Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A matter of Motivation - The Effects of Risk Preference and Task Complexity on the Auditor’s Motivation Cover

A matter of Motivation - The Effects of Risk Preference and Task Complexity on the Auditor’s Motivation

Open Access
|Nov 2019

References

  1. Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J. A. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2000). The art of writing a scientific article. Journal of Science Communication, 163, 51–59.
  2. Strunk, W., Jr., & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan.
  3. Mettam, G. R., & Adams, L. B. (1999). How to prepare an electronic version of your article. In B. S. Jones & R. Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the electronic age (pp. 281–304). New York: E-Publishing Inc.
  4. Fachinger, J., den Exter, M., Grambow, B., Holgerson, S., Landesmann, C., Titov, M., et al. (2004). Behavior of spent HTR fuel elements in aquatic phases of repository host rock formations, 2nd International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology. Beijing, China, paper #B08.
  5. Fachinger, J. (2006). Behavior of HTR fuel elements in aquatic phases of repository host rock formations. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 236, 54.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.11.023
  6. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
  7. Amir, E., Kallunki, J.-P., & Nilsson, H. (2014). The association between individual audit partners’ risk preferences and the composition of their client portfolios. Review of Accounting Studies, 19/1, 103-133.10.1007/s11142-013-9245-8
  8. Ashton, R. & Kramer, S. (1980). Students as Surrogates in Behavioural Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Research, 1–15.10.2307/2490389
  9. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64/6(1), 359-372.10.1037/h0043445
  10. Bigus, J. (2007). Die Sorgfaltsanreize des Wirtschaftsprüfers bei beschränkter Haftung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Vol. 59 No.1, pp. 61-86.10.1007/BF03372781
  11. Bigus, J. (2011). Auditors’ liability with overcompensation and reputation losses. OR Spectrum, 33/2, 287-307.10.1007/s00291-011-0240-9
  12. Bonner, S. (1994). A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 213–234.10.1016/0361-3682(94)90033-7
  13. Bonner, S. (2008). Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall;, N.J.
  14. Bonner, S. & Sprinkle, G. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance - theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27/4-5, 303–345.10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
  15. Bowrin, A. R. & King, J. (2010). Time pressure, task complexity, and audit effectiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25 (2), 160-181.10.1108/02686901011008963
  16. Campbell, D. (1988). Task Complexity - A Review and Analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.10.2307/258353
  17. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174794
  18. Chan, S. H. (2005). A motivational framework for understanding IS use and decision performance. Review of Business Information Systems, 9/4, 101-117.10.19030/rbis.v9i4.4446
  19. Chan, S. H., Qian S. & Lee J. Y. (2014). The Impact of Task Complexity, Task Motivation, Decision Support System (DSS) Motivation, and DSS Use on Performance. PACIS (2014).
  20. Chan, S. & Song, Q. (2010). Motivational Framework: Insights into Decision Support System Use and Decision Performance. In: M. Cioca & L.-I. Cioca (Eds.), Decision Support Systems used in Disaster Management. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
  21. Chan, S., Song, Q. & Yao, L. (2014). The Impact of Task Complexity, Task Motivation, Decision Support System (DSS) Motivation, and DSS Use on Judgment Performance. PACIS 2014 Proceedings, 292.
  22. Chung, J. & Monroe, G. (2001). A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 111–125.10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
  23. DeFond, M. L. & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 58/2/3, 275–326.10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
  24. DeZoort, T., Harrison, P. & Taylor, M. (2006). Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: The effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31/4, 373–390.10.1016/j.aos.2005.09.001
  25. Dusenbury, R., Reimers, J. & Wheeler, S. (2000). The audit risk model: An empirical test for conditional dependencies among assessed component risks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(2),105-117.10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.105
  26. Dye, R. (1995). Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting & Economics 19, 75–114.10.1016/0165-4101(94)00375-F
  27. Eccles, J. S. P. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the Mind of the Actor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225.10.1177/0146167295213003
  28. Eccles, J.S.P. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  29. Eccles, J. S. P., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In: J. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and Achievement Motives, New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 75-146.
