References
- Dertwinkel-Kalt, M., & Grossmann, M. R. P. (2025). Public Support for Environmental Regulation: When Ideology Trumps Knowledge. CESifo Working Paper, 11759.
- Dertwinkel-Kalt, M., Feldhaus, C., Ockenfels, A. & Sutter, M. (2024). Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(48), e2411740121.
- Drummond, C. & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9587–9592.
- Feldhaus, C., Reinhardt, L. & Sutter, M. (2024). Trump ante portas: Political polarization undermines rule-following behavior. CESifo Working Paper, 11485.
- Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D. & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735.
- Söllner, F. (2023). Das neue Gebäudeenergiegesetz. Wirtschaftsdienst, 103(9), 619–623.
- Suldovsky, B. (2017). The information deficit model and climate change communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science.