Technological models of development and their applicability to a Baltic states

Chaplygin, Vladimir

doi:10.2478/wsbjbf-2019-0019

Abstract

Purpose – To study the possibilities of a theory to establish a modern theory of economic growth, including the factors of institutions and changes in technologies. These factors are a set of rules with high coercive force to the agents’ action, which form a particular mode/model of their adaptation, together with other institutions.

Findings – The research results may enrich an economic theory and practice in the area of business models applicability in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. The findings may assist an economic community to influence the general technological development within the national institutional systems.

Practical implications –The so-called institutional macroeconomics as a practical discipline (which has a very close connection with behavioural macroeconomics) may assist to explore the economic growth in a Baltic States from the point of view of changing institutions (firms, business community), labour markets and information.

References

Aghion, P., & Howitt, A. (1992). Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351. https://doi.org/10.2307/295159910.2307/2951599
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aguirre, A. (2017). Contracting institutions and economic growth. Review of Economic Dynamics, 24, 192-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2017.01.00910.1016/j.red.2017.01.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alonso-Carrera, J., & Raurich, X. (2018). Labor mobility, structural change and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 56, 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.03.00210.1016/j.jmacro.2018.03.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Balachandran, B., &Williams, B. (2018). Effective governance, financial markets, financial institutions & crises. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 50, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.07.00610.1016/j.pacfin.2018.07.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bartolini, D., & Santolini, R. (2017). Political institutions behind good governance. Economic Systems, 41(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.05.00410.1016/j.ecosys.2016.05.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baumol, W. (2004). Red-Queen games: arm races, rule of law and market economies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0207-y10.1007/s00191-004-0207-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blaug, M. (1994). Economic Thought in retrospective review. Moscow: Business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brancaccio, E., Garbellini, N., & Giammetti, R. (2018). Structural labour market reforms, GDP growth and the functional distribution of income. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 44, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.09.00110.1016/j.strueco.2017.09.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cantner, U., &Hanusch, H. (2002). Evolutionary economics, its basic concepts and methods. A tribute to Mark Perlman, Editor of the Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1991-96.In H. Lim, U.K. Park, & G.C. Harcourt (Eds.), Editing Economics. Essays in honor of Mark Perlman (pp. 182-207).London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020347220010.4324/9780203472200
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coase, R. (1993). The firm. The market. The law. Мoscow: Business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coase, R. (2000). Interview at the Founding Conference of International Society of New Institutional Economy. St. Louis, 1997 September 17^th. Quarterly Bulletin of Economists Club, 4, 1-28.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Felice, G. (2016). Size and composition of public investment, sectoral composition and growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 44, 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.07.00110.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.07.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gabardo, F. A., Pereima, J. B., & Einloft, P. (2017).The incorporation of structural change into growth theory: A historical appraisal. Economia, 18(3), 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2017.05.00310.1016/j.econ.2017.05.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hartwell, C. A. (2016). The institutional basis of efficiency in resource-rich countries. Economic Systems, 40(4), 519-538.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.02.00410.1016/j.ecosys.2016.02.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helpman, E. (2011). The mystery of economic growth. Moscow: Publishing House of E.T. Gaidar Institute.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodgson, J. (2003). Economic theory and institutions. Moscow: Business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hodgson, J. (2006). Evolutionary and Institutional Economy as New «Mainstream»? Economic Bulletin of Rostov State University, 6(2), 8-21.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Homan, P. (1932). An appraisal of institutional economics. American Economic Review, 22(1), 10-17. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1807255
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Iamsiraroj, S. (2016). The foreign direct investment – economic growth nexus. International Review of Economics & Finance, 42, 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.10.04410.1016/j.iref.2015.10.044
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lucas, R. (1981). Studies in business-cycle theory. MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menard, C. (1996). Economy of organizations. Translation from French. Moscow: Infra-M.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nelson, R. (2008). Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360081070184803710.1080/13600810701848037
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2000). Evolutional theory of economic changes. Moscow: Finstatinform.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
North, D. (2010). Understanding of the process of economic changes. Moscow: Publishing house GU Higher School of Economics.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Olson, M. (2013). Eminence and decline of the nations. Economic growth, stagflation and social sclerosis. Moscow: New Publishing house.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryser, L., Halseth, G., Markey, S., &Morris, M. (2016).The structural underpinnings impacting rapid growth in resource regions. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(3), 616-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.06.00110.1016/j.exis.2016.06.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Samaniego, R. M., &Sun, J. Y. (2016).Productivity growth and structural transformation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 21, 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2015.06.00310.1016/j.red.2015.06.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Silverberg, G., & Verspagen, B. (1995). Evolutionary theorizing on economic growth. Discussion paper. MERIT, Maastricht.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Solow, R. (1994). Perspectives of the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.4510.1257/jep.8.1.45
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Solow, R. M. (1957).Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3),312-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/192604710.2307/1926047
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Solow, R. M. (1974).The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_1310.1057/9780230523210_13
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Solow, R. M.(2007).The last 50 years in growth theory and the next 10. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm00410.1093/oxrep/grm004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veblen, T. (1980). The theory of idle class. Moscow: Progress.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Veblen, T. (2007). The theory of the business enterprise. Moscow: Business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vo, L. V., &Le, H. T. T. (2017).Strategic growth option, uncertainty, and R&D investment. International Review of Financial Analysis, 51, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.03.00210.1016/j.irfa.2017.03.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. N.Y.: Prentice-Hall.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang, H., &Jung, W.-S. (2016). Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.01210.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Technological models of development and their applicability to a Baltic states

Abstract

Paradigm

My account