Implementation of EU Acts in the Czech Parliament: A Slow and Laborious Quest with an Uncertain Outcome

Michal Říha

doi:10.2478/wrlae-2022-0027

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Implementation of EU Acts in the Czech Parliament: A Slow and Laborious Quest with an Uncertain Outcome

Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics

Volume 14 (2024): Issue 1 (December 2024)

By: Michal Říha

Open Access

|Oct 2024

Abstract

The article focuses on the statutory implementation practice of EU legislation in the Czech Republic based on statistical evidence. The main focus is a comparison of the length of the legislative procedure in the Parliament from 2010–2021, i.e. three election periods of the Chamber of Deputies, which is the dominant body of law-making in the Czech Republic. In conclusion, the author describes an unusually lengthy implementation process and analyses possible reasons for one of the worst transposition-on-time results within the EU. However, he refutes the claim that the transposition deficit is mostly caused by the Parliament.

References

Constitutional Court ruling no. Pl. ÚS 55/10, 80/2011 Coll.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Court of Justice ruling no. C-74/91 Commission v Germany
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Court of Justice ruling no. C-482/17 Czech Republic v Parliament and Council.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Act on Chamber of Deputies rules of Procedure no. 90/1995 Coll., as amended.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Annex to the Government Decision no. 432 of 16th July 1997 as amended.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Annex to the Government Decision no. 1304 of 12th October 2005 as amended.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Directive (EU) 2017/853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Council Directive 91/477/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chamber of Deputies bill no. 19 in the 8^th election period.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chamber of Deputies bill no. 92 in the 8^th election period.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chamber of Deputies bill no. 138 in the 8^th election period.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baratta, R. ‘Complexity of EU Law in the Domestic Implementing Process’ (2014) 2(3) Theory and Practice of Legislation.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Börzel, T. A. Why Noncompliance: The Politics of Law in the European Union (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2021).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Börzel, T. A. and F. Schimmelfennig. ‘Coming together or drifting apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe’ (2017) 24(2) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Börzel, T. A. and U. Sedelmeier. ‘Larger and more law abiding? The impact of enlargement on compliance in the European Union’ (2017) 24(2) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Börzel, T. A., T. Hofmann, and D. Panke. ‘Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union’ (2012) 16(4) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Börzel, T. A., T. Hofmann, D. Panke, and C. Sprungk. ‘Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply With European Law’ (2010) 43(11) Comparative Political Studies.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Falkner, G. and O. Treib. ‘Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States’ (2008) 46(2) JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fromage, D. (ed.) Executive–Legislative (Im)balance in the European Union (Hart Publishing, 2020).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaeding, M. ‘Determinants of Transposition Delay in the European Union’ (2006) 26(3) Journal of Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karlas, J. ‘Parliamentary control of EU affairs in Central and Eastern Europe: explaining the variation’ (2011) 18(2) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kelemen, D. and T. Pavone. ‘Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and the Politics of Supranational Forbearance in the European Union’ SSRN Electronic Journal.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Král, R. Směrnice EU z pohledu jejich transpozice a vnitrostátních účinků (1st edn, C.H. Beck, Prague 2014).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Král, R. ‘On the Gold-Plating in the Czech transposition context’ (2015) 5(4), The Lawyer Quarterly.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kysela, J. ‘Moc výkonná jako činitel právotvorby. Přehled rolí a problémů’ (2018) 51(1–2) Správní právo.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sprungk, C. ‘Legislative Transposition of Directives: Exploring the Other Role of National Parliaments in the European Union’ (2013) 51 J Common Mkt Stud.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thomann, E. ‘Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation’ (2015) 22(10) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thomas, M. ‘The Relationship between National Elections and the Delay in Transposition of E.U. Directives’ (2013) 41(6) Politic&Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thomson, R., R. Torenvlied, and J. Arregui. ‘The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives’ (2007) 37(4) British Journal of Political Science.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voermans, L. ‘Implementation: The Achilles Heel of European Integration’ (2014) 2(3) The Theory and Practice of Legislation.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wintr, J. Proměny parlamentní kultury (1st edn., Auditorium, Prague 2021).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zámečníková, M. ‘Vady zákonodárného procesu a zákonu v České republice, Německu a Rakousku’ (Leges, Prague 2018).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zbíral, R., S. Princen, and H. Smekal. ‘Differentiation through flexibility in implementation: Strategic and substantive uses of discretion in EU directives’ (2023) 24(1) European Union Politics.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zbíral, R. ‘Comparing the intensity of scrutiny for ‘domestic’ and implementing bills: does transposition of EU law reduce political contestation in national parliaments?’ (2017) 24(7) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhelyazkova, A. and E. Thomann. ‘‘I did it my way’: customisation and practical compliance with EU policies’ (2022) 29(3) Journal of European Public Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhelyazkova, A. and N. Yordanova. ‘Signalling ‘compliance’: The link between notified EU directive implementation and infringement cases’ (2015) 16(3) European Union Politics.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2022-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2084-1264

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 23 - 38

Published on: Oct 7, 2024

Published by: University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

Keywords:

Transposition,

EU Directive,

transposition deficit,

parlamentarism

Related subjects:

Law,

Public law,

Public law, other

© 2024 Michal Říha, published by University of Wroclaw, Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 14 (2024): Issue 1 (December 2024)