Bio-Objectification and Biobanks

Karastergiou, Anestis

doi:10.2478/vjbsd-2024-0005

Abstract

Bio-objectification is presented in this paper along with a discussion about the boundaries of life in the biomedicalization paradigm, including the biobanking processes that are crucial to the emergence of bio-objects. Regarding methods and materials, STS methodology is implemented and the actor networks that play a significant role to bio-objectification are investigated. The discussion follows through these lens on how bio-objects are co-produced through a multitude of sociotechnical factors, reflecting on how the emergence of bio-objects and the concept of life that stems from them are socially constructed. The standardization of biobanks, population construction through a co-production of technosocial factors, the momentariness of bio-objectification, and the concept of bio-identification are presented and critically reflected upon. The main purpose is to combine a philosophical perspective with an STS one regarding the issue of shifting the boundaries of life through the concept of bio-objectification.

References

Allen, C. – Neal, J. 2020. Teleological Notions in Biology. In Zalta, E.N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford : Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boeckhout, M. – Douglas, C.M.W. 2015. Governing the research-care divide in clinical biobanking: Dutch perspectives. In Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 11, 2015, no. 7, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0025-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, N. – Williams, R. 2015. Cord blood banking – bio-objects on the borderlands between community and immunity. In Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 11, 2015, no. 11, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0029-8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Canguilhem, G. 2008. Aspects of vitalism. In Canguilhem, G. Knowledge of life. (ed.) – Marrati, P. – Meyers, T. (trans.) –Geroulanos, S. – Ginsburg, D. New York : Fordham University Press, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holmberg, T. – Schwennesen, N. – Webster, A. 2014. Bio-objects and the bioobjectification process. In Gajović, S. (ed.). Bioobjects at the intersection of medicine, science and society. Zagreb : Medicinska Naklada; 2014, pp. 9–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lennon, K. 2019. Feminist Perspectives on the Body. In Zalta, E.N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford : Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2019.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stephens, N. – Brown, N. – Douglas, C. 2018. Editors introduction: biobanks as sites of bio-objectification. In Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 14, 2018, no. 6, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0070-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stephens, N. – Dimond, R. 2015. Unexpected tissue and the biobank that closed: an exploration of value and the momentariness of bio-objectification processes. In Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vo. 11, 2015, no. 14, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0032-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tamminen, S. 2015. Bio-objectifying European bodies: standardisation of biobanks in the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure. In Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 11, 2015, no. 13, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0031-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tupasela, A. – Snell, K. – Cañada, J. A. 2015. Constructing populations in biobanking. In Life Sciences, Society and Policy, vol. 11, 2015, no. 5, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0024-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Webster, A. 2012. Introduction: Bio-Objects: Exploring the Boundaries of Life. In Vermeulen, N. – Tamminen, S. – Webster, A. 2012. Bio-objects: life in the 21^st century, Theory, technology, and society. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Bio-Objectification and Biobanks

Abstract

Paradigm

My account