Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Philippines and Vietnam’s Responses to the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Final Award on the Arbitration Case Initiated by the Philippines Against China over the South China Sea (July 2016) Cover

The Philippines and Vietnam’s Responses to the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Final Award on the Arbitration Case Initiated by the Philippines Against China over the South China Sea (July 2016)

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. ABS-CBN News. 2016. “Rodrigo Duterte: Pagbabago or Bust.” Online: https://news.abscbn.com/focus/06/29/16/rodrigo-duterte-pagbabago-or-bust (accessed: July 10, 2019).
  2. Amer, Ramses. 2014. “China, Vietnam, and the South China Sea: Disputes and Dispute Management.” Ocean Development and International Law, 45 (1), pp. 17–40.
  3. Askandar, Kamarulzaman and Carlervin Sukim. 2016. “Making Peace over a Disputed Territory in Southeast Asia: Lessons from the Batu Puteh / Pedra Branca Case.” The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 3 (1), pp. 65–85.
  4. Bautista, Lowell. 2016. “The Philippines and the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award: A Sombre Victory and Uncertain Times Ahead.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 38 (3), pp. 349–355.
  5. Baviera, Aileen S.P. 2014. “Domestic Interests and Foreign Policy in China and the Philippines: Implications for the South China Sea Disputes.” Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethno-graphic Viewpoints, 62 (1), pp.133–143.
  6. Baviera, Aileen S.P. 2016. “The Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute: Security Interests and Perspectives”. In I. Storey and C.Y. Lin, eds., The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, pp.161–185.
  7. BBC. 2011. “Vietnam in Live-Fire Drill Amid South China Sea Row.” BBC, June 13, 2011; online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13745587 (accessed: July 17, 2019).
  8. Branigan, Tania. 2011. “Vietnam Holds Live-Fire Exercises as Territorial Dispute with China Escalates.” The Guardian, June 14, 2011; online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jun/14/china-vietnam-dispute-military-exercise (accessed: July 17, 2019).
  9. Butcher, John G. 2013. “The International Court of Justice and the Territorial Dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 35 (2), pp. 235–257.
  10. Castro, Renato Cruz De 2016. “The Duterte Administration’s Foreign Policy: Unravelling the Aquino Administration’s Balancing Agenda on an Emergent China.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35 (3), pp.139–159.10.1177/186810341603500307
  11. Chen Shaofeng. 2018. “Regional Responses to China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Contemporary China, 27 (111), pp. 344–361.
  12. CNBC. 2016. “Philippines Says Dropping South China Sea Ruling from ASEAN Statement No Win for China.” CNBC, July 26, 2016; online: https://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/26/philippines-says-dropping-south-china-sea-ruling-from-asean-statement-no-win-for-china.html (accessed: July 9, 2019).
  13. Esmaquel II, Paterno. 2016. “Duterte: PH Won’t ‘Flaunt’ Sea Dispute Ruling vs China.” Rappler, June 30, 2016; online: https://www.rappler.com/nation/138195-duterte-flaunt-ruling-case-china-yasay-cabinet (accessed: July 9, 2019).
  14. Garrison, Jean and Marc Wall. 2016. “The Rise of Hedging and Regionalism: An Explanation and Evaluation of President Obama’s China Policy.” Asian Affairs: An American Review, 43 (2), pp. 47–63.
  15. Guzman, Charles Joseph De 2014. “Philippines-China Relations, 2001-2008: Dovetailing National Interests.” Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia, 50 (1), pp. 71–97.
  16. Heydarian, Richard Javad. 2017. “Tragedy of Small Power Politics: Duterte and the Shifting Sands of Philippine Foreign Policy.” Asian Security, 13 (3), pp. 220–236.
  17. Heydarian, Richard Javad. 2018. “Mare Liberum: Aquino, Duterte, and The Philippines’ Evolving Lawfare Strategy in the South China Sea.” Asian Politics and Policy, 10 (2), pp. 283–299.
  18. Keck, Zachary. 2014. “Vietnam Threatens Legal Action Against China.” The Diplomat, June 2, 2014; online: https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/vietnam-threatens-legal-action-against-china/ (accessed: July 23, 2019).
  19. Nguyen, Manh Hung. 2017. “The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s Award on the South China Sea Dispute between the Philippines and China: Views from America.” In J. Borton, ed., Islands and Rocks in the South China Sea: Post-Hague Ruling. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris US, pp. 116–128.
  20. PCA. 2015. Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. Online: https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1506 (accessed: July 3, 2019).
  21. PCA. 2016. Award. Online: https://www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086 (accessed: July 5, 2019).
  22. Quintos, Mary Fides A. 2018. “The Philippines: Hedging in a Post-Arbitration South China Sea?” Asian Politics and Policy, 10 (2), pp. 261–282.
  23. Reuters. 2016. Philippines’ Duterte Wants to ‘Open Alliances’ with Russia, China. Online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-politics-duterte-idUSKCN11W17T (accessed: July 14, 2019).