  30. Eysenck, M. (1986). A Handbook of Cognitive Psychology, London: Erlbaum.
  31. Farmer, T. A. (1993). Testing the Effect of Risk Attitude on Auditor Judgment Using Multiattribute Utility Theory. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 8(1), 91–110.10.1177/0148558X9300800106
  32. Fatemi, D. J. (2012). An Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Audit Fee Structure and Auditor Selection Rights on Auditor Independence and Client Investment Decisions. Auditing a Journal of Practice and Theory, 31(3), 75-94.10.2308/ajpt-10289
  33. Fisher, C.W., Chengalur-Smith, I. & Ballou, D.P. (2003). The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 170-188.10.1287/isre.14.2.170.16017
  34. Funke, J. (1991). Solving complex problems: Exploration and control of complex systems. In: R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 185-222). Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 185-222.
  35. Gill, T. G. & Hicks, R. C. (2006). Task Complexity and Informing Science: A Synthesis. Informing Science, 1–30.10.28945/3045
  36. Gronewold, U. (2006). Die Beweiskraft von Beweisen: Audit Evidence bei betriebswirtschaftlichen Prüfungen. Düsseldorf: IDW Verlag.
  37. Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  38. Hadrdies, K., Breesch, D. & Branson, J. (2013). Gender differences in overconfidence and risk taking: Do self-selection and socialization matter?. Economic Letters, 118(3), 442-444.10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.004
  39. Hidi, S. & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2001). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-180.10.3102/00346543070002151
  40. Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods, Wiley-Interscience.
  41. Holt, C. & Laury, S. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentives Effects. American Economic Review 92, 1644-1655.10.1257/000282802762024700
  42. Humphrey, M. & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, Motivation, and Performance - A Theory of the Relationship between Individual Differences and Information Processing. Psychological Review, 153–184.10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153
  43. Jacko, J.A. & Salvendi, G. (1996). Hierarchical menu design: Breadth, depth and task complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1187-1201.10.2466/pms.1996.82.3c.1187
  44. Johnstone, K. M. (2000). Client-Acceptance Decisions: Simultaneous Effects of Client Business Risk, Audit Risk, Auditor Business Risk, and Risk Adaptation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 1–25.10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.1
  45. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  46. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In: M. Dunnette, & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 57 – 170), Paolo Alto: Consulting Psychology Press.
  47. Klein, R. & Scholl, A. (2004). Planung und Entscheidung: Konzepte, Modelle und Methoden einer modernen betriebswirtschaftlichen Entscheidungsanalyse. München: Vahlen.
  48. Klemz, B.R. & Gruca, T.S. (2003). Dueling or the battle royale? The impact of task complexity on the evaluation of entry threat. Psychology & Marketing, 20(11), 999-1016.10.1002/mar.10106
  49. Klersey, G.F. & Roberts, M.L (2010). Audit partners’ individual risk preferences in client retention decisions. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 14(2), 115-129.
  50. Laux, H., Gillenkirch, R. & Schenk-Mathes, M. (2014). Entscheidungstheorie. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-55258-8
  51. Lawler, E. (1994). Motivation in Work Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  52. Lehtinen, A. & Kvist, L. (2018). Gender, Independence and Risk Preference: A quantitative study of listed Swedish companies. Umea University: Independent Thesis.
  53. Mala, R. & Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 14, 1–50.10.1111/1911-3838.12040
  54. McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand Company Inc.10.1037/14359-000
  55. Miller, C., Fedor, D. & Ramsay, R. (2006). Effects of Discussion of Audit Reviews on Au-ditors’ Motivation and Performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18, 135–146.10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.135
  56. Mohd Iskandar, T., Nelly Sari, R., Mohd-Sanusi, Z. & Anugerah, R. (2012). Enhancing audi-tors’ performance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(5), 462–476.10.1108/02686901211227959
  57. Mohd-Sanusi, Z. & Mohd-Iskandar, T. (2007). Audit judgment performance: Assessing the effect of performance incentives, effort and task complexity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22, 34–52.10.1108/02686900710715639
  58. Mohd-Sanusi, Z., Mohd-Iskandar, T. & Poon, J. (2007). Effects of goal orientation and task complexity on audit judgment performance. Malaysian Accounting Review, 6, 123-139.
