A Proposal for the Abandonment of the Writing Requirement for Arbitration Agreements in National Laws

Van Dai Do

doi:10.2478/vjls-2020-0008

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

A Proposal for the Abandonment of the Writing Requirement for Arbitration Agreements in National Laws

Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences

Volume 2 (2020): Issue 1 (September 2020)

By: Van Dai Do

Open Access

|Oct 2020

Abstract

An arbitration agreement is an agreement in which two or more parties agree that a dispute which has arisen or may arise between them shall be resolved by one or more arbitrators. For the past decades, the written form has been a key requirement for arbitration agreements. However, there has arisen a shift in national laws towards the abandonment of this formal requirement to give the parties more freedom in the expression of their arbitration agreement. This argues for this abandonment and discusses how this can be realized in national laws.

References

[1] Ancel M.-E., Deumier P. and Laazouzi M. (2017), Droit des contrats internationaux, Sirey
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Bassiri N. and Draye M. (eds) (2016), Arbitration in Belgium, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Bosman L., (ed) (2019), ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Born G. B. (2014), International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Brekoulakis S., Lew J. D. M., and al. (eds) (2016), The Evolution and Future of International Arbitration, International Arbitration Law Library
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Gaillard E. and Savage J. (eds) (1999), Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Gomez K. F. and Lopez-Rodriguez A. M., (eds) (2019), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Holtzmann H. M., Neuhaus J. and al. (2015), A Guide to the 2006 Amendments to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Leaua C. and Baias F.-A. (eds) (2016), Arbitration in Romania: A Practitioner’s Guide, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Lew J. D. M., Mistellis L. A. and Kroll S. (2003), Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Mistelis L. A. (2015), Concise International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Racine J.-B. (2016), Droit de l’arbitrage, Puf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Paulsson J. (ed) (2019), ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Sanders P. (ed) (1989), Arbitration in Settlement of International Commercial Disputes Involving the Far East and Arbitration in Combined Transportation, ICCA Congress Series, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Berg A. J. V. D. (ed) (1978), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Berg A. J. V. D. (ed) (1982), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Berg A. J. V. D. (ed) (1987), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Berg A. J. V. D. (ed) (1999), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Berg A. J. V. D. (ed) (2003), International Commercial Arbitration: Important Contemporary Questions, ICCA Congress Series, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Berg A. J. V. D. (ed) (2013), International Arbitration: The Coming of a New Age?, ICCA & Kluwer Law International
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] Hẹainlan S. A. (2012), ‘The New Saudi Arbitration Act: A Comprehensive and Article-by-Article Review’, International Journal of Arab Arbitration, p.24
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] Caprasse O. (2013), ‘Le nouveau droit belge de l’arbitrage’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, p.959
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] Castellane B. (2011), ‘The New French Law on International Arbitration’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.373
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] Clay T. (2012), ‘Liberté, Égalité, Efficacité: La devise du nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage Commentaire article par article (Deuxième partie)’, Clunet n° 3, doctr. 8, Article 1507
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[25] Dundas H. R. (2010), ‘The Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010-A New Era Begins’, Asian Dispute Review, p.108
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[26] Dundas H. R. (2016), ‘The Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010: A Great Collaborative Success and an Innovative Model for Other Jurisdictions to Follow’, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, p.89
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[27] El-Ahdab A. H. (2009), ‘The new Algerian arbitration law’, International Journal of Arab Arbitration, pp. 9 – 87
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[28] Jarrosson C. and Pellerin J. (2011), ‘Le droit français de l’arbitrage après le décret du 13 janvier 2011’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, p.64
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[29] Jarvin S. H. L. and Young B. (1999), ‘A New Arbitration Regime in Sweden - The Swedish Arbitration Act 1999 and the Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.91
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[30] Fan K., Stackpool-Moore R. and El-Ahdab J. (2014), ‘Un point (de vue) actuel sur l’arbitrage en Chine et à Hong Kong: Toujours un pays, deux systèmes?’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, p.838
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[31] Finch J. and Aye T. (2016), ‘International Arbitration Under Myanmar’s Arbitration Law’, Asian International Arbitration Journal, p.238
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[32] Kawharu A. (2007), ‘The Public Policy Ground for Setting Aside and Refusing Enforcement of Arbitral Awards’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.511
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[33] Kennedy-Grant T. (2008), ‘The New Zealand Experience of the UNCITRAL Model Law: A Review of the Position as at 31 December 2007’, Asian International Arbitration Journal, p.510.54648/AIAJ2008001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[34] Manitlla-Serrano F. (2004), ‘La nouvelle loi espagnole du 23 décembre 2003 sur l’arbitrage’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, p.241
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[35] Mayer P. (1994), ‘De l’autonomie de la clause compromissoire’, Revue critique du droit international privé, p. 663
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[36] Nourissat C. (2011), ‘Le nouveau droit français de l’arbitrage (décret n° 2011-48 du 13 janvier 2011 portant réforme de l’arbitrage)’, n° 3 Procédures, étude 3 (n° 12)10.3917/rcdip.113.0553
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[37] Sippel H. (2017), ‘An Overview of the Revisions to the New Korean Arbitration Act: Will Korea Now Become an East Asian Arbitration Hub?’, German Arbitration Journal, pp. 90 – 95
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[38] Piers M. and Meulemeester D. D. (2013), ‘The New Arbitration Law – Belgium Adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law’, Asian International Arbitration Journal, p.153
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[39] Reetz C. R. (2009), ‘Recent developments concerning the “writing” requirement in international commercial arbitration: a perspective from the United States’, Spain Arbitration Review, p.30
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[40] Sherer M. (1994), ‘Some brief comments on the Draft of the new Swedish Arbitration Act’, ASA Bulletin, p.282
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[41] Sorieul R. (2005), ‘UNCITRAL’s Current Work in the Field of International Commercial Arbitration’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.544
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[42] Velissaropoulos-Karakostas J. (2000), ‘L’arbitrage dans la Grèce antique-Epoques archaïque et classique’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, p.18
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[43] Villaggi F. (2018), ‘Recent Developments in the Arbitration Legislation in Argentina’, Journal of International Arbitration, pp. 225 – 25210.54648/JOIA2018012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[44] Verbist H. (2013), ‘New Belgian Arbitration Law of 24 June 2013 and New CEPANI Arbitration Rules of 1 January 2013’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.600
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[45] Weir M. E. L. (1987), ‘Arbitration in Scotland’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.36
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[46] Wilson D. (2010), ‘The Resurgence of Scotland as a Force in International Arbitration: The Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010’, Journal of International Arbitration, p.687
Search in Google Scholar Back to article