The Composition and Establishment of the Dispute Settlement Body in ASEAN: Legal Procedural Issue on the Appointment of Appellate Body Members
References
- Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 18-19. doi:10.1162/002081800551271
- Aust, A. (2005). Handbook of International Law, Cambridge University Press.
- Barradas. R.Z. (2021). The TPP, a horizontal overview, In Jorge A. Huerta-Goldman & David A. Gantz (Eds.). The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership: Analysis and commentary. 40-52. Cambridge University Press
- Robert, B., Leonardo, B., Hao Duy, P., Tan, H-L., and Ranyta, Y. (2016). Promoting compliance: The role of dispute settlement and monitoring mechanisms in ASEAN instruments, Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316534700
- Richard, B. B. (1986). An overview of international dispute settlement. Emory Journal of International Dispute Rosolution, 1(1), 1-32
- Bossche, P. V. d. (2008). The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, cases and materials. Cambridge University Press
- Bown, C., and M. Poulsen. (2020). The WTO dispute settlement crisis: Causes and consequences, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2020, 5–12
- Mireille, C. (1995). From theory to practice: Drafting and applying the dispute settlement understanding. In G. Marceau (Eds.), A history of law and lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The development of the rule of law in the multilateral trading System (pp. 300-310), Cambridge University Press
- Davidson, P. J. (2002). ASEAN: The evolving legal framework for economic cooperation, Times Academic Press
- Ehlermann, C-D. (2015). Revisiting the appellate body: The first six years. In G. Marceau (Eds.). A history of law and lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The development of the rules of law in the multilateral trading system (pp. 482-506). Cambridge University Press
- Gantz, D. A. and Huerta-Goldman. J. A. (2021). Introduction: The Trans-Pacific Partnership Becomes the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for TPP. In Gantz, D. A. and Huerta-Goldman. J. A. (Eds.). The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership: Analysis and Commentary. 1-4. Cambridge University Press
- Gantz, D. A. (2021). State-to-State Dispute Settlement under TPP Chapter 28 and NAFTA Chapter 20, In Gantz, D. A. and Huerta-Goldman. J. A. (Eds.). The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership: Analysis and commentary. pp. 683-94. Cambridge University Press
- Dispute Settlement at the World Trade Organization, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the Pacific Alliance. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11(4), 638-658. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaa021
- Ginsburg, T., McAdams, R. H. (2004). Adjudicating in anarchy: An expressive theory of international dispute resolution. William and Mary Law Review, 45(4). https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol45/iss4/2
- Hillman, J. (2015). Moving Towards An International Rule of Law? The Role of the GATT and the WTO in Its Development, In G. Marceau (Eds.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System (pp. 60-75), Cambridge University Press.
- Hathaway, O., & Shapiro, S. J. (2011). Outcasting: Enforcement in domestic and international law. Yale Law Journal, 121(2), 252-349
- Hsu, L. (2015). The ASEAN dispute settlement system. In J. M. Sanchita Basu, D (Eds.). The ASEAN economic community: A work in progress (pp. 382-410). Yusof Ishak Institute
- Kaplan, J. A. (1996). ASEAN’s Rubicon: A dispute settlement mechanism for AFTA. University of California, Los Angeles Pacific Basin Law Journal, 14(2), 147-195
- Koesrianti, K. (2017). Legalization and adjudicative legitimacy of the ASEAN trade dispute settlement mechanism. Comparative Law Review, 8(2), 1-28
- Koremenos, B. (2016). The Continent of International Law: Explaining agreement design, Cambridge University Press
- Lester, S., Manak, I., and Arpas, A. (2019). Access to trade justice: Fixing NAFTA’s flawed state-to-state dispute settlement process. World Trade Review, 18(1), 63-80. doi:10.1017/S147474561800006X
- Rojas, H. V. (1993). The dispute resolution process under NAFTA. United States-Mexico Law Journal, 1, 19-24
- Rong, W., Tianyi, X. (2020) . The crisis of the WTO dispute settlement and possible solution - a history assessment. Journal of WTO and China, 10 (3), 45-80
- Sacerdoti, G. (2017). The WTO dispute settlement system: Consolidating success and confronting new challenges. In Manfred, E., Bernard, H., Joost, P (Eds.), Assessing the World Trade Organization (pp. 147-171). Cambridge University Press
- Sim, E. W. (2014). The outsourcing of legal norms and institutions by the ASEAN economic community. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 1(1), 24-25
- Sim, E. W. (2020). ASEAN further enhances its dispute settlement mechanism. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 7(2), 279-292
- Smith, J. McCall. (2012). Smith, J. McCall. (2012). The politics of dispute settlement design: Explaining legalism in regional trade pacts. In Beth, A. S., and Richard H, S (Eds.), International law and international relations, (pp. 331-374), Cambridge University Press
- Stefano, I., & Sim, E. W. (2015). The foundation of the ASEAN economic community: An institutional and legal profile, Cambridge University Press
- Stanislaus, U. N. (2021). Is the WTO appellate body in limbo? The roots of the crisis in the WTO dispute settlement body and the available routes navigating the quagmire. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 24, 65-66. doi: 10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a8580
- Sundraram, J., Owolabi, A. S. (2022). Impasse at the WTO dispute settlement body: The slow demise of multilateralism?. Trade, Law and Development, 14(2), 127-156
- Vidigal, G. (2017). Why is there so little litigation under Free Trade Agreements? Retaliation and adjudication in international dispute settlement. Journal of International Economic Law, 20(4), 927-950
- Villalta Puig, G., & Tsun, Tat. L. (2015). Problems with the ASEAN free trade area dispute settlement mechanism and solutions for the ASEAN economic community. Journal of World Trade, 49(2), 277-308
- Waincymer, J. (2000). Transparency of dispute settlement within the World Trade Organization. Melbourne University Law Review, 24(3), 797-838. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00409
- Joseph, W., Shalmont, J., Fransisca,Y., Sahari, P. A. (2014, January). For a more effective and competitive ASEAN dispute settlement mechanism. SSRN Electronic Journal, p. 17. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2613871
- Yuejiao, Z. (2022). The WTO dispute settlement mechanism and its reform. Journal of WTO and China, 12(3), 15-32
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 70
Submitted on: Aug 8, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 4, 2026
Published on: Apr 30, 2026
Published by: Hochiminh City University of Law
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
Law,
© 2026 Somsack Hongvichit, published by Hochiminh City University of Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.