  59. Nelson, M. & Tan, H. (2005). Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Supplement 2005, 24, 41-71.10.2308/aud.2005.24.Supplement.41
  60. O’Donnell, E. & Johnson, E. N. (2001). The Effects of Auditor Gender and Task Complexity on Information Processing Efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 5(2), 91–105.10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00328.x
  61. Pablo, A, Sitkin, S. & Jemison, D. (1996). Acquisition Decision-Making Processes: The Central Role of Risk. Journal of Management, 22, 723-746.10.1177/014920639602200503
  62. Pintrich, P. R. & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  63. Pintrich, P. R. & Schrauben, B., (1992). Student perceptions in the classroom. In: D.H. Schunk, & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  64. Prawitt, D. (1995). Staffing Assignments for Judgment-Oriented Audit Tasks: The Effects of Structured Audit Technology and Environment. The Accounting Review, 443–465.
  65. Pummerer, E., Steller, M. & Baldauf, J. (2013). Prüfungsqualität, Prüferhaftung und Risiko-aversion: Eine analytische Betrachtung der Bedeutung der Risikoaversion für die Prüfungsqualität. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 1, 32–59.10.1007/BF03373708
  66. Quick, R. (2005). Unabhängigkeit des Abschlussprüfers im Spiegel der Wissenschaft. In: A. Haller (Eds.). Wirtschaftsprüfung und Corporate Governance in Österreich (pp. 91-143), Wien: Linde.
  67. Reynaud, A. & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measure: results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, Vol. 73 No. 2, pp. 203-221.10.1007/s11238-012-9296-5
  68. Rheinberg, F. (2010). Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation und Handeln (pp. 365-387), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-12693-2_14
  69. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). When rewards compete with nature - The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In: C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance (pp. 257-307), San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50024-6
  70. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R. & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence – When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185–205.10.1007/BF00995170
  71. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific studies of reading, 3(3), 257-279.10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_4
  72. Schwind, J. (2011). Die Informationsverarbeitung von Wirtschaftsprüfern bei der Prüfung geschätzter Werte: Eine verhaltenswissenschaftliche und empirische Analyse, Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.10.1007/978-3-8349-6225-6
  73. Simunic, D. & Stein, M. (1996). Impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 119–134.
  74. Sitkin, S. B. & Weingart, L. R. (1992). Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Prospensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(69, 1573-1592.10.2307/256844
  75. Stone, D. N. & Kadous, K. (1997). The joint effects of task-related negative affect and task difficulty in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 159-174.10.1006/obhd.1997.2703
  76. Tan, H.-T. & Kao, A. (1999). Accountability Effects on Auditors’ Performance - The Influence of Knowledge, Problem-Solving Ability, and Task Complexity. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(19), 209–223.10.2307/2491404
  77. Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment - An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
  78. Touré-Tillery, M. & Fishbach, A. (2014). How to measure Motivation: A Guide for the Experimental Social Psychologist. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 328-341.10.1111/spc3.12110
  79. Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state - A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170-182.10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4
  80. Wagenhofer, A. & Ewert, R. (2007). Externe Unternehmensrechnung. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
  81. Weber, E., Blais, A. & Betz, N. (2002). A Domain-specific Risk-attitude Scale, in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290.10.1002/bdm.414
  82. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. P. (1992). The development of achievement task values - a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
  83. Zuber, M. & Guthier, M. (2003). Verfahren zur Erhebung der Risikoeinstellung in der Kapitalanlageberatung. Jahrbuch der Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung, 49/4.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 14
Published on: Nov 15, 2019
Published by: WSB Merito University in Gdansk
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Marco Haid, Sabine Graschitz, Peter Heimerl, published by WSB Merito University in Gdansk
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.