  24. Shoji, Tomotaka. 2016. “Vietnam’s Omnidirectional Military Diplomacy: Focusing on the South China Sea.” NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, 17, pp. 41–61.
  25. Shoji, Tomotaka and Hideo Tomikawa. 2017. “Southeast Asia: Duterte Takes Office, South China Sea in Flux.” In Shinji Hyodo, ed., East Asian Strategic Review 2017. Tokyo: The Japan Times, Ltd., pp. 131–155.
  26. Southgate, Laura and Nicholas Khoo. 2016. “Enter the Vanguard State: Reinterpreting ASEAN’s Response to the South China Sea Issue.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 3 (2), pp. 221–244.
  27. Storey, Ian. 2016a. “Rising Tensions in the South China Sea: Southeast Asian Responses.” In I. Storey and C.Y Lin, eds., The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute; pp. 134–160.10.1355/9789814695565-007
  28. Storey, Ian. 2016b. “Assessing Responses to the Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea.” ISEAS Perspective, 43. Singapore: Yusof Ishak Institute.
  29. Thayer, Carlyle A. 2011. “Chinese Assertiveness in the South China Sea and Southeast Asian Responses.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30 (2), pp. 77–104.
  30. Thayer, Carlyle A. 2016. “Vietnam’s Strategy of ‘Cooperating and Struggling’ with China over Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 3 (2), pp. 200–220.
  31. Thayer, Carlyle A. 2017a. “Dead in the Water: The South China Sea Arbitral Award, One Year Later.” The Diplomat, June 28, 2017; online: https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/dead-in-the-water-the-south-china-sea-arbitral-award-one-year-later/ (accessed: August 4, 2019).
  32. Thayer, Carlyle A. 2017b. Vietnam’s Foreign Policy in an Era of Rising Sino-US Competition and Increasing Domestic Political Influence. Asian Security, 13 (3), pp. 183–199.
  33. The Philippines Department of Foreign Affairs. 2016. “Statement of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs.” Online: https://www.dfa.gov.ph/documents-on-the-west-philippine-sea (accessed: July 6, 2019).
  34. Tran, Truong Thuy. 2016. “Vietnam’s Relations with China and the US and the Role of ASEAN.” In Security Outlook of the Asia Pacific Countries and Its Implications for the Defense Sector. Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studies, pp. 87–96.
  35. Vietnam Embassy in Germany. 2014. “Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung Answers to Associated Press on 21 May.” Online: http://www.vietnambotschaft.org/prime-minister-nguyen-tan-dung-answers-to-associated-press-on-21-may/ (accessed: August 5, 2019).
  36. Vietnam MOFA. 2014. “Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of The Socialist Republic of Vietnam Transmitted to the Arbitral Tribunal in the Proceedings between The Republic of the Philippines and The People’s Republic of China.” Online: https://iuscogen.files.word-press.com/2018/03/statement-of-mofa-of-vietnam-to-the-tribunal.pdf (accessed: July 9, 2019).
  37. Vietnam MOFA. 2016. “Remarks of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Viet Nam on Viet Nam’s Reaction to the Issuance of the Award by the Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the Arbitration between the Philippines and China.” Online: http://www.mofa.gov.vn/en/tt_baochi/pbnfn/ns160712211059 (accessed: July 9, 2019).
  38. Vnexpress. 2017. “Đội tàu ngầm Kilo [The Kilo Submarines].” Vnexpress, August 3, 2017; online: https://vnexpress.net/interactive/2017/suc-manh-6-tau-ngam-kilo-viet-nam (accessed: August 2, 2019).
  39. Vu, Truong Minh and Thanh Trung Nguyen. 2017. “Vietnam’s Foreign Policy after the South China Sea Ruling.” Thinking ASEAN, 20, pp. 8–13.
  40. Yasay, Perfecto R. 2016. “Come, Let Us Reason Together: Remarks of the Hon. Perfecto R.Yasay, Jr. Secretary of Foreign Affairs at the Second Manila Conference on the South China Sea.” Online: https://www.dfa.gov.ph/speeches-and-statements/10079-come-let-us-reason-together (accessed: July 11, 2019).
  41. Zha, Daojiong and Mark J. Valencia. 2001. “Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 31 (1), pp. 86–103.
  42. Zha, Wen. 2015. “Personalized Foreign Policy Decision-Making and Economic Dependence: A Comparative Study of Thailand and the Philippines’ China Policies.” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 37 (2), pp. 242–268.
  43. Zhang, Feng. 2017. “Assessing China’s Response to the South China Sea Arbitration Ruling.” Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71 (4), pp. 440–459.
  44. Zunes, Stephen. 2004. “Implications of the U.S. Reaction to the World Court Ruling against Israel’s ‘Separation Barrier.’” Middle East Policy, IX (4), pp. 72–85.
Language: English
Page range: 155 - 178
Published on: Dec 30, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Nguyen Huong Thach Thao, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.