Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conservation of Forest, Based on a Fuelwood Substitute as Well as Considering the Cultural and Spiritual Values: An Optimal Fuelwood Harvest Model Cover

Conservation of Forest, Based on a Fuelwood Substitute as Well as Considering the Cultural and Spiritual Values: An Optimal Fuelwood Harvest Model

By: Polash Banerjee  
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. ADHIKARI, R. 2002. Impact of biogas programme on forest conservation. Institute of Forestry, Pokhara Tribhuvan University, Nepal, 2002. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262675001_Impact_of_biogas_programme_on_forest_conservation
  2. AGARWALA, M. – GHOSHAL, S. – VERCHOT, L. – MARTIUS, C. – AHUJA, R. – DEFRIES, R. 2017. Impact of biogas interventions on forest biomass and regeneration in southern India. In Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 11, 2017, pp. 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.06.00510.1016/j.gecco.2017.06.005
  3. AGNOLETTI, M. – SANTORO, A. 2015. Cultural values and sustainable forest management: The case of Europe. In Journal of Forest Research, vol. 20, 2015, no. 5, pp. 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-015-0500-710.1007/s10310-015-0500-7
  4. AMACHER, G. – OLLIKAINEN, M. – KOSKELA, E. A. 2009. Economics of Forest Resources. 1st ed. The MIT Press, 2009.
  5. BAUER, H. 1996. Automotive handbook. 4th ed., Robert Bosch Gmbtt, 1996.
  6. BHUTIA, K. D. 2021. Trees as Village Protectors, Guru Rinpoche’s Wayfinders and Adopted Family Members: Arboreal Imagination, Agency and Relationality in Sikkim. In Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, vol. 25, 2021, no. 2, pp. 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-0250200610.1163/15685357-02502006
  7. BRAHMA, B. – NATH, A. J. – DEB, C. – SILESHI, G. W. – SAHOO, U. K. – KUMAR DAS, A. 2021. A critical review of forest biomass estimation equations in India. In Trees, Forests and People, vol. 5, 2021, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.10009810.1016/j.tfp.2021.100098
  8. BROWN, G. – TOLSMA, A. – MURPHY, S. – MIEHS, A. – MCNABB, E. – YORK, A. 2009. Ecological impacts of firewood collection – a literature review to inform firewood management on public land in Victoria. Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2009.
  9. BULTE, E. – VAN SOEST, D. 1996. A Note on High Discount Rates and Depletion of Primary Forests. In Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 21, 1996, no. 2, pp. 341–350..
  10. CLARK, C. W. (1990). The Mathematical bioeconomics. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, 1990.
  11. DANIEL, T. C. – MUHAR, A. – ARNBERGER, A. – AZNAR, O. – BOYD, J. W. – CHAN, K. M. A. – COSTANZA, R. – ELMQVIST, T. – FLINT, C. G. – GOBSTER, P. H. – GRÊT-REGAMEY, A. – LAVE, R. – MUHAR, S. – PENKER, M. – RIBE, R. G. – SCHAUPPENLEHNER, T. – SIKOR, T. – SOLOVIY, I. – SPIERENBURG, M. ... – VON DER DUNK, A. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, 2012, no. 23, pp. 8812–8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111477310910.1073/pnas.1114773109338414222615401
  12. DURUAKU, J. I. – AJIWE, V. I. E. – OKOYE, N. H. – ARINZE, R. U. 2016. An Evaluation of the Calorific Values of the Branches and Stems of 11 Tropical Trees. In Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, vol. 6, 2016, no. 44. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2016.6200510.4236/jsbs.2016.62005
  13. FAUSTMANN, M. 1849. Calculation of value which forest land and immature stand possess. In Reprinted in Journal of Forest Economics, vol. 1, 1849, pp. 89–114.10.4324/9781315182681-2
  14. GAN, J. – KOLISON, S. H. – COLLETTI, J. P. 2001. Optimal forest stock and harvest with valuing non-timber benefits: A case of US coniferous forests. In Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 2, 2001, no. 2, pp. 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X
  15. GOMPIL, B. – TSEVEEN, B. – ALMASBEK, J. 2022. Modeling and control of Mongolian forest utilization: Impact of illegal logging. In Natural Resource Modeling, vol. 35, 2022, no. 1, e12333. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.1233310.1111/nrm.12333
  16. GREĢE-STALTMANE, E. – TUHERM, H. 2010. Importance of Discount Rate in Latvian Forest Valuation. In Baltic Forestry, vol. 16, 2010, no. 2, pp. 303–311.
