Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Beyond Markets and Borders: On the Community of Values Among Producers in the Bioeconomy Cover

Beyond Markets and Borders: On the Community of Values Among Producers in the Bioeconomy

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Afshar Jahanshahi, A. – Brem, A. – Bhattacharjee, A. 2017. Who Takes More Sustainability-Oriented Entrepreneurial Actions? The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Values, Beliefs and Orientations. In Sustainability, vol. 9, 2017, no. 10, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101636
  2. Arshi, T.A. – Wallis, J. 2024. Entrepreneurial values and circular economy adoption: A cross-lagged SEM-based machine learning study. In Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 12, 2024, no. 2, pp. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120210
  3. Bengtsson, M. et al. 2018. Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency. In Sustainability Science, vol. 13, 2018, no. 6, pp. 1533–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1
  4. Biga, B. et al. (eds). 2017. Open eyes book. In Międzynarodowy Kongres Ekonomii Wartości Open Eyes Economy Summit, Kraków : Fundacja Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej, 2017.
  5. Bijon, N. et al. 2022. Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy through Industrial Symbiosis: Current Situation and Perspectives. In Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, no. 3, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031605
  6. Booth, D. 2021. Post-materialism as a basis for achieving environmental sustainability. In The Journal of Population and Sustainability, vol. 5, 2021, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.3197/jps.2021.5.2.97
  7. Cromie, S. – Johns, S. 1983. Irish Entrepreneurs: Some Personal Characteristics. In Journal of Occupational Behaviour, vol. 4, 1983, no. 4, pp. 317–324.
  8. D’Amico, G. et al. 2022. Smart and Sustainable Bioeconomy Platform: A New Approach towards Sustainability. In Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, no. 1, p. 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010466
  9. Dembinski, P.H. 2011. The Incompleteness of the Economy and Business: A Forceful Reminder. In Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 100, 2011, no. S1, pp. 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1185-2
  10. Diaz Tautiva, J.A. et al. 2023. Understanding the role of institutions and economic context on entrepreneurial value creation choice. In Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 14, 2023, no. 2, pp. 405–447. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.011
  11. Dietz, T. et al. 2018. Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies. In Sustainability, vol. 10, 2018, no. 9, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
  12. European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. 2018. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment : updated bioeconomy strategy. LU : Publications Office. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/792130 (Accessed: 11 March 2025).
  13. Galutskykh, N.А. – Didorchuk, I.L. 2024. The Current Trends in the World Market of Organic Products. In Business Inform, vol. 2, 2024, no. 553, pp. 20–26. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-2-20-26
  14. Gardner, H.J. – Martin, M.A. 2007. Analyzing Ordinal Scales in Studies of Virtual Environments: Likert or Lump It! In Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 16, 2007, no. 4, pp. 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.439
  15. Gawel, E. – Pannicke, N. – Hagemann, N. 2019. A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy – The Crucial Role of Sustainability. In Sustainability, vol. 11, 2019, no. 11, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005
  16. Goldstein, J.S. 1985. Kondratieff Waves as War Cycles. In International Studies Quarterly, vol. 29, 1985, no. 4, p. 411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600380
  17. Gómez-Haro, S. – Aragón-Correa, J.A. – Cordón-Pozo, E. 2011. Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship. In Management Decision, vol. 49, 2011, no. 10, pp. 1677–1693. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183825
  18. Grossauer, F. – Stoeglehner, G. 2023. Bioeconomy – A Systematic Literature Review on Spatial Aspects and a Call for a New Research Agenda. In Land, vol. 12, 2023, no. 1, p. 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010234
  19. Hampden-Turner, C. – Trompenaars, F. 1995. The seven cultures of capitalism: value systems for creating wealth in the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands. 1st ed., London : Piatkus, 1995.
