Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Approaches to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism Under the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Cover

Approaches to the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism Under the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Philip Morris Asia Limited v. The Commonwealth of Australia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2012-12, Award on jurisdiction dated 17 December 2015
  2. Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2000), Award of 30 August 2000
  3. S. D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Partial Award dated 30 November 2000
  4. Reinisch, A. (2016), ‘The EU and investor-state dispute settlement: WTO litigators going “investor-state arbitration” and back to a permanent “investment court”’, CIGI, Investor-State Arbitration Series, Paper No. 2
  5. Reinisch, A. (2016), ‘Will the EU’s Proposal concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP lead to Enforceable Awards?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19
  6. Bonnitcha, J. and Williams, Z. P. (2022), ‘Investment dispute prevention and management agencies: Toward a more informed policy discussion’, International Institute for Sustainable Development
  7. Benedetti, J. P. (2019), ‘The proposed Investment Court System: Does it really solve the problems?’, En Revista Derecho del Estado, Universidad Externado de Colombia, No. 42, Bogotá Jan./Apr. 2019
  8. Dung, T. V. (2018), ‘The dispute resolution mechanism between investors and the sState in the EVFTA - The formation of an International Investment Court?’, in Dung, T. V. and Huong, N. T. L. (Eds.) (2018), International Investment Dispute Resolution: Legal and Practical Issues in the Context of Integration, Vietnam National University Publishing House, Ho Chi Minh City
  9. Dung, T. V. (2019), ‘Discussion on the Dispute Settlement Mechanism between Investors and States within the framework of the EVFTA and CPTPP Agreements’, Journal of State and Law, No. 4, Vol. 372
  10. Dymond, T., Lim, J. J. và Sim, C. (2020), ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration in the Asia-Pacific’, Global Arbitration Review. Retrieved from: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-asia-pacific-arbitration-review/2021/article/investment-treaty-arbitration-in-the-asia-pacific#endnote-011 [accessed September 19, 2023].
  11. European Commission (2015), Reading Guide 16 September 2015 for draft text on Investment Protection and Investment Court System in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
  12. Gao, H. (2022), ‘The investment chapter in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Enhanced rules without Enforcement mechanism’, in Kimura, F., Urata, S., Thangavelu, S., and Narjoko, D. (ed.) (2022), Dynamism of East Asia and RCEP: The framework for regional integration, Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia
  13. Huong, N. T. L. (Coordinator) (2019), ‘Dispute Resolution Mechanisms between foreign investors and host countries - Some recommendations for Vietnam’, University-Level Scientific Research Topic, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law
  14. James Love (2016), ‘2015 Oct 16 Version: RCEP draft text for investment chapter’, Kei Online: James Love’s BLOG. Retrieved from: https://www.keionline.org/23065 [accessed 18 September 2023
  15. Jingyuan, Zh. (2020), ‘An important step forward and a delicate balance – Observations on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership’, ASIL Insights, Vol. 24, No. 30
  16. Karr, S. (2017), ‘A battle for choice: Selecting investor-state arbitrators under the RCEP’, Temple Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1
  17. Kimura, F., Urata, S., Thangavelu, S., and Narjoko, D. (ed.) (2022), Dynamism of East Asia and RCEP: The framework for regional integration, Jakarta: ERIA
  18. Levashova, Y. (2020), ‘Prevention of ISDS sdisputes: From early resolution to limited access’, in Chaisse, J. et al. (eds.) (2020), Handbook of international investment law and policy, Springer
  19. Martin, P. (2016), ‘And you thought the TPP was secret. The RCEP is even worse’, Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from: https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/and-you-thought-the-tpp-was-secret-the-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-is-even-worse-20161104-gsiaaw.html [accessed 15 September 2023]
  20. Ministry of Industry and Trade (2022), ‘Hôm nay, Hiệp định RCEP bắt đầu có hiệu lực’ [Today, the RCEP Agreement comes into effect], Ministry of Industry and Trade. Retrieved from: https://moit.gov.vn/tin-tuc/thi-truong-nuoc-ngoai/hiep-dinh-rcep-se-chinhthuc-co-hieu-luc-tu-ngay-01-thang-01-nam-2022.html [accessed September 15, 2023]
  21. Padmakumara, S. C. (2021), ‘A Conceptual Analysis on ‘ASEAN Way’ as a normative approach for conducting regional affairs’, Faculty of Graduate Studies - Colombo Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research, Vol. 6, No. 1
  22. Pantaleo, L., Douma, W., and Takács, T. (eds.), Tiptoeing to TTIP: What kind of agreement for what kind of partnership?, The Hague: CLEER
  23. Price, D. (2016), ‘Indonesia’s bold strategy on bilateral investment treaties: Seeking an equitable climate for investment?’, Asian Journal of International Law, Vol. 7, No. 1,
  24. Ranald, P. (2019), ‘When even winning is losing: The surprising cost of defeating Philip Morris over plain packaging’. Retrieved from: https://phys.org/news/2019-03-defeating-philip-morris-plain-packaging.html [accessed 16 September 2023]
  25. Riley, J. (2021), ‘A multilateral approach to investor-state dispute settlement issues in the Asia-Pacific Region’, Journal of East Asia and International Law, Vol. 14, 2021
  26. Ruiz, A. M. (2016), Dispute settlement mechanisms in international investment agreements: Is there a new way towards the future?, Master’s thesis, Major in International Business Law, Tilburg University, Netherlands
  27. Sauvant, K. (2019), ‘An Advisory Centre on International Investment Law: Key features academic forum on ISDS’, Paper 2019/14, 10 September 2019
  28. UNCTAD (2019), ‘Reforming Investment Disputes Settlement: A stocktaking’, IIA Issue Note International Investment Agreements
  29. Vididal, G., Stevens, B. (2018), ‘Brazil’s new model of dispute settlement for investment: return to the past or alternative for the future?’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 19
  30. Widiatedja, I. G. N. P and Wairocana, I. G. N (2017), ‘The lack of the environmental concern in indonesia’s bilateral investment treaties’, Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 3
  31. Woon, W. (2012), ‘Dispute Settlement the ASEAN Way’, Centre for International Law, National University of Singapore. Retrieved from: https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/WalterWoon-Dispute-Settlement-the-ASEAN-Way-2012.pdf [accessed 15 September 2023]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2024-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2719-3004 | Journal ISSN: 2719-5872
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 114
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2023
Accepted on: May 12, 2024
Published on: Aug 30, 2024
Published by: Hochiminh City University of Law
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Tran Thi Thuan Giang, Vo Tan Huy, published by Hochiminh City University of Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.