References
- Aust HP, ‘Klimaschutz aus Karlsruhe: Was verlangt der Beschluss vom Gesetzgeber?’ (2021/5/05) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/klimaschutz-aus-karlsruhe-was-verlangt-das-urteil-vom-gesetzgeber/.
- Beckerman W and Pasek J, Justice, Posterity, and the Environment (Oxford University Press 2002).
- Beckerman W, ‘Intergenerational Justice’ (2004) 2 (2) Intergenerational Justice Review 1–5.
- Buser A, ‘Die Freiheit der Zukunft: Zum Klima-Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (2021/4/30) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/die-freiheit-der-zukunft/.
- Cox R, ‘A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands’ (2016) 34 (2) Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 143–163.
- Eckes C, ‘Separation of Powers in Climate Cases: Comparing cases in Germany and the Netherlands’ (2021/5/10) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/separation-of-powers-in-climate-cases/.
- Ekardt F, ‘Climate Revolution with Weaknesses’ (2021/5/08) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/climate-revolution-with-weaknesses/.
- Gelinsky K and Fuchs M-C, ‘Bitte noch mehr: Rechtsprechungsdialog im Karlsruher Klimabeschluss‘ (2021/5/26) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/bitte-noch-mehr/.
- Goldmann M, ‘Judges for Future: The Climate Action Judgment as a Postcolonial Turn in Constitutional Law?’ (2021/4/30) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/judges-for-future/.
- Gosseries A, ‘On Future Generations’ Future Rights’ (2008) 16 (4) The Journal of Political Philosophy 446–474.
- Láncos PL, ‘Flexibility and Legitimacy: The Emissions Trading System under the Kyoto Protocol’ in Armin Bogdandy et al. (eds.) The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law (Springer 2010) 271–299.
- Láncos PL, ‘Passivist Strategies Available to the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2019) 79 (4) Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 971–993.
- Leijten I, ‘Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case’ (2019) 37 (2) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 112–118.
- Minnerop P, ‘The ‘Advance Interference-Like Effect’ of Climate Targets: Fundamental Rights, Intergenerational Equity and the German Federal Constitutional Court’ (2022) 34 (1) Journal of Environmental Law 135–162.
- O Neill S and Alblas E, ‘Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland’ in Robbins David, Torney Diarmuid and Brereton Pat (eds), Ireland and the Climate Crisis. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication (Palgrave Macmillan 2020) 57–72.
- Rath K and Benner M, ‘Ein Grundrecht auf Generationengerechtigkeit? Die Relevanz des Klimaschutz-Beschlusses des Bundesverfassungsgerichts für andere Rechtsgebiete mit intergenerationaler Bedeutung’ (2021/5/07) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/ein-grundrecht-auf-generationengerechtigkeit/.
- Saiger A-J, ‘The Constitution Speaks in the Future Tense: On the Constitutional Complaints Against the Federal Climate Change Act’ (2021/4/29) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/the-constitution-speaks-in-the-future-tense/.
- Steinbeis M, ‘Ok, Boomer’ (2021/4/30) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/ok-boomer/.
- Stohlmann B, ‘Keine Schutzpflicht vor zukünftigen Freiheitsbeschränkungen – warum eigentlich?’ (2021/5/04) VerfBlog https://verfassungsblog.de/keine-schutzpflicht-vor-zukunftigen-freiheitsbeschrankungen-warum-eigentlich/.
- Sulyok K, ‘A klímaperek kihívásai és sikerei’ (2020) 13 (1) Közjogi Szemle 1–7.
- Sulyok K, Science and Judicial Reasoning: The Legitimacy of International Environmental Adjudication (Cambridge University Press 2020).
- Szabó M, ‘Az egészséges környezethez való jog anyagi jogi és eljárásjogi kérdései az Alkotmánybíróság újabb gyakorlatában’ (2022) 10 (2) Acta Humana 77–92.
- Szemesi S, ‘From Non-Derogation to the Duty to Progress. Key Elements of the Right to a Healthy Environment in the Case Law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’ (2023) 11 (1) Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 335–348.
- UNEP (2022) ‘The Closing Window: Climate crisis calls for rapid transformation of societies.’ ISBN: 978-92-807-3979-4
- Wewerinke-Singh M and McCoach A, ‘The State of the Netherlands v Urgenda Foundation: Distilling best practice and lessons learnt for future rights-based climate litigation’ Review of European’ (2021) 30 (2) Comparative & International Environmental Law 275–283.