  20. Hassegawa, M. et al. 2022. Innovative forest products in the circular bioeconomy. In Open Research Europe, vol. 2, p. 19. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.14413.2
  21. Hausner, J. – Paprocki, W. – Gronicki, M. 2018. Polski archipelag rozwoju w warunkach globalnej niepewności (The Polish Development Archipelago in the Face of Global Uncertainty). Sopot : Centrum Myśli Strategicznych, 2018 (in Polish).
  22. Hechavarría, D.M. et al. 2017. Taking care of business: the impact of culture and gender on entrepreneurs’ blended value creation goals. In Small Business Economics, vol. 48, 2017, no. 1, pp. 225–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9747-4
  23. Hofstede, G.H. – Hofstede, G.J. – Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. 3rd ed., New York : McGraw-Hill, 2010.
  24. Holm, H.J. – Opper, S. – Nee, V. 2013. Entrepreneurs Under Uncertainty: An Economic Experiment in China. In Management Science, vol. 59, 2013, no. 7, pp. 1671–1687. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1670
  25. Hornaday, J.A. – Bunker, C.S. 1970. The Nature of the Entrepreneur. In Personnel Psychology, vol. 23, 1970, no. 1, pp. 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1970.tb01634.x
  26. Inglehart, R. 1981. Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity. In American Political Science Review, vol. 75, 1981, no. 4, pp. 880–900. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962290
  27. Jacob-John, J. et al. 2021. Synergistic Interactions of SDGs in Food Supply Chains: A Review of Responsible Consumption and Production. In Sustainability, vol. 13, 2021, no. 16, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168809
  28. Jamieson, S. 2004. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. In Medical Education, vol. 38, 2004, no. 12, pp. 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
  29. Jones, P. – Comfort, D. – Hillier, D. 2018. The sustainable development goals and retailing. In World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 14, 2018, no. 5, p. 608. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2018.094335
  30. Joseph, T.M. et al. 2023. Emerging Bio-Based Polymers from Lab to Market: Current Strategies, Market Dynamics and Research Trends. In C Journal of Carbon Research, vol. 9, 2023, no. 1, p. 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/c9010030
  31. Kaesehage, K. et al. 2019. Seriously Personal: The Reasons that Motivate Entrepreneurs to Address Climate Change. In Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 157, 2019, no. 4, pp. 1091–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3624-1
  32. Kobayashi, Y. et al. 2019. Time evolution of companies towards a stable scaling curve obtained from flow diagrams in three-dimensional phase space. In New Journal of Physics, vol. 21, 2019, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab0e55
  33. Kotane, I. 2015. Use of Financial and non-financial Indicators in Evaluation of Company’s Performance. In CBU International Conference Proceedings, 2015, pp. 224–233. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v3.605
  34. Kraus, S. et al. 2020. The sharing economy: a bibliometric analysis of the state-of-the-art. In International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, vol. 26, 2020, no. 8, pp. 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438
  35. Leonor, M.M.R. – Easud, G.S.M. – Fernando, P.P.L. 2022. Indeterminate Likert Scale in Social Sciences Research. In International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, vol. 19, 2022, no. 1, pp. 289–297. https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190125
  36. Liobikiene, G. et al. 2019. Evaluation of bioeconomy in the context of strong sustainability. In Sustainable Development, vol. 27, 2019, no. 5, pp. 955–964. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1984
  37. Loorbach, D.A. – Lijnis Huffenreuter, R. 2013. Exploring the economic crisis from a transition management perspective. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 6, 2013, pp. 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.01.003
  38. Lozano, R. – Barreiro-Gen, M. 2023. Organisations’ contributions to sustainability. An analysis of impacts on the Sustainable Development Goals. In Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 32, 2023, no. 6, pp. 3371–3382. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3305
  39. Luchian, I. – Doncev, T. 2023. Actual global trends the of sharing economy. In in Economic growth in the conditions of globalization, vol. II. International Scientific-Practical Conference ‘Economic growth in the conditions of globalization. In National Institute for Economic Research, 2023, pp. 114–120. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.cecg.III.2023.17.14
  40. Macha-Huamán, R. et al. 2023. Business Model Canvas in the entrepreneurs’ business model: a system approach. In ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.3594
  41. Majeed, M.U. et al. 2022. Green Marketing Approaches and Their Impact on Green Purchase Intentions: Mediating Role of Green Brand Image and Consumer Beliefs towards the Environment. In Sustainability, vol. 14, 2022, no. 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811703
  42. Marx, C. 2015. Capital A Critique of Political Economy. on-line. www.marxists.org. Available at: www.chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2025)
