entrepreneurship, Technology and Innovation. In D. B. Audretsch, C. S. Hayter, & A. N. Link (Eds.), Concise Guide to Entrepreneurship, Technology and Innovation (Issue June). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/978178347420210.4337/9781783474202
  10. Caldera, A., & Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.01610.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
  11. Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A.-C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1–2), 199–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-002-0105-010.1007/s00191-002-0105-0
  12. Cesaroni, F., Conti, G., & Piccaluga, A. (2005). Technology Transfer Offices (TTO) in Italian.
  13. Chang, Y. C., Chen, M. H., Hua, M., & Yang, P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a “scientific-economic” framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.00410.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004
  14. Condom, P., Ignasi, C., Alberto, O., Roger, P., Jose Maria, E., & Villà. (2008). From Research to Market: Key Issues of Technology Transfer from Public Research Centres to Businesses.
  15. Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.00310.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
  16. Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102167461865810.1023/A:1021674618658
  17. Good, M., Knockaert, M., Soppe, B., & Wright, M. (2019). The technology transfer ecosystem in academia. An organizational design perspective. In Technovation (Vols. 82–83, pp. 35–50). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.00910.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.009
  18. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.00510.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005
  19. Hellmann, T. (2005). The Role of Patents for Bridging the Science to Market Gap.10.3386/w11460
  20. Monika Boguszewicz-Kreft, Athanasios Arvanitis, Kostas Karatzas, Gilda Antonelli, Biagio Simonetti https://doi.org/10.3386/w1146010.3386/w11460
  21. Hockaday, T. (2014). Spin-out versus Licence. What are the differences between a Spin-out and a Licence in university technology transfer? How do you decide which to do? Oxford University Innovation, October.
  22. Horner, S., Jayawarna, D., Giordano, B., & Jones, O. (2019). Strategic choice in universities: Managerial agency and effective technology transfer. Research Policy, 48(5), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.01510.1016/j.respol.2019.01.015
  23. Hoye, K., & Pries, F. (2009). ‘Repeat commercializers,’ the ‘habitual entrepreneurs’ of university–industry technology transfer. Technovation, 29(10), 682–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.00810.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.008
  24. Hsu, D. H., & Berstein, T. (1997). Managing the university technology licensing process. Findings and case studies. Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 9, 1–33.
  25. Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y. C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.00210.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.002
  26. Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2004). Patent Licensing and the Research University. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1075810.3386/w10758
  27. Kneller, R. (2001). Technology transfer: A review for biomedical researchers. In Clinical Cancer Research.
  28. Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1162/15424760432306796110.1162/154247604323067961
  29. Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00020.x
  30. Łobacz, K. (2018). Knowledge transfer at universities: can technology transfer offices, business incubators and science and technology parks in Poland provide good support services? European Journal of Service Management, 28, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.18276/ejsm.2018.28/1-2310.18276/ejsm.2018.28/1-23
  31. MIT TLO. (2020). Learn About Intellectual Property. MIT TLO Technology Licensing Office. http://tlo.mit.edu/learn-about-intellectual-property/technology-transfer-process,
  32. O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.01110.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
  33. Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic Capitalism and University Incentives for Faculty Entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x
  34. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2014). Articulating the “three-missions” in Spanish universities. Research Policy, 43(10), 1760–1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.00110.1016/j.respol.2014.06.001
  35. Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101111020788510.1023/A:1011110207885
  36. Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. S. (2017a). University research and knowledge transfer: A dynamic view of ambidexterity in british universities. Research Policy, 46(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.00810.1016/j.respol.2017.03.008
  37. Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. S. (2017b). Choice of Structure, Business Model and Portfolio: Organizational Models of Knowledge Transfer Offices in British Universities. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.1222410.1111/1467-8551.12224
  38. Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/grm03610.1093/icb/grm036
  39. Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic Entrepreneurship: Time for a Rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.1211610.1111/1467-8551.12116
  40. Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm01510.1093/icc/dtm015
  41. Smith, C. D. (2011). Your idea and your university: Issues in academic technology transfer. Journal of Investigative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e31820d0fdf10.2310/JIM.0b013e31820d0fdf
  42. Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-810.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8
  43. Thursby, M., Thursby, J., & Gupta-Mukherjee, S. (2007). Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.01610.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.016
  44. Van Norman, G. A., & Eisenkot, R. (2017a). Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 1: Intellectual Property Rights—Basics of Patents and Copyrights. JACC: Basic to Translational Science, 2(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.01.00310.1016/j.jacbts.2017.01.003
  45. Van Norman, G. A., & Eisenkot, R. (2017b). Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process. JACC: Basic to Translational Science, 2(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.00410.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.004
  46. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.4250050207/abstract10.1002/smj.4250050207
Language: English
Page range: 26 - 39
Published on: Dec 22, 2021
Published by: WSB Merito University in Gdansk
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Monika Boguszewicz-Kreft, Athanasios Arvanitis, Kostas Karatzas, Gilda Antonelli, Biagio Simonetti, published by WSB Merito University in Gdansk
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.