Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Competence to Rule on Arbitral Jurisdiction: Various Approaches Cover

Competence to Rule on Arbitral Jurisdiction: Various Approaches

Open Access
|May 2025

References

  1. Bachand, F. (2006). Does Article 8 of the Model Law call for full or prima facie review of the Arbitral Tribunal’s jurisdiction?, Arbitration International, 22(3), 463–476
  2. Barcelo, J. J. (2017, September 11). Kompetenz-Kompetenz and its negative effect: A comparative view. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-40. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3035485
  3. Barceló, J. (2003, October). Who Decides the Arbitrator’s Jurisdiction Separability and Competence-Competence in Transnational Perspective. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 36(4), 1115-1136. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/508
  4. Besson, S., & Poudret, J. (Eds.). (2007). Comparative law of international arbitration (2nd ed.). Sweets & Maxwell
  5. Born, G. (Ed.) (2009). International commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International
  6. Brekoulakis, S. (2009). The negative effect of compétence-compétence: The verdict has to be negative. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 22. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1414325
  7. Brekoulakis, S. (2005). The effect of an arbitral award and third parties in international arbitration: Res Judicata revisited. American Review of International Arbitration, 16(1)
  8. Gaillard, E., & Banifatemi, Y. (2008). Negative effect of Compétence-compétence: The rule of priority in favour of the arbitrators. In E. Gaillard & D. D. Pietro (Eds.). (2008), Enforcement of arbitration agreements and international arbitral awards: The New York Convention in practice, Cameron May
  9. Gaillard, E., & Savage, J. (Eds.) (1999). Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International
  10. Husgen, A. M. (2018). Rethinking the negative effect of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: Proposal for a restrictive approach [Master’s Thesis, Catolica Global School of Law]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
  11. Le, T. H., & Ton, N. T. B. (2018). Compétence-compétence doctrine in Vietnam – A comparative study. ALSA Academic Journal, No. AJLS 2018/19
  12. Lew, J., Mistelis, L., & Kröll, S. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative international commercial arbitration. Kluwer Law International
  13. Park, W. W. (2007, March 18). The arbitrator’s jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction. 13 ICCA Congress Series 55 (Permanent Court of Arbitration, The Hague, 2007), Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 17-33. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019225
  14. Susler, O. (2012). Jurisdiction of arbitration tribunals: A comparative study [Doctor of juridical science at La Trobe University]. Bundoora
  15. Synková, S. (2013). Courts’ inquiry into arbitral jurisdiction at the pre-award stage: A comparative analysis of the English, German and Swiss legal order. Springer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2025-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2719-3004 | Journal ISSN: 2719-5872
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 34
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2024
Accepted on: Oct 6, 2024
Published on: May 15, 2025
Published by: Hochiminh City University of Law
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Le Thi Ngoc Ha, Nguyen Vu Thuy Quynh, published by Hochiminh City University of Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.