  17. HARTMAN, R. 1976. The Harvesting Decision Whena Standing Forest Has Valuea. In Economic Inquiry, vol. 14, 1976, no. 1, pp. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x
  18. HELTBERG, R. – ARNDT, T. C. – SEKHAR, N. U. 2000. Fuelwood Consumption and Forest Degradation: A Household Model for Domestic Energy Substitution in Rural India. In Land Economics, vol. 76, 2000, no. 2, pp. 213–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/314722510.2307/3147225
  19. IHEMEZIE, E. J. – NAWRATH, M. – STRAUß, L. – STRINGER, L. C. – DALLIMER, M. 2021. The influence of human values on attitudes and behaviours towards forest conservation. In Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 292, 2021, 112857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11285710.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11285734051474
  20. JAGGER, P. – KITTNER, N. 2017. Deforestation and biomass fuel dynamics in Uganda. In Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 105, 2017, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.00510.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.005
  21. JOSHEE, B. R. – AMACHER, G. S. – HYDE, W. F. 2000. Household fuelwood production and consumption, substitution and innovation in two districts of Nepal in Economics of forestry and rural development: An empirical introduction from Asia. The University of Michigan press, Michigan, 2000.
  22. KALLIO, M. – DYKSTRA, D. – BINKLEY, C. Z. 1987. The global forest sector: An analytical perspective. In The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective, 1987. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19880621285
  23. KANT, S. 2000. A dynamic approach to forest regimes in developing economies. In Ecological Economics, vol. 32, 2000, no. 2, pp. 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00100-710.1016/S0921-8009(99)00100-7
  24. LAIRD, S. A. 1999. 9. Forests, Culture and Conservation. In Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, vol. 1–0, 1999, pp. 345–396. Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780445434.00910.3362/9781780445434.009
  25. LEE, S. M. – KIM, Y.-S. – JAUNG, W. – LATIFAH, S. – AFIFI, M. – FISHER, L. A. 2015. Forests, fuelwood and livelihoods – Energy transition patterns in eastern Indonesia. In Energy Policy, vol. 85, 2015, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.03010.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030
  26. LEFEVRE, T. – TODOC, J. L. – TIMILSINA, G. R. 1997. Implications for the forestry sector, conclusions and recommendations. In Trossero, M. A. – Department, F. – Nations, F. – A. O. In The role of wood energy in Asia. Of the United & I. Rome (Eds.), 1997. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7519E/W7519e00.htm#
  27. LOWMAN, M. D. – SINU, P. A. 2017. Can the Spiritual Values of Forests Inspire Eff ective Conservation? In BioScience, vol. 67, 2017, no. 8, pp. 688–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix05710.1093/biosci/bix057
  28. LYON, K. 2004. Modeling Timber Supply, Fuel-Wood, and Atmospheric Carbon Mitigation. Utah State University, 2004. Department of Economics, Working Papers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23696669_Modeling_Timber_Supply_Fuel-Wood_and_Atmospheric_Carbon_Mitigation
  29. NSSO (National Sample Survey Organization). 2012. Energy sources of Indian households for cooking and lighting (NSS 66th Round, July 2009–June 2010, Report no. 542 (66/1.0/4)). National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.
