Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Enhancing Investor-State Dispute Resolution: Suggestions to Optimize the Effectiveness of Cooling-Off Clauses in International Investment Agreement Negotiations Cover

Enhancing Investor-State Dispute Resolution: Suggestions to Optimize the Effectiveness of Cooling-Off Clauses in International Investment Agreement Negotiations

Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Burlington Resources Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 2 June 2010
  2. Ethyl Corp. v. Canada, UNCITRAL, Award on Jurisdiction, 24 June 1998, 38 I.L.M. 708 (1999)
  3. Franz J. Sedelmayer v. The Russian Federation, SCC (Stockholm Chamber of Commerce), Award, 7 July 1998
  4. Link-Trading Joint Stock Company v. Department for Customs Control of Republic of Moldova, UNCITRAL Arbitration, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 February 2001
  5. Murphy Exploration and Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/4, Award on Jurisdiction, 15 December 2010
  6. Occidental Petroleum Corp. & Occidental Exploration and Production Co. v. The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 9 September 2008
  7. Ronald S. Lauder v. The Czech Republic, Ad hoc Arbitration (UNCITRAL), Final Award, 3 September 2001
  8. SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2003, 8 ICSID Rep. 406 (2005)
  9. Wena Hotels Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 June 1999, 6 ICSID Rep. 74 (2004), 41 ILM 881 (2002)
  10. Dendorfer-Ditges R., and Wilhelm P. (2017), ‘Mediation in a Global Village: Legal Complexity of Cross-Border Mediation in Europe’, Yearbook on International Arbitration, No. 5
  11. Draetta, Ugo (2004), ‘The International Arbitration Clause: Essential and Optional Elements - An Update’, International Business Law Journal, Vol. 2004, No. 4
  12. Garner B. A. (2009), Black’s Law Dictionary, Ninth Edition
  13. Ganesh A. (2017), ‘Cooling Off Period (Investment Arbitration)’, Max Planck Encyclopaedias of International Law
  14. Heiskanen V., ‘Admissibility in International Arbitration’, in Cottier T., Schefer K. N. et al. (eds.) (2017), Elgar Encyclopedia of International Economic Law, Edward Elgar Publishing
  15. Huong N. T. L. et al. (2022), Determining jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals through some typical international investment disputes, Summary Report of the School - Level Scientific Research and Technology Project, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law
  16. Kaysin D. V., and Aigul F. U. (2021), ‘Cooling-off Period Clauses in Investment Treaties’, International Commercial Arbitration Review
  17. Kessedjian C. et al. (2020), Mediation in Future Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Academic Forum on ISDS Concept Paper 2020/16, 5 March 2020
  18. Pohl J., Mashigo K. and Nohen A. (2012), ‘Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, No. 02
  19. Quaide D. M. (2021), The Dark Side of the Swiss Approach to the Enforcement of Multi-Tiered Clauses: A study on the nature of multi-tiered clauses, Master Thesis at Faculty of Law - Stockholm University
  20. Shirlow E., and Gore K. N. (2022), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in Investor-State Disputes: History, Evolution and Future, Kluwer Law International
  21. Trinh H. Y., NguyenT. H. (2020). ‘Procedural transparency in the settlement of treaty-based investment disputes in EVIPA and CPTPP’, Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences, Vol. 01, No. 1, pp. 58-75, https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2020-0010
  22. Turkens U., Nguyen H. T. (2020), ‘The free trade agreement and investment dispute settlement between the European Union and Vietnam: A critical assessment’, Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences, Vol. 03, No. 2, pp. 43-83, https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2021-0003
  23. UNCITRAL (2021), Note by the Secretariat, Mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) - Possible reform of investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), ADR initial draft
  24. UNCTAD (2015), ‘Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development’. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/publication/investment-policy-framework-sustainable-development-2015-edition [accessed 29 April 2024]
  25. UNCTAD (2010), ‘Investor-State Disputes: Prevention and Alternatives to Arbitration’, UNCTAD Series on International Investment Policies for Development
  26. Vanuzer J. A., Simons P., Maeda G. (2012), ‘Integrating Sustainable Development into International Investment Agreements: A Guide for Developing Country Negotiators, Commonwealth Secretariat’. Retrieved from: https://www.iisd.org/system/files/meterial/6th_annual_forum_commonwealth_guide.pdf [accessed 29 April 2024]
  27. Voitovich S. A. (2012), ‘Agreed Settlement v. Unfavourable Award in Investment Arbitration’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 13, No. 5
  28. Vy N. N. T. and An N. T. (2020), ‘Validity of multi-tiered arbitration clauses in international arbitration and recommendations for Vietnam’, Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences, Vol. 08, No. 138
  29. Westerlund J. (2022), The enforceability of multitier dispute resolution clauses: A comparative analysis of enforcement in selected jurisdictions, University of Helsinki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2719-3004 | Journal ISSN: 2719-5872
Language: English
Page range: 44 - 61
Submitted on: Jan 10, 2024
Accepted on: May 10, 2024
Published on: May 26, 2024
Published by: Hochiminh City University of Law
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Nguyen Thi Lan Huong, Hoang Thi Khanh Hien, published by Hochiminh City University of Law
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.