  43. McClelland, D.C. 1976. The achieving society. New York : Irvington, 1976.
  44. Menger, C. 2011. Principles of economics. Pocketbook edition. Translated by J. Dingwall and B.F. Hoselitz. Auburn, Alabama : Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.
  45. Palley, T. – Rochon, L.-P. – Vernengo, M. 2012. Statement of the Co-Editors: Economics and the economic crisis: the case for change. In Review of Keynesian Economics, 2012, no. 1, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2012.01.00
  46. Palmer, E. – Burton, R. – Haskins, C. 2020. A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context. In Sustainability, vol. 12, 2020, no. 16, p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166650
  47. Pandey, J. – Tewary, N.B. 1979. Locus of control and achievement values of entrepreneurs. In Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 52, 1979, no. 2, pp. 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1979.tb00446.x
  48. Pradhan, P. et al. 2017. A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. In Earth’s Future, vol. 5, 2017, no. 11, pp. 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632
  49. Ray, P.H. – Anderson, S.R. 2000. The cultural creatives: how 50 million people are changing the world. 1st ed., New York: Harmony Books, 2000.
  50. Ronzon, T. – Sanjuán, A.I. 2020. Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence. In Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 254, 2020, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119832
  51. Santos, S.C. et al. 2021. Understanding how and when personal values foster entrepreneurial behavior: A humane perspective. In Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 59, 2021, no. 3, pp. 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1888384
  52. Schröder, P. et al. 2019. SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production – Potential Benefits and Impacts on Forests and Livelihoods. In Katila, P. et al. (eds). Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People. 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 386–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765015.014
  53. Schütte, G. 2018. What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? In New Biotechnology, vol. 40, 2018, pp. 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003
  54. Schwartz, D. – Loewenstein, G. – Agüero-Gaete, L. 2020. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour through green identity labelling. In Nature Sustainability, vol. 3, 2020, no. 9, pp. 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0543-4
  55. Singh, S. 1989. Personality Characteristics, Work Values, and Life Styles of Fast- and Slow-Progressing Small-Scale Industrial Entrepreneurs. In The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 129, 1989, no. 6, pp. 801–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9712088
  56. Smith, A. 2005. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. USA : Pennsylvania State University (an electronic classics series publication). Available at: www.chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.rrojasdatabank.info/Wealth-Nations.pdf (Accessed: 1 April 2025)
  57. Székács, A. 2017. Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy. In Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol. 30, 2017, no. 1, pp. 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1
  58. Tehseen, S. – Haider, S.A. 2021. Impact of Universities’ Partnerships on Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurship Intentions: A Comparative Study. In Sustainability, vol. 13, 2021, no. 9, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095025
  59. Van Gogh, R. et al. 2025. Could you show me the path(s) to slow fashion consumption? An application of the prototype willingness model. In Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, vol. 29, 2025, no. 2, pp. 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2023-0057
  60. Yasir, N. et al. 2023. The Environmental Values Play a Role in the Development of Green Entrepreneurship to Achieve Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention. In Sustainability, vol. 15, 2023, no. 8, pp. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086451
  61. Zhang, X. et al. 2022. Networks open the door to the success of technological entrepreneurship: a perspective on political skills. In Kybernetes, vol. 51, 2022, no. 12, pp. 3487–3507. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2021-0050
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2025-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1339-3367 | Journal ISSN: 1338-8339
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 30
Published on: Jul 29, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Małgorzata Pink, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.