  30. PANDEY, D. 2002. Fuelwood Studies in India: Myth and Reality. Center for International Forestry Research. JSTOR, 2002. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02013
  31. PATTANAYAK, S. K. – SILLS, E. O. – KRAMER, R. A. 2004. Seeing the forest for the fuel. In Environment and Development Economics, vol. 9, 2004, no. 2, pp. 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X0300122010.1017/S1355770X03001220
  32. RANJAN, R. 2018. What drives forest degradation in the central Himalayas? Understanding the feedback dynamics between participatory forest management institutions and the species composition of forests. In Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 95, 2018, pp. 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.01010.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.010
  33. RASQUINHA, D. N. – MISHRA, D. R. 2021. Impact of wood harvesting on mangrove forest structure, composition and biomass dynamics in India. In Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 248, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.10697410.1016/j.ecss.2020.106974
  34. ROBINSON, E. J. Z. – ALBERS, H. J. – WILLIAMS, J. C. 2008. Spatial and temporal modeling of community non-timber forest extraction. In Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 56, 2008, no. 3, pp. 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.04.00210.1016/j.jeem.2008.04.002
  35. ROY, B. C. S. 2008. Connecting communities and conservation: Collaborative management of protected areas in Bangladesh. In Fuelwood, alternative energy and forest user groups in Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, 2008. USAID. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303079164_Connecting_Communities_and_Conservation_Co-management_Initiatives_Implemented_by_IPAC_in_Wetlands_and_Forests_of_Bangladesh
  36. SASSEN, M. – SHEIL, D. – GILLER, K. E. 2015. Fuelwood collection and its impacts on a protected tropical mountain forest in Uganda. In Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 354, 2015, pp. 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.03710.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.037
  37. SHODDO, G. H. 2022. The contribution of Gudo forest conservation culture is key to biodiversity conservation the case of Sheka Zone, southwest Ethiopia. In Land Use Policy, vol. 113, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.10587210.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105872
  38. SINGH, D. – ZERRIFFI, H. – BAILIS, R. – LEMAY, V. 2021. Forest, farms and fuelwood: Measuring changes in fuelwood collection and consumption behavior from a clean cooking intervention. In Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 61, 2021, pp. 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.02.00210.1016/j.esd.2021.02.002
  39. SINGH, M. – BABANNA, S. K. – KUMAR, D. – DWIVEDI, R. P. – DEV, I. – KUMAR, A. – TEWARI, R. K. – CHATURVEDI, O. P. – DAGAR, J. C. 2021. Valuation of fuelwood from agroforestry systems: A methodological perspective. In Agroforestry Systems, vol. 95, 2021, no. 5, pp. 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00580-910.1007/s10457-020-00580-9
  40. SPÎRCHEZ, C. – LUNGULEASA, A. – CROITORU, C. 2017. The importance of the wood biomass in environment protection. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1918 (1), 020007. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.501850 210.1063/1.5018502
  41. TORRES, P. C. – MORSELLO, C. – PARRY, L. – PARDINI, R. 2016. Who Cares about Forests and Why? Individual Values Attributed to Forests in a Post-Frontier Region in Amazonia. In PLOS ONE, vol. 11, 2016, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.016769110.1371/journal.pone.0167691515286127942038
  42. TRONCOSO, K. – CASTILLO, A. – MASERA, O. – MERINO, L. 2007. Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking: Case study in rural Mexico. In Energy Policy, vol. 35, 2007, no. 5, pp. 2799–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.01110.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.011
  43. ULLAH, S. – NOOR, R. S. – ABID, A. – MENDAKO, R. K. – WAQAS, M. M. – SHAH, A. N. – TIAN, G. 2021. Socio-Economic Impacts of Livelihood from Fuelwood and Timber Consumption on the Sustainability of Forest Environment: Evidence from Basho Valley, Baltistan, Pakistan. In Agriculture, vol. 11, 2021, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture1107059610.3390/agriculture11070596
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2022-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1339-3367 | Journal ISSN: 1338-8339
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 66
Published on: Jan 3, 2023
Published by: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Polash Banerjee, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.