References
- Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Angrist, J. & Pathak, P. (2014). The Elite Illusion: Achievement Effects at Boston and New York Exam Schools. Econometrica, 82(1), 137–196.
- Bach, M., Klein, T. & McNamara, S. (2024). Access, Achievements, and Aspirations: The Impacts of School Tracking on Student Outcomes. ZEW Working Paper, Nr. 24-076.
- Bach, M. (2023). Heterogeneous Responses to School Track Choice: Evidence from the Repeal of Binding Track Recommendations. Economics of Education Review, 95, 102412.
- Baden-Württemberg. (2025. 3. Februar). Gesetz zur Änderung des Schulgesetzes für Baden-Württemberg vom 29.1.2025. Gesetzblatt für Baden-Württemberg, Nr. 6.
- Barrow, L., Sartain, L. & de la Torre, M. (2020). Increasing Access to Selective High Schools through Place-Based Affirmative Action: Unintended Consequences. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(4), 135–163.
- Berkowitz, D. & Hoekstra, M. (2011). Does High School Quality Matter? Evidence from Admissions Data. Economics of Education Review, 30(2), 280–288.
- Berlin. (2024, 20. Juli). Zweites Gesetz zur Änderung des Schulgesetzes und weiterer Rechtsvorschriften vom 10.7.2024. Gesetz- und Verordnungsblatt für Berlin, 80(28).
- Beuermann, D. & Jackson, K. (2022). The Short- and Long-Run Effects of Attending the Schools that Parents Prefer. Journal of Human Resources, 57(3), 725–746.
- Blomeyer, D., Coneus, K., Laucht, M. & Pfeiffer, F. (2009). Initial Risk Matrix, Home Resources, Ability Development and Children’s Achievement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2-3), 638–648.
- Blomeyer, D., Coneus, K., Laucht, M. & Pfeiffer, F. (2013). Early Life Adversity and Children’s Competence Development: Evidence from the Mannheim Study of Children at Risk. Journal of Economics and Statistics, 233(4), 468–485.
- Bonefeld, M. & Dickhäuser, O. (2018). (Biased) Grading of Students‘ Performance: Students‘ Names, Performance Level, and Implicit Attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(481), 1–13.
- Buchmann, C. & Park, H. (2009). Stratification and the Formation of Expectations in Highly Differentiated Educational Systems. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27(4), 245–267.
- Carrell, S., Hoekstra, M. & Kuka, E. (2018). The Long-Run Effects of Disruptive Peers. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3377–3415.
- Cullen, J., Jacob, B. & Levitt, S. (2006). The Effect of School Choice on Participants: Evidence from Randomized Lotteries. Econometrica, 74(5), 1191–1230.
- Diehl, C., Pomianowicz, K. & Hinz, T. (2024). On the Wrong Track? Perceived Track Mismatch among Ethnic Minority and Majority Students in the German Educational System. Working Paper, Nr. 35, Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality”. Universität Konstanz.
- Dudas, D.-F. (2014). Die prognostische Validität der nichtverbindlichen Gymnasialempfehlung am Ende der Grundschulzeit [Dissertation, Technische Universität Dortmund].
- Duflo, E., Dupas, P. & Kremer, M. (2011). Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1739–1774.
- Hastings, J. & Weinstein, J. (2008). Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1373–1414.
- Heisig, J. P. & Matthewes, S. H. (2022). No Evidence that Strict Educational Tracking Improves Student Performance through Classroom Homogeneity: A Critical Reanalysis of Esser and Seuring (2020). Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 51(1), 99–111.
- Hille, A., Spieß, C. K. & Staneva, M. (2016). More and More Students, Especially those from Middle-Income Households, are Using Private Tutoring. DIW Economic Bulletin, 6, 63–71.
- Holtmann, M., Rjosk, C., Jansen, M. & Lüdtke, O. (2024). The Double-Edged Sword of De-Tracking Reforms in Germany: Using a Difference-In-Differences Approach to Estimate Effects on Students‘ Educational Aspirations and Their Association With Students‘ Socioeconomic Backgrounds. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 81, 101350.
- Jackson, K. (2010). Do Students Benefit from Attending Better Schools? Evidence from Rule-based Student Assignments in Trinidad and Tobago. The Economic Journal, 120, 1399–1429.
- Klein, T. & McNamara, S. (2025). Sorting, Status, and Shadow Education: How Track Placement Shapes Parental Investment. ZEW Discussion Paper, Nr. 25-023.
- Lucas, A. & Mbiti, I. (2012). Access, Sorting, and Achievement: The Short-Run Effects of Free Primary Education in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 226–53.
- Park, H., Buchmann, C., Choi, J. & Merry, J. J. (2016). Learning Beyond the School Walls: Trends and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 231–252.
- Pfeiffer, F. (2010). Entwicklung und Ungleichheit von Fähigkeiten: Anmerkungen aus ökonomischer Sicht. In H.-H. Krüger, U. Rabe-Kleberg, R.-T. Kramer & J. Bude (Hrsg.), Bildungsungleichheit revisited. Bildung und soziale Ungleichheit vom Kindergarten bis zur Hochschule. Studien zur Schul- und Bildungsforschung (Bd. 30, S. 25–44). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
- Reichelt, M., Collischon, M. & Eberl, A. (2019). School Tracking and its Role in Social Reproduction: Reinforcing Educational Inheritance and the Direct Effects of Social Origin. British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1323–1348.
- Sachsen-Anhalt. (2025). Runderlass des Ministeriums für Bildung „Aufnahme an weiterführenden Schulen“, 8. Änderung vom 23.1.2025. Schulverwaltungsblatt des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt (SVBl. LSA), 34(1).
- Zimmermann, T. (2020). Social Influence or Rational Choice? Two Models and Their Contribution to Explaining Class Differentials in Student Educational Aspirations. European Sociological Review, 36(1